SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nucks

Created by: Murph75
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 15, 2024
Published: May 15, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,000,000
4$7,000,000
2$2,500,000
5$5,000,000
4$5,000,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2025 4th round pick (CBJ)
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$85,045,834$0$1,357,500$2,454,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$11,600,000$11,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 15 at 1:19 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 1,152
CBJ pass. Decent player but we have tons of guys like him already.
May 15 at 1:21 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Quoting: Jacketsman61
CBJ pass. Decent player but we have tons of guys like him already.

I don’t disagree, i do t really care what team he goes to. Things haven’t worked out for him and I think a change of scenery would do him well.
May 15 at 1:26 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 1,152
Quoting: Murph75
I don’t disagree, i do t really care what team he goes to. Things haven’t worked out for him and I think a change of scenery would do him well.


You know I had a thought, he might do well going back to Toronto. Maybe him, Garland, and Hoglander for a 2024 1st? Toronto needs depth. I don’t think Van is going to keep Lindholm so maybe they flip that for a true 3rd line C?
May 15 at 2:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 910
Likes: 372
Devils are one of the deepest teams at RD no need for Hronek
May 15 at 2:34 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,253
Likes: 10,081
Quoting: Jacketsman61
You know I had a thought, he might do well going back to Toronto. Maybe him, Garland, and Hoglander for a 2024 1st? Toronto needs depth. I don’t think Van is going to keep Lindholm so maybe they flip that for a true 3rd line C?


Doesn’t make sense for us to move Garland or Hoglander.

Garland was one of our best forwards this year. He’s great offensively, great defensively, and an elite play driver.

And Hoglander provides cheap scoring depth. Had 24 goals this season, all at 5v5 which put him top 10 in the league in 5v5 scoring. Having him at 1.1M next season will be big

I’d be fine moving Mikheyev, even paying a bit to dump him if necessary, but moving Garland and Hoglander for futures doesn’t make sense for us
May 15 at 6:52 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 1,152
Quoting: mv21227
Doesn’t make sense for us to move Garland or Hoglander.

Garland was one of our best forwards this year. He’s great offensively, great defensively, and an elite play driver.

And Hoglander provides cheap scoring depth. Had 24 goals this season, all at 5v5 which put him top 10 in the league in 5v5 scoring. Having him at 1.1M next season will be big

I’d be fine moving Mikheyev, even paying a bit to dump him if necessary, but moving Garland and Hoglander for futures doesn’t make sense for us


EP40 extension is going to be difficult to navigate considering the buyout of OEL is still on the books. They need to avoid what Toronto fell victim to and that is not moving contracts that will cause headache in trying to retain key players. Garland is decent but can be replaced and should with cheaper options.
May 15 at 6:54 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,253
Likes: 10,081
Quoting: Jacketsman61
EP40 extension is going to be difficult to navigate considering the buyout of OEL is still on the books. They need to avoid what Toronto fell victim to and that is not moving contracts that will cause headache in trying to retain key players. Garland is decent but can be replaced and should with cheaper options.


Garland is well worth his contract. Canucks can manage the cap fairly easy while keeping him. The only really problematic contract is Mikheyev’s
May 15 at 6:59 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 1,152
Quoting: mv21227
Garland is well worth his contract. Canucks can manage the cap fairly easy while keeping him. The only really problematic contract is Mikheyev’s


I don’t know about that. Boeser is playing himself into at least 9 to 10 mil per. Hronek is also not going to be cheap either.
May 15 at 7:09 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,253
Likes: 10,081
Quoting: Jacketsman61
I don’t know about that. Boeser is playing himself into at least 9 to 10 mil per. Hronek is also not going to be cheap either.


I doubt Boeser will get in that 9-10 range. Closer to 7-8M. I also wouldn’t be surprised if he takes a more team friendly deal tbh

Hronek if he’s asking for too much will be moved

Garland was one of our most important forwards all season long. We’d use that money to sign someone and hope they’d be as good as he was. No reason to take that risk
May 15 at 7:18 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 1,152
Quoting: mv21227
I doubt Boeser will get in that 9-10 range. Closer to 7-8M. I also wouldn’t be surprised if he takes a more team friendly deal tbh

Hronek if he’s asking for too much will be moved

Garland was one of our most important forwards all season long. We’d use that money to sign someone and hope they’d be as good as he was. No reason to take that risk


In 25-26 and 26-27 seasons OEL’s buyout is going to cost 4 mil per. It is going to be difficult to sign guys back. We can agree to disagree but I expect some moves this summer from Van to alleviate the cap crunch that is coming.
May 16 at 9:15 p.m.
#11
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 7,256
Likes: 3,684
Quoting: Jacketsman61
You know I had a thought, he might do well going back to Toronto. Maybe him, Garland, and Hoglander for a 2024 1st? Toronto needs depth. I don’t think Van is going to keep Lindholm so maybe they flip that for a true 3rd line C?

Toronto wouldn't have the cap space for that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll