Bruins3773

Member Since

Nov. 7, 2018

Favourite Team

Boston Bruins

2nd Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

112

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 8:56 p.m.

Thread: This is the year

I don't see Lee taking a 1 year deal. I'd love for the B's to get him, but I think with him being in his prime, that he'll want a multi year deal for more than 6. I'm thinking 6x7.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 8:12 p.m.

Thread: Bruins Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jiannuccilli</b></div><div>Panarin will get more money and he doesn’t play RW

Carlo deal takes him right to UFA

McAvoy says no

Mojo easily says no

You won’t need to trade Heinen to dump Backes</div></div>

McAvoy at the most will get 7. Johansson won't get more than 4.5, and the report is that he may take a discount. Panarin wont get more than 9. Heinen is moved to make room on the cap for Panarin.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 8:10 p.m.

Thread: Bruins Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsTalk</b></div><div>Marcus will go from $4.5 to $3.5? Miller would be more a 3rd and Moore would be a 5th I think. Panarin will probably ask for more and the Bruins do not need Schenn</div></div>

The wind blows and Miller is injured, this drastically hurts his value. Moore is worth more than Miller. Panarin will at the most will get 9, like Skinner, and Schenn is for right handed defensive depth, which is a need in this scenario.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 8:07 p.m.

Thread: Could this be the move

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jiannuccilli</b></div><div>No from McAvoy.

Bad term from Carlo.

Too much money for vanek

Not enough for mojo

Vegas doesn’t take that</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jiannuccilli</b></div><div>No from McAvoy.

Bad term from Carlo.

Too much money for vanek

Not enough for mojo

Vegas doesn’t take that</div></div>

McAvoy isn't getting more than 7, and a bridge deal is perfect for Carlo (think Auston Matthews). Johansson's last contract was for 4.5, and the report is that he may be willing to take a discount to stay.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 8:04 p.m.

Thread: Could this be the move

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MisstheWhalers</b></div><div>How is W.Karlsson's value not high?
With the shortage of centers in the league especially 2nd line centers Vegas could certainly get something better then that for him.</div></div>

He declined so much this year and they are in no position to really get much for him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.

Thread: Im the Rangers and looking to trade Kevin Hayes Comment your team and Offer

To BOS:
Kevin Hayes
To NYR:
Danton Heinen
Zach Senyshyn
2019 2nd Round Pick

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 18, 2018 at 5:14 p.m.

Thread: B??s get scoring

Way too much for Mantha just not the type of guy that the Bruins need.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 18, 2018 at 5:12 p.m.

Thread: Would you Bruins

I like it. Just think that JFK and DeBrusk might want more.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 18, 2018 at 5:10 p.m.

Thread: Perfect deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>They would be trading for a Top 4 D-man in Darnell Nurse lmfao</div></div>

Yeah, but Krug is fine. There is no need for this trade

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 17, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

Thread: This is it chief

Cehlarik definitely deserves a shot in the NHL. This would be his best shot at staying here

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 17, 2018 at 1:58 p.m.

Thread: Perfect deal

The Bruins have no reason to trade a Top 4 D-man in Krug with their current state.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 15, 2018 at 12:29 p.m.

Thread: The Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>That’s fine, he might turn out to be good, but you said he was better than heinen. He isn’t. Donato was utterly horrific in the nhl this season. Potential? Sure. But right now he isn’t an nhl player. Heinen had 47 points last year with awesome two way play</div></div>

So then with Donato's potential, there is more reason to trade Heinen

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 4:37 p.m.

Thread: Just a thought

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>In theory, but without Backes waving it doesn't really matter if the deal helps both teams.</div></div>

Right, but you would think that he would

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 4:36 p.m.

Thread: The Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Donato is awful</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Donato is awful</div></div>

Uh, I beg to differ. He had 43 points in 29 games with Harvard last year, in addition to playing in the Olympics, and 9 point in 12 NHL games last year. Yes he had a rough start with the Bruin this year, but he has been phenomenal in Providence.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 3:47 p.m.

Thread: Just a thought

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Js31</b></div><div>Backes won’t waive</div></div>

Eh, that could be the case, but in general, I think that this helps both sides

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 2:43 p.m.

Thread: The Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>If you want donato, bjork, and a 1st, done deal</div></div>

I'd rather have Heinen in here over Donato. Feel that Donato has more potential and is better.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 2:42 p.m.

Thread: Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Agree on Carlo. And as I said before B’s are not getting. Nylander without giving up CMac or Carlo. I’d rather pass and get someone else. If we had and NHL ready, RHD ready to step in i’d feel differently. We don’t.</div></div>
Well Andersson is going to be ready in 1-2 years, so maybe losing Carlo, and then go with 4 LHD since that's a strength and since we have guys that are good on their offside

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 6:05 p.m.

Thread: Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>I know Bjork is a third liner that is my point. If you offers me that pile of roster clutter for Bjork i’d Would be tempted to say no.

Miller will not play 1st pairing anywhere without injuries, Leafs included. Zaitsev and maybe Hainsey would play ahead of him on right side. And they are nothing special.

I think it’s funny that you think a 1st and Carlo is not enough yet you offer less and think it’s good.</div></div>

In my opinion, I think that these two trades are somewhat equal. Carlo is a good defenseman, and could help the Leafs, but trading him would really hurt the Bruins, as he is a huge part of the future on the right side.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 5:25 p.m.

Thread: The Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>?????/. What? Columbus is in first place, they just might want Panarin for a Cup run. By your logic, why would the Bruins trade Panarin because he going to be a UFA next summer.</div></div>

Columbus has to resign both Panarin and Bobrovsky this offseason, they won't have the cap space to keep both, so why not try to get something for one of them?

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 5:10 p.m.

Thread: Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>magoodman9</b></div><div>Why would Toronto want to help Boston. They will probably be facing each other in the playoffs in upcoming years</div></div>

Because, if Toronto can't sign Nylander, they'll want to get something for him, and if Boston has the best offer, I don't see why they wouldn't take it. Also, they have traded with each other before, Phil Kessel for Tyler Seguin.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 4:30 p.m.

Thread: Boston Rebuild

The bruins are in no place to start rebuilding at all, especially with the young talent that is NHL ready or will be ready in 1-2 years.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 4:28 p.m.

Thread: The Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Propeller09</b></div><div>This is also not nearly enough. Like, miles apart.

As you said, Heinen is top 9 - I like him, but I don't see him becoming a top line guy, ever. A late 1st round pick is nice, but likely a guy who wouldn't play in the NHL for 2-3 years (if at all). we're not talking about a lottery pick and a veteran who can't seem to crack get off the 4th line of the Bruins for 3m x 3years? That For one of the best players in the game?

Panarin would cost at least one, probably two (depending on who) of (Donato, Heinen, Bjork, Debrusk) - Plus a 1st rd pick and another legit prospect (studnicka, Frederic, JFK, Vaakananan, Zboril).

If you added Backes to the deal (at this point he has negative value - even at 3m (he has NO points through 12 games and doesn't look good). Also, Backes probably doesn't waive to go to CBJ

The deal you proposed is less than what they gave up for 35 year old Rick Nash who was clearly on the back 9 of his career.</div></div>

Yes, however, if a deal does not happen, Columbus will become desperate to make a trade so that they can get something for Panarin.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 3:07 p.m.

Thread: Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>A 3rd liner, a 3rd pair d man, a washed up slow FW with a bad contract that nobody wants, a disappointing prospect, decent pick.

Would you take that for say Pasta? Nylander is no Pasta but I wouldn’t take that for Bjork.

You are not getting Nylander without CMac or Carlo going the other way. Pass. Other options.</div></div>

Bjork is a 3rd liner. Toronto's defense is a dumpster fire, and Kevan Miller could play top pairing their. Bruins are retaining half of Backes' salary. Maybe Senyshyn turns around in Toronto's system

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 3:05 p.m.

Thread: Nylander

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Nylander is not Gretzky. 1st and Carlo is his value. They would sign Nylander immediately not in the offseason. Heinen’s spot is not blocking him. Nylander would slot in at RW2 with Debrusk going back to LW2 and Nordstrom going back to LW4.

The bigger problem is coming up with the cap space to sign Nylander, and coming up with the cap the following year for the UFAs.

I don’t like it in general.

Rather go after Toffoli. Cheaper, better fit.</div></div>

Eh, Toffoli is 26 and wont be here for long with the bruins prospect situation, where as Nylander is younger and is worth sacrificing some young talent for

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 12:53 p.m.

Thread: Creative 3-way Nylander deal

I like it, just dont think that St. Louis would give up both Pietrangelo and Schwartz for just that.

First 234 Next

Page 3

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Bruins3773

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day