Chip_Mulligans

Member Since

Jun. 28, 2023

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.2

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 27 at 4:56 p.m.

Thread: If petey doesnt resign

That's a bit steep man, maybe if the 2024 1st is top 10 protected. Essentially the Canucks are getting a very high 1st round pick (probably top 5 as it is) plus 2 prospects who are 1st rounders (Ceulemans, Johnson), a 2nd round prospect (Del Bel Belluz), with Dumais as a sweetener.

Pettersson is a great player but he is due a new, heavy contract, and giving up young players with team control just doesn't make sense to me for CBJ. Although it would clear some room for prospects but I would rather clear the vets underperforming tbh.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 15 at 5:40 p.m.

Thread: Leafs Build for the Future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>svfsdv</b></div><div>And I didnt comment on the validity of the trade or its likeliness. I simply said, of all the items leaving TO in the deal, Niemela would not be the one I would point out as the highlight asset.</div></div>

I wasn't referring to your comment or take, simply looking at the trade and giving my comments from a Jackets perspective.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 15 at 2:45 p.m.

Thread: Canes Jackets now vs future

Interesting proposal, I'm not sure this gets it done but it's something to consider. I guess it would hinge on the Jackets opinion of KK. I'm assuming Morrow is similar to Ceulemans from a prospect standpoint.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 15 at 2:39 p.m.

Thread: Leafs Build for the Future

I don't much much about the other prospects involved but why are the Jackets trading Jiricek here?.....The return isn't too bad but the jackets need a top pairing RD and they don't come around often unless you draft high or get lucky. So I just can't see them trading Jiricek for an aging D, late 1st, and C prospect (although Minten is intriguing).

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 15 at 2:33 p.m.

Thread: Leafs - Blue Jackets

I don't see the Jackets trading Jenner for a rental and a couple meh draft picks. I do think Jenner would be a great fit on the Leafs (but would hate to see it tbh). With that said, I just think it takes a lot more to get done given his salary and team control plus fit.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 2:42 p.m.

Thread: Fair Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>svfsdv</b></div><div>Hahahaha. Good troll. Price for Tanev is a 2nd round pick. Otherwise, they can let him walk for nothing. No team in the league is going to overpay for him.</div></div>

No shot, just keeping Leafs fans in check wanting players for peanuts just for being Toronto

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 2:40 p.m.

Thread: Jenner to Leafs

Bertuzzi doesn't make sense here but Toronto has no other player they can (or would) move to make the cap hit work. If Klingberg were an option that would of been my choice but he is LTIR.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 2:28 p.m.

Thread: Fair Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>svfsdv</b></div><div>Hahahaha. Good troll. Price for Tanev is a 2nd round pick. Otherwise, they can let him walk for nothing. No team in the league is going to overpay for him.</div></div>

This is the Toronto price, all other teams would be a 2nd.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 2:00 p.m.

Thread: BOONE TO THE BRUINS

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CANUCKS4EVA</b></div><div>Maybe change to a first?</div></div>

I think it would have to start with more. Potentially a first, prospect and more. Adding a late 1st in this draft doesn't move the needle much if the scouts are saying a huge talent drop off looks to be after pick 20 this year (but the draft is always a bet so who knows). Jenner will fetch a haul if traded (Friedman even said so on 32 thoughts).

Here are my thoughts:
Jenner provides a TON of value for his cap hit ($3.75M) locked in for a couple more years. He is built for the playoffs, is great at Faceoffs (55%+) and gritty. He would be an excellent fit on the Bruins imo but I don't see them paying what the ask would be considering team control and everything else.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 10:57 a.m.

Thread: Pula-aho D 12

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jack_queen</b></div><div>Not that the trade is realistic anyways, but there was supposed to be 1st for CBJ.</div></div>

Ah ok, but yea not really realistic with all the moving pieces.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 10:56 a.m.

Thread: BOONE TO THE BRUINS

Jackets easily decline

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 7 at 4:33 p.m.

Thread: Pula-aho D 12

So CBJ trades Laine, retains 50%, and gives up a 2nd……for DeAngelo? A pending UFA and position not needed next year regardless. TF…..no shot

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 31 at 3:27 p.m.

Thread: Only and only if there is a demand out of Columbus

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Firetoddmcclellan</b></div><div>roy is one of the best defesive defensman in hockey they have the cap to sign and trade</div></div>

Roy is also 28 and needs a new contract. Jiricek is 20 with a rookie contract and a higher ceiling than Roy ever has. It makes no sense cap wise to trade for Roy for CBJ, especially if only for an additional 2nd or 3rd. That's like me suggesting Peeke and a 2nd for Clarke. No way in heck that happens.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 31 at 10:19 a.m.

Thread: Only and only if there is a demand out of Columbus

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Firetoddmcclellan</b></div><div>Trading Clarke would be extremely stupid id trade roy for jiricek and a 3rd or 2nd tho</div></div>

I'm sure you would but no way the Jackets take Roy and a 2nd for Jiricek

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 30 at 2:47 p.m.

Thread: Jiricek

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Awful for Columbus. They aren’t gonna give Jiricek away for a late 1st and a 2nd/3rd pair dman</div></div>

Right? I think they misspelled "Stutzle" in the trade.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 30 at 2:45 p.m.

Thread: 3-way deal

Shocker, other team fans want to give CBJ peanuts for a top prospect but that same top prospect on their team would require a first and top prospect plus. Right.......

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 30 at 8:14 a.m.

Thread: WIN WIN

Hard Pass, I wouldn't even do Zegras for Laine straight up. And you're giving a late 2nd for Jiricek, just.....no.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 30 at 8:11 a.m.

Thread: Triple reset

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Good for you, you'll understand why the tiny one is no good if Columbus ever makes the playoffs with him.</div></div>

It won't event take half a season for you to see PLDs laziness and lack of compete, good luck.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 29 at 4:35 p.m.

Thread: Triple reset

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Calgary declines. We'd do it if we were getting PLD instead of soft little johnny which would leave Columbus stuck with him.</div></div>

I would 100% take a "soft little Johnny" as you call him over a pre-madonna lazy player like PLD. LA made that deal, they can keep him. CBJ signed Johnny, we will keep him. Calgary made that trade, you can keep JH.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 26 at 4:30 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SantasLittleCrackpot</b></div><div>For Bean it's this season. For Laine it's two full seasons. It's not like CBJ is making the playoffs in next few seasons.</div></div>

Still don’t see the value here for either side. Injury risk for Laine, Girard has only played half this season as well. Essentially he is like a less explosive Boqvist but more expensive. Bean is a good value add but the rest just doesn’t make sense to me.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 26 at 4:26 p.m.

Thread: Keeping the pens in playoff race

So the Jackets retain 15% on Lindholm for a 3rd and then give Danforth away? No shot! And why TF would CBus help the Penguins, not going to happen.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 24 at 2:45 p.m.

Thread: Oilers add defence

So Columbus is retaining on Boqvist who has a higher upside, reasonable cap hit, team control, and produced more than Broberg. Is your goal here to offload Broberg, upgrade EMDs D offense, and then give CBJ a 4th for the 10% retention? I just don't see the value there for CBJ.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 18 at 2:21 p.m.

Thread: NEXT YEAR CBJ

Big fan of Eriksson Ek and his contract is more than reasonable. However, for the Jackets to send Johnson, Mateychuk, and a 1st (2025) is a lot imo. Maybe something like Johnson, Ceulemans OR Svozil (if MN wants a LD), and a 2nd ('25) may be more in line. Mateychuk is a LD the jackets I'm sure are not keen to trade. Interesting proposal though.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 16 at 1:37 p.m.

Thread: BOS 2C CBJ 1G

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>Thread was made by a Jackets fan, which I honestly did not know existed.

The Bruins losing Swayman for these spare parts means the Jackets win the trade.</div></div>

Only thing the Jackets need gone is Jarmo. Bag of pucks and you can have him.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 16 at 11:58 a.m.

Thread: BOS 2C CBJ 1G

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KolmiPN</b></div><div>Do you think Bos would be ok to lose swayman? I think the winner of this trade would be anyone who gets out of Columbus</div></div>

Jenner isn’t going anywhere and the Jackets have up and coming tendies. F*** Boston bud

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Chip_Mulligans

Member Since

Forum Posts

Posts per Day