JamieG613 Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HartemiPanarin</b></div><div>how close lol? like are we talking podkolzin/hoglander close?</div></div>

Bingo

Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago

Thread: utah anything but hc

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>Apparently, it’s Owen Power and you don’t have one of those 😆</div></div>

13 years

Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago

Thread: Ideal Offseason

Tanev's getting AT LEAST $6M if it's a 1 year deal

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: Kaner Marner

Leafs want a quality return, not quantity

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Poor finishing is a nice excuse for good goaltending BTW (if you look at GSAX) and the goaltenders importance on the powerplay is difficult to minimize.

It’s as if Jeremy Swayman had only a little to do with Toronto’s finishing rate. IMO, Jeremy Swayman was the primary reason Boston beat Toronto. Disagree?

I get because there are less goalies on a roster than forward, your quality in the mid 50th percentile is a better player than a center in the mid 50th

My perspective is Toronto had a better overall roster, but lost because Jeremy Swayman significantly outplayed your tenders.</div></div>

Yeah I agree with this mostly

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: Offseason

Leafs decline easily. You're overestimating Markstrom's value

Forum: Armchair-GM18 hours ago

Thread: utah anything but hc

Curious on what price the Leafs would have to pay for Schmaltz

Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago

Thread: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tm0000</b></div><div>Is he really "elite" anymore?</div></div>

Yes. Consistently wins his minutes (xGF%, GF%, corsi etc.), puts up 30 goals and 60+ points, can drive a line, all while taking on the hardest matchups every game

Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago

Thread: JT and Marner Waive NTC

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Yet

LA got bounced easy because of their mediocre goaltending in the playoffs

Toronto lost to an inferior talent team because of goaltending.

Jersey looked liked a team who was ready for a coronation of whose next who was derailed by mediocre goaltending

Ottawa and Detroit got sunk by mediocre goaltending

Sure, there are outliers who buck the likely scenario (like all positions), but most teams that try to go cheap at goalie pay for it. Of all fan bases who should know this. I’d assume it’s Toronto. How many second tier guys do you pursue before you realize it won’t work

No one with cap room is taking Tavares at 11M. Maybe at full retention, he has value. My guess is he tries to leverage an extension to get him to waive and he won’t want to take the salary needed for a team to consider that.</div></div>

LA lost because they got dominated on special teams (0% PP, 55% PK). Same with Toronto + mid 5v5 defense and poor finishing. Ottawa and Detroit both had bad 5v5 play coupled with bad goaltending. Goaltending matters, but it's less important than the T9F & T4D + the 5v5 game

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:54 a.m.

Thread: JT and Marner Waive NTC

Trading for goalies is dumb, especially when you're trading your elite 2C for one

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:53 a.m.

Thread: Seattle Kraken

Leafs say no. Quantity = / = quality

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:38 p.m.

Thread: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Marner doesn't have that kind of value. He's overpaid and ghosts in the playoffs. Without an extension, no WAY Marner nets that kind of return, especially because his NMC basically bends the Leafs over a barrel</div></div>

So you're admitting that your proposal was terrible?

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:16 p.m.

Thread: marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>Why do you think it's an awful trade? Not saying it isn't but say if it was Wright + Larsson + 2025 1st for Marner + a 3rd, what would you hate about it?

I eliminated Borgen, since I don't think SEA will just want to trade away their top RD and someone they are familiar just to end up with a new guy in Liljegren who is similar. I took off Liljegren and Robertson because the Leafs shouldn't be dealing Marner with 3 assets.</div></div>

Yeah, Wright + Larsson + A 1st for Marner + A 3rd is something I'm okay with (even without the picks involved). My issue is adding on Lily and Robbo who are our two best young NHL-caliber trade assets for no good reason, especially when they're cheap

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:14 p.m.

Thread: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>It drastically improves your back end, and it opens up a ton of cap space to find a netminder. Plus, Burns shows up in the postseason. Declining it is fine, but this is as helpful an offer for Marner as the Leafs will get.</div></div>

Leafs are going to want impact players with term on their contract + cap space. Burns has no term and Kuzy is basically a salary dump. It's not a logical trade and there will 100% be a better offer than this

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:47 p.m.

Thread: Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>For 1 year of Marner, and Leafs get a solution at RD they haven't had in years, and, what 5 mill in cap relief?</div></div>

I'd rather have Marner. No reason for us to make that trade

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:46 p.m.

Thread: Retooling After Feedback

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AdamL188</b></div><div>My comparables were:
Kuemper for a 1st, 3rd and Timmins (lol)
Frederik Anderson for a 1st, 2nd
Markstrom is better than those 2 were when they were traded, so it seems fair to me.
Maybe take out Minten and add like a Robertson/Lily or something
Gotta remember you're also paying for retention</div></div>

Markstrom isn't nearly as valuable an asset as Robertson/Lily/Minten/A 1st are. He has 1 year left and isn't a needle mover

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:42 p.m.

Thread: marner

Leafs say no, that'd be an awful trade

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 7:08 p.m.

Thread: No Trading the core plenty of cap space for UFAs

Roy & DeMelo both go for double that price. No reason to pay a backup goalie more than 2M either

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 7:06 p.m.

Thread: Need a star Mitchell

Marner for Larsson + Wright is probably more fair. Leafs say no to that trade as is

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 7:03 p.m.

Thread: Marner

A player with 1 yr left in his career, a washed Kuznetsov, and a late 1st round pick? No thanks

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 7:02 p.m.

Thread: NEXT YEAR MY TAKE

That Calgary trade would set the franchise back 10+ years

Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 7:01 p.m.

Thread: Retooling After Feedback

Leafs decline once Minten's name is mentioned. You'd be lucky to get A 3rd + Timmins for him from us

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 6 at 9:48 p.m.

Thread: Vatrano Roy and Reinhardt

Leafs say no

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 6 at 7:57 p.m.

Thread: Guess who Im trading

Leafs say no to that Marner trade. Also, no reason to sign 3 UFA RHDs when we have Lily

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 6 at 4:09 p.m.

Thread: My dream Leafs roster for next year

Giving up Marner, Tavares ($3M retained too!), our #2 and #6 prospects, a 1st, two 2nds, and two 3rds for Dobson, Buchnevich, and Thompson would be a nightmarish offseason

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

JamieG613

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day