SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Jets12Kozy

KFC
Member Since
Mar. 12, 2021
Favourite Team
Winnipeg Jets
2nd Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
1796
Posts per Day
1.6
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14 at 2:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 1:16 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 12:32 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 11 at 11:11 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 11 at 4:33 p.m.
Thread: Next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Flames1217</b></div><div>I see the appeal for Anderson from the Sabres perspective but I don't see the need for Kuzmenko.

I also don't see how the Sabres keep all three of centres going-forward as one of the three will want more ice somewhere else and the Sabres will need to plug their holes.

If the Flames end up trading everyone than I can see a deal to he had for Ras, if they want a quick retool I can't see him getting dealt. He is too important to the team.</div></div>

Ras was main piece I was looking to acquire, and the whole AGM was revolving around them apparently wanting to improve now therefore tried to get Kuzmenko in there too, I personally think BUF should be patient and stat the course they have an incredible pipeline
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 10:55 a.m.
Thread: Too much
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Augustus</b></div><div>My own two cents: The Jets would not disrupt their team chemistry this way in any case, so the debate is moot :)

Any further actions by the Jets will be depth additions to help with injuries, banged up and bruised bodies in the playoffs that need fewer minutes, etc. This proposal represents a major change to the team that just doesn't make sense for them at this juncture, I think..

Plus whatever the Blues feel lol.

As an offseason move though, if things don't quite pan out this year, maybe Parayko would be a decent target, if they can match the price it would require.</div></div>

Don't think it disrupts anything for the jets Appleton does nothing for the 3rd line and Stanley has been in the press box and requested a trade last year
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 8 at 12:44 a.m.
Thread: Too much
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>They're trading their only good defenseman in this situation to a division rival for 7 years mind you. I don't see a piece in there that would make a difference unless the 1st is a lotto pick which is unlikely. It's guaranteeing that the team is extremely uncompetitive for years. But yet they wont be able to bottom out unless they trade Thomas, Buchnevich and their goalies as well. Their ideal timeline isn't 5+ years. It's 2-3 as Faulk, Saad, Krug and Leddy's contracts tick down, along with Binningtons.</div></div>

Hmmm I just don't see that 2-3 year timeline, think Hofer, Snuggerud, Dvorsky, neighbors, Peru, buchinger primes while Thomas, kyrou etc are vets will be the next chance to make the push, they can sell off their current vets you listed and have some lottery years in between, rebuild the blue line. but maybe you're right