DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Ledge_And_Dairy
Member Since
Jun. 20, 2019
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
2nd Favourite Team
Tampa Bay Lightning
Forum Posts
38672
Posts per Day
21.7
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 2:58 a.m.
Thread:
Would San Jose Consider
doesnt seem remotely close.
not denying potential, i know hutson has a lot, but he doesnt feel like the type of dman you center your team around, and if the sharks are going to move their current best prospect it would have to be a face of the franchise type player. Hutson isn't that. Teams don't move 1C caliber guys for strong 2nd pair dmen.
What is more, if the argument is that the sharks need defense, they would have just picked Reinbacher last year.
It should be a easy decision for the sharks to pass on this weak offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 8:25 a.m.
Thread:
RHS Dman worth overpaying for
This isn't an overpayment
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 6:10 p.m.
Thread:
Four Things Must Happen If Leafs Run It Back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Lol Vegas isn't even gonna give you Thompson for a mid/late 1st. He makes less than league min next year. Hilarious that you think a 1st is an overpay</div></div>
Oh, no doubt and I made an edit because he's more valuable to LVK than the 1st, but that's AWFUL asset management for the Leafs. Darcy Kuemper had YEARS of solid play and got the #32 OA pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 2:51 p.m.
Thread:
2024-25
The only way I see the Flames involved in a Marner trade is in a 3 way deal, the teams who want him won't want to give up quality roster players and Toronto won't be that interested in futures.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 3:53 a.m.
Thread:
JT and Marner gone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>No he was traded on July 1st of 2018 so Buffalo paid his signing bonus</div></div>
Incorrect. That was the entire point of the trade. To move him before the bonus.
https://thehockeywriters.com/revisiting-blues-trade-for-ryan-oreilly/
"Viewed as a cornerstone piece to the Sabres franchise, and a pivotal building block in a long-running Sabres rebuild, O’Reilly’s trade was viewed as one that netted quite a haul for the franchise in an attempt to add multiple pieces to their teams’ depth chart. The deal came down to the wire as O’Reilly was owed a contract bonus worth $7.5 million by the team that owned his contract at midnight. If he remained a member of the Sabres the following day, the price to acquire the forward would have been vastly different. “It certainly, to me, changes the dynamic of anything from an asking price or what we’d be looking for from a trade perspective,” Botterill said."
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 1:58 a.m.
Thread:
An Outsiders Vision - CGY
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Zary will play center next year with Huberdeau and Sharangovich. Then Kuzmenko and Pospisil with Kadri.
Pelletier 100% makes the team
Odds are Markstrom is traded this summer</div></div>
Okay, duly noted. Thanks for the input! My choice on Markstrom was because I had a hard time sussing out what kind of value he'd return as there seems to be some heavily split opinions around CF.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 11:17 a.m.
Thread:
Big CGY trade sets up big UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DanielSan92</b></div><div>It’s a good thing Yzerman’s not dumb enough to sell firsts for 34 year olds when almost his entire core is still U23 and not in the NHL. 😂
Your ownership probably should’ve taken that first when NJD was offering it, instead of foolishly thinking they could compete if they kept Markstrom.</div></div>
He's just dumb enough to sign Chiarot to that anchor of a contract. The same applies to Vrana, Holl, Husso, and Maatta. I guess that's why you guys are trying to dump those contracts on us.
Didn't Stevie Y, the Wizard, trade for Nick Leddy? Didn't he move up so he can draft Cossa ahead of Wyatt Johnston? That Hronek kid is also doing alright on the first pairing in VAN, but at least you have 36 y.o. Petry as a replacement.
But hey I guess our ownership is stupid for not taking a hypothetical trade. In which Holtz was rumored for retaining 9M on Markstrom, not a 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 5:12 p.m.
Thread:
Pulling a Vegas
Flames wont be interested in more bottom 6 wingers, they'd just take opportunity away from some young guys coming up. If we trade Kuzy I think the minimum they'd take is a 2nd + a decent Center or Defense prospect. It'll depend on how good he plays in the first half of next season
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 8:54 a.m.
Thread:
Sabres
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>No they don't, Calgary is overflowing with middle 6 players</div></div>
And left shot forwards.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 5:42 p.m.
Thread:
sens
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>They dont</div></div>
Lol, I know. I still want Andersson tho :(
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 2:26 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs wo marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I doubt Schenn waives, Parayko probably doesn't either.
Something along the lines of Binnington + Buchnevich is more likely a base return</div></div>
The Blues are not trading for Marner without him agreeing to am extension that is a not insignificant pay cut. Which presumably means there is no base return at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 11:52 a.m.
Thread:
Sabers fan on Twitter trying to make this work
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>thewookie1</b></div><div>Solid but a bit on the older side and has a bit of a painful contract to be frank.
Savoie is presently destroying the WHL so I'd be hard pressed to move him specifically.</div></div>
His contract is not the issue whatsoever, 4.9M for three years for a top 6 forward is actually quite good. I still don't think I'd move Savoie for that but still
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 9:43 a.m.
Thread:
Sign Lindholm Thin out the wingers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I'm not saying you should draft a winger but definitely take BPA and Silayev won't be that</div></div>
I’m no draft expert but if it’s a choice between Parekh and Silayev, for Columbus, I’m taking Silayev. Dickenson over both. Levshunov over all three. So I get your point. There’s lots of good choices. Columbus reaching compared to the consensus could work out. And he could be BPA looking back five years from now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 7:48 a.m.
Thread:
Sabers fan on Twitter trying to make this work
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>What's the availability on Savoie?</div></div>
He's available for the right player. Idk if Coleman is that
I'd move Savoie for a high end 3C, idk about a winger
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 5:07 a.m.
Thread:
Habs win 2OA and go wild
Minnesota keeps their picks they need to upgrade their offence not their defence. 13OA they definitely aim to get a Center or a winger with size.
No one is paying positive assets for Dvorak unless he is retained then you might get a 4th.
Anaheim trade doesn’t work because Minnesota says no.
Anderson contract is arguably worse then Dubois so doubt LA says yes. If Dubois+ is moved it’s for a starter goalie not a **** 4th liner who doesn’t have the speed he once relied on and a prospect who has a 50/50 chance of turning out
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 7:04 p.m.
Thread:
What would he cost
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>They literally just extended him</div></div>
And if they trade him they might as well just be rebuilding
He's the guy to build or tool around
Marner, Willy, JT you can move on from and be relatively fine. Matthews nope your rebuilding if he goes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 5:58 p.m.
Thread:
ALL IN
These Leafs posts are getting worse and worse. Hardly a sense of reality at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 30 at 12:17 a.m.
Thread:
Lightning blow it up
Yeah sure, if Tampa's GM has a stroke maybe.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 6:05 p.m.
Thread:
Leaf trolls here is the only way to get rid of Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>That is absolutely a fair POV but any extension would be made after a trade anyways, when it is signed is less relevant. Gauging what he is looking for in his next deal could either lead to a reality check for Marner or narrow down trade options</div></div>
if im a GM of a contedning team and i acuire marner, and he isnt a 90 point two way winger for me, i would let him walk in FA. imo he is very worth the risk to pay big assets for as a rental but i wouldnt commit long term until i can see that he can have success in whatever system my team employs.
worst case scenerio is you overpay for a 2nd line winger for a year and then get $11 million in cap space in the 2025 off season
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 6:00 p.m.
Thread:
Leaf trolls here is the only way to get rid of Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>And with fans/media/team mates/management are making it obvious that Marner is not in the Leafs long term plans, any team that desires him can and will wait until July 1st 2025, unless Marner gets a cash dump trade with zero value. Or requests a trade (unlikely).</div></div>
Marner getting to pick where he'd potentially go does likely limit what the Leafs could reasonably expect for a return, but I think you're wrong in suggesting there won't be a GM wanting to make a splash this summer that wouldn't give up some assets to make their team better immediately and then have the potential carrot of being able to offer an 8th year if Marner's camp is now open to that idea. GMs don't often wait for a player to hit UFA status if they can land the player they want now, especially if that GM is starting to feel their seat get warm.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 4:05 p.m.
Thread:
Top four defenseman not top pairing defenseman
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Lindholm, Andersson, Power, Jones, and Seider are all absolutely top pairing defensemen</div></div>
People have a strange idea of what "top pairing" means. By definition there are 64 top pairing guys in the league, and most of these guys are definitely in the top-64 defensemen in the league.
Of course, not every team has 2 top pairing defenseman, some have 1, others have 3. But that doesn't change the definition.
"Top pairing" doesn't mean top-10 or top-20.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:15 a.m.
Thread:
Stanley Cup 2025
That is absolutely horrible for Weegar. A top pairing dman for a 7th d and 5th🤣🤣🤣🤣.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29 at 1:15 a.m.
Thread:
Another Leafs gm
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>You are expecting a better return?</div></div>
No, I'm expecting to work on an extension. He's not on the block, a typical on the block offer ain't gonna fly. Besides, Minten does not fill a need. Jarnkrok would be nice to have, but not like this. He's also not a need. If Buch goes as things stand, it will be for a package that addresses a real need.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 11:11 a.m.
Thread:
Better looking Sens 2024-25 roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Again, not arguing whether Avs can afford it. Just that Chychrun is better. I understand why the Avs can't make the trade but that doesn't mean it's a good deal for Ottawa either</div></div>
Certainly not arguing that it's a good deal for OTT. Makes no sense for either team imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 28 at 10:43 a.m.
Thread:
Stupid overreaction marner trade for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Marner is literally actively tanking his own value. He is also a rental with a full NTC and Columbus is a bottom 3 team in the league this season. Marner would never waive there and Columbus would never consider a deal like this</div></div>
I agree with your larger point, but they’re fourth overall going into the lottery. Literally not bottom three.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com