DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
LivingAnew
Member Since
May 11, 2023
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
419
Posts per Day
1.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 10:07 p.m.
Thread:
Turn the Page
At first, I mis-read the pick headed to CHI to take on 4 years of Korpisalo; I thought it was OTT's 1st rounder (!) Hence, I thought that if I were the Hawks I'd pull the trigger on this deal and figure out what to do with Korpisalo, later. Upon further review, of course, I saw that the 1st rounder contemplated here originally belonged to BOS. Ugh... Big difference - prolly the #7 OA vs #26 OA.
I doubt a low 2024 1st round pick is enough for CHI to take on Korpi's four years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 3:48 p.m.
Thread:
Amazing Draft
PIT is a team that really needs to do something like this, as their prospect pool is hurting from have been raided so often to stay competitive and they're low on higher picks this year and next. Apart from Yager and goaltenders, they badly need to replenish their pool. But they don't have their 1st rounder this year, either, to effect such a trade!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
Amazing Draft
I would think PHI would be a team interested in something like this; they need depth in their prospect pool. The question is whether a player the Hawks want will be there at #12 OA?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 16 at 2:00 p.m.
Thread:
Wings
Eh... Send him to the Hawks with a 2nd rounder (even a future one) and if they can't use him, they'll just buy him out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 10:08 a.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
One last thing regarding Frankie, as I just re-watched some of his postgame interview. He was asked how long it took to fully feel like himself after his significant hip injury last year... He said it was right after the World Juniors! So, perhaps I am overthinking this; maybe that's why he seemed to be inconsistent or was slotted where he was.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 8:52 a.m.
Thread:
Next year
Good job, Wadejos123! I might deploy some players a bit differently (e.g., I'd look to keep Richardson at 3-C), but as the team currently stands, this is a good look.
I might also seek to weaponize our cap space to help certain teams cope with cap constraints or other needs, in exchange for useful, short-term players and more high-end picks (say, players like Anders Lee from NYI, along with maybe Nate Schmidt and Alex Iafallo from WPG.)
I'd also look to add an elite, experienced winger to play with Bedard, as Hall's ability to stay healthy concerns me at this stage of his career... For example, I'd love for the Hawks to sign UFA Marchessault for big bucks on a two-year deal (even up to $9mm to $10mm AAV), for Bedard's RW.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 8:24 a.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
Hmmm... Didn't he start, too, on the lower lines at the U-20 World Juniors team this year? I remember being mystified by that... Maybe that was why; i.e., he was often slotted too low at U-M? By the end of that tournament, though, he'd become an assist machine - playing up higher, IIRC, and being VERY effective.
That may explain, too, what I saw in two games when U-M visited South Bend this past season (and why Nazar seemed inconsistent to me this year)... The first game, both he and the entire team got shellacked by the Irish, 6-1. (Slaggert was terrific that game.) U-M looked like they had "jet lag" or something. The second game was entirely different, and U-M beat ND in a good game.
I guess reasons for his deployment can only be speculative, without knowing their coach's mind or the dynamics of the U-M team.
Whatever the case there, though, he seemed to fit right in everywhere last night - 5-5; when he almost initially scored crashing the net (prior to his breakaway); and, even on the PK. I know, I know... it was only one game. Luke had good things to say about his overall game - in addition to the threat he presents offensively, he (Luke) emphasized that Frank played a responsible full 200-ft game, as well.
How great to contemplate what the future portends for us beleaguered Hawk fans after the last two-plus years! The fun should continue, too, as recent draftees graduate into the NHL (fingers crossed).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 9:56 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I formally take back anything i've said on this site about Franky needing to go play in rockford next year</div></div>
During the game tonight, I was struck once by seeing Nazar direct traffic in the D-zone (when the Canes were having one of the long stints there). For a kid in his first game to know where responsibly to be - and where others should be - in the defensive zone, and then to talk about it on the ice, said a LOT to me. He very well be up here to stay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newman23</b></div><div>IMO he was playing too low in the lineup too often at Michigan. He (and michigan as a whole) looked great when he was on a line with brindley and mcgroarty but he spent a lot of time centering the 2nd or 3rd line and was never put on PP1.</div></div>
Copy that, newman23; thx.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Same here! Very interested to see where he ends up in the lineup too. I'm also just glad that no matter what Frank was gonna do, he isn't going back to Michigan. I did not like the fit for him there. I felt like they were utilizing him improperly and I also felt like he made plays constantly that were awesome and brilliant but no one he played with was ever on the same page.</div></div>
Hey, Garak and newman23 - thanks for this ACGM and your thoughts. I, too, am excited to see how Frank does.
Garak, can you expand on your thoughts as to why you think Frank wasn't a fit at Michigan? I certainly did notice he excelled in the World Juniors - became a fantastic assist machine there - playing with really good players. Would it be fair to say that his talents were wasted a bit in college; that average players just can't "keep up" with what's possible with him, while superior players can not only "see" what he's gonna do for them but can capitalize on what he does? If that's true, he could make a better pro than college player, yes?
Regarding his contract; i.e., that it took hold IMMEDIATELY and he's burning his first year now... IMO, the Hawks are sending a message to all their prospects: we're gonna give you a shot and not seek to hold you back on earnings. If you perform at a high level, we'll reward you sooner rather than later.
Last, if he's THAT good (including adjusting to the pro game as well as Slaggert seems to have), then the rebuild is really ON. Gonna be great to watch the Hawks grow from here!
Exciting times, indeed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13 at 1:17 p.m.
Thread:
San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I do wonder why he didn't re-sign with SJS, though. Did SJS not like him? Did he not like SJS? Did he just want to go home and put in some more work there? Are there character issues? Etc. Because he played pretty well after being traded there and then he just went home.</div></div>
Yep. All questions that'd need answering...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13 at 1:08 p.m.
Thread:
San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>If Kaut wants to come back to North America, I think CHI should be interested in a deal like this. I'd absolutely give him another shot for a 7th round pick.</div></div>
And perhaps having a seasoned vet countryman on the team (Mrazek) would be helpful? As you say, Garak, likely worth a flyer for a 7th round pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 30 at 10:43 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason
Outstanding thread, Gents; thank you for all your input! Building NHL teams from a complete teardown is fascinating to me; it's full of mystery and difficulty. And the NHL is perhaps the most team-oriented game in professional sports.
The NHL draft, itself, is incredibly difficult, too - trying to project who a talented teenager will become an an adult in the NHL is fraught with challenges.
None of us is as smart as all of us. The more I learn from posts and threads like these, the better I understand both those challenges and ideas on how to meet them. And the more interesting and fun evaluating the Hawks become to me right now, as well (as opposed to the current roster).
Cheers, LA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 26 at 8:49 p.m.
Thread:
mk12345
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>I was thinking Ryjo from the Av's to Chicago, but yeah, the Kampf, Robertson and Timmins trades from the Leafs are annoying as well.</div></div>
Yah, RyJo was a good one, too. It's seems as simple as other teams' fans knowing we have lots of both cap space and draft picks, so we should freely be willing to waste those assets to help them solve <em>their</em> problems. And our benefit? To help the Hawks, "reach the cap floor."
Sheesh...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 26 at 7:31 p.m.
Thread:
mk12345
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks obviously decline</div></div>
Good grief, this is getting as bad as - or, dare I say it - worse than all the proposed TOR ACGM trades with CHI. At least with the TOR trades, more than ONE PLAYER is proposed traded to the Hawks. It's almost as though all the VAN fans got together and now believe that the more often they state a trade with Mikheyev to the Hawks for good assets in return, the more likely it'll happen.
I don't know if I can even look, anymore...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 25 at 1:39 p.m.
Thread:
Who rejects this trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Kovacevic never had any contact w/ Luke in Montreal. This is some ACGM fantasy. Luke was named head coach of the Hawks 3 months before Kovacevic went from Winnipeg to Montreal. Unless they were talking a lot on the phone or telepathically, they never had any direct contact.</div></div>
Well, I got snowed (he says sheepishly). Thanks for the correction, Hawksguy81 and garak.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 25 at 12:49 p.m.
Thread:
Who rejects this trade
If I'm Chicago, I do that deal. Kovacevic had good success with Luke R as a coach at MTL; I think that could continue in CHI. And, for now, anyway, he could fill a gap with RD- or gaps (plural) - if Murphy is traded.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 23 at 12:28 p.m.
Thread:
my hope for Hawks offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>Your just a quick drive up 31 from me lol. I'm smack dab between South Bend and Indy.</div></div>
Nice. Moved away after ~30 years in Chicagoland... When I go back to Chicagoland to visit my kids, I shake my head at how long I lived under all the stress there. Much more sane, here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 23 at 12:14 p.m.
Thread:
my hope for Hawks offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Thanks! Yeah, there will be a time and a place for frustration about the Blackhawks, but that won't be for a long time. It's best just to accept it and find other ways to enjoy the game and other aspects of the team to be excited about, like the rebuild process, etc.</div></div>
Concur. I now live in the South Bend area, and perhaps the most fun I had this season was attending Notre Dame games - like when BU and other teams visited with high-end prospects.
I especially enjoyed it when the University of Michigan and University of Minnesota visited, so I could watch multiple, high-pick Hawks prospects. And, truth be told, the Hawks' prospect with whom I was most impressed this year was... RInzel. Oliver Moore was all effort all the time, fast, and fun to watch. He has good instincts. Nazar was inconsistent; had bursts of making big impacts on the games, but also stretches where he seemed to disappear. Slaggert looked really good to me; seemed very positionally sound and willing to do whatever was needed for his team.
Contrary to what I'd heard and read about Rinzel, though, he was MUCH more polished than I expected. Sure, he has good size and speed; I expected that. But I was surprised by how positionally sound he seemed to be in his own end; VERY calm and competent. He almost always made good decisions there, even under pressure. Nothing seemed to faze him. I LOVE how poised he was.
Now, I saw him here in South Bend at the end of the regular college year; he made strides from the beginning of the season. And he seemed sometimes lost and/or indecisive in the offensive end. So, he needs more time. But... out of all the Hawks' prospects who came to play at ND, he is now the one about whom I'm most excited. Assuming he continues to make strides and develops in the offensive end, too, I can see him eventually being a top 4- or even top 2 - RD in the NHL.
Cheers, LA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 23 at 11:31 a.m.
Thread:
my hope for Hawks offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I get the appeal, but I do not HOPE for any of these things. However, I do HOPE KD stays the course that he started, building from within, and taking the patient long term approach. Adding long term big ticket free agents is a possible recipe for disaster at the point in the rebuild. Just be patient, Joey. CHI has so much more work to do, drafting and developing young players, before we will see real progress reflected in the standings... Like YEARS more. I just watch a lot of prospects now and get excited about drafts, which makes watching the Hawks "unbearable" games not so bad when you realize the kind of talent we can bring in and watch grow into pro's.</div></div>
Outstanding post, Garak; thank you for so concisely summarizing the approach I've been trying to implement myself this year, while watching our Hawks!
Cheers, LA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 22 at 3:50 p.m.
Thread:
Hawks should take a gamble on Kaapo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I hate the rangers and Kaako should fetch a late 1st at least if put on the market</div></div>
Copy that, dgibb; thx
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 22 at 3:47 p.m.
Thread:
Hawks should take a gamble on Kaapo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>He's likely worth a 2nd for a flyer, but Rangers fans go crazy so was being generous :)</div></div>
Well, to all on this ACGM: thanks for edumacation.
And, ChiHawk, you seem correct in that the consensus (from fans of teams OTHER than the Rags) appears to be that Kappo is worth taking a flyer on for a 2nd rounder of some sort (perhaps with a prospect, too), AND that Rags fans deem that valuation WAY too low! :D
GLTA!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 22 at 3:21 p.m.
Thread:
Hawks should take a gamble on Kaapo
Hmmmm... Well, I guess if I were willing to cough up TOR's 1st next year, then I'd definitely be willing to cough up a 2nd, instead, to take a flyer on Kappo! LOL. I'd be happy to be wrong about this. {;- )
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 22 at 3:05 p.m.
Thread:
Hawks should take a gamble on Kaapo
Thanks, ChiHawk, for all the thought you put into this post. It's exciting to contemplate the Hawks' future, and you help me see that better. It's easier to suffer the pain now, for a better glimpse of what will no doubt be a different team with MUCH more potential in a few years.
If I'm the Hawks, I'd make your deal for Kappo. Somehow, I bet that Ranger fans will have another opinion! {;- )
Cheers, LA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 22 at 1:31 p.m.
Thread:
STL 2425
Yah, it's not the right timing for the Hawks to "go for it." They are loaded at LD prospects, so would have no interest in Leddy. Maybe Saad might be of interest if he only had one more year on his deal; he has two though - might end up blocking some youngsters who may be coming up in that second year.
Saad was built for the playoffs, and the Hawks are nowhere near them... I hope STL makes it this year, so I can enjoy watching him in the playoffs again.
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com