SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Neon75

Obsessive Bruins Fan
Member Since
Jun. 7, 2022
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
Forum Posts
27
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2022 at 4:23 p.m.
Thread: Trading the Whole Team Pt 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TZ11</b></div><div>Carrick has more value, he's was one of the better Bottom 6 players in the league last season.

Henrique's contract isn't as bad as you think. He's still a good player. Not quite worth the money or the term but that deal isn't "terrible".

The Canucks aren't even paying a lot lol. Pearson and Myers don't do anything and don't hold that much value. And no a bunch of picks and Höglander don't make it worth it when the Ducks are giving up their best player in the process.

That Dallas deal is just horrible, sorry for the harsh words. Sequin has been pretty bad and is not worth his contract, ask any Stars fan (EsoYeezus69). He isn't even close to being worth a Top 5 Goalie prospect in the league, a recent 1st and a 2nd. Especially without retention. And Sequin is not a top line C.

Lundeström and Vaakanainen have more value than that.</div></div>

Alright, could I hear some suggestions from you? What do you suggest for Carrick, Lundestrom, Vaak, Henrique, Shattenkirk, and Terry? I still think taking on the Seguin contract would be good for Anaheim, I just want to know what a better price would be.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2022 at 4:19 p.m.
Thread: Trading the Whole Team Pt 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>Henrique had 42p in 58gp. 19 goals. doesnt seem like a terrible contract.

Stützle is one year younger and had a better year than Zegras did at his age... even at their current ages Stützle only had 3 less points. seems irresponsible to give away that much for such a minor upgrade (if you wanna call it an upgrade)

McTavish is going to be amazing. i wouldnt trade him.

Drysdale same... hes a great talent. idk if the idea was to just move everyone for a weird value but i would rather see a great 1 for 1 for a player of similar value

i gave up after this so much to evaluate</div></div>

Totally understand lol, just going to ask you a few questions though. The Stutzle for Zegras one I have addressed with someone else, but when you said you wouldn't trade McTavish, neither would I. This is a trading the whole team thing though, and he was considered on the roster, so I have to trade him. Is there any trade involving McTavish you like better? Also what do you suggest for Drysdale?
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2022 at 4:15 p.m.
Thread: Trading the Whole Team Pt 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>again with the caveat that I know that this is a bit: good lord that Isles trade is bad

Nelson (37 goals last year), Mayfield (top 4 D with $1.45M cap hit), #13OA, and Anthony Beauvillier (20 goal guy before his shooting percentage fell off a cliff) for Drysdale (good RHD prospect, nice so far), Pastujov(young winger, not bad, a few years away though), Comtois(mildly concerning), and something called an Axel Andersson?

I think if you weight potential vs. production, the first half of the trades are okay (Nelson/Mayfield for Drysdale/Pastujov), Comtois for Beau is two disappointing LWs changing spots, but that leaves #13 getting traded for Axel Andersson. Whatever value advantage you might give the potential of Drysdale/Pastujov over Nelson/Mayfield's realized production gets absolutely obliterated by this part of the deal,IMO.</div></div>

Alright so say the 1st gets removed, is that a fair deal in your opinion?