SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Novakstepa

Member Since
Jun. 13, 2019
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
Forum Posts
13
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 25, 2019 at 11:24 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 25, 2019 at 6:05 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 25, 2019 at 10:32 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hellochris06</b></div><div>I like Bean or Haydn Fleury in that trade. Left side depth on the blue-line is starting to be questionable. I'd trade AA for a high-end center prospect as well as he's the oldest of the "core". Ideally Larkin is a 2C if we end up only getting Byfield or Lundell my feelings aren't going to be terribly hurt.</div></div>

I think the only clear cut future 1C of this draft is probably Byfield. Lundell seems a lot like another Larkin, in the sense that he is a very good defensive minded center, probably the best in the draft, but still has the capabilities obviously to be a great offensive guy. But probably not put up the 1C points of elite playoff teams. If we miss out on Lafreniere or Byfield and fall to 3rd or 4th, I'm picking Tim Stutzle out of the DEL. The kid has hands, speed, great hockey IQ, and is lighting up the DEL. Look him up or look into him more if you haven't really. I have woken up at 730 on Sunday's to watch his Adler Mannheim games and I'm telling you, the kid is legit. He plays wing over in the DEL but has played center before and has the skill set too. I think he is the only other player who can be an elite line driving center out of this draft. I've been saying this for a long time that I'm drafting him at 3, even when the early draft rankings had him at like 10-12. And now he's slowly inching his way closer, the highest I've seen him is 4th now. But I'm telling you, I would absolutely love to draft him at 3.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 17, 2019 at 5:47 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2019 at 8:06 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2019 at 6:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 4, 2019 at 12:48 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BigDog91</b></div><div>Yeah I don’t think mantha is a stud. Risto scores more points, plays much tougher and valuable position, signed long term. I think Detroit fans overvalue aa and mantha</div></div>

The only problem Detroit has no interest in Risto. Detroit was unwilling to give up Mantha or AA for Trouba a real 2 way defensemen who has been on their radar since he held out. You're right Detroit fans do overvalue Mantha and AA sometimes me included. About the same as Buffalo fans overvalue Risto, Thompson and Mittlelstadt. I think you'd agree Trouba is better than Risto and Detroit trading Risto instead Trouba makes no sense. Smith is what the 4th best left wing prospect in Buffalo's organization. Girgensons is a good role player 3rd or 4th line but Detroit has Helm, Abdelkader, Glendening, DLR, Ehn and now Erne as well that fill that role as well and most of the better than Girgensons.

Eklund is a clown shoe and almost never right. Now did you read that article/blog entry that mentions the same trade? Because his source is Eklund so that link does nothing to support Eklund's rumor. If you scroll down they included a post from NHL Trade Rumors:

Multiple reports earlier this summer have included how RHD Rasmus Ristolainen would prefer to play elsewhere than Buffalo this season and it’s becoming more clear he may get his wish. According to sources the Sabres have held preliminary discussions with several teams including the Detroit Red Wings. Detroit would be willing to part with Anthony Mantha to obtain the 6’4 24-year-old Finnish defenseman. Mantha finished last season with 25 goals and would provide Buffalo some much needed offense.

The source is the Sabers nothing from Detroit about it at all. It looks like wishful thinking on the Sabers part. Risto is a middle pair defensemen at best and most of the lines I've seen on proposals done by Sabers fans where they keep Risto back up my claim.