DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
26
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
UpsideDownQue
Member Since
Aug. 11, 2017
Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
8440
Posts per Day
3.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 5, 2023 at 1:06 a.m.
Thread:
Adding a Power Play QB
Maybe DeAngelo -> MIN
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 23, 2023 at 3:27 p.m.
Thread:
Defensive Changes
Leafs should take that and run
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 21, 2023 at 11:32 p.m.
Thread:
Best complimentary top 6 players
Nichushkin unless you dont consider him complimentary
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 18, 2023 at 4:29 p.m.
Thread:
Garland for Manson
Doesnt really make sense for the Avs imo. They are already stacked on the wing, especially with Landeskog and Kovalenko joining the team by the end of the year so Garland doesnt really fit and theres bad blood between him and MacKinnon anyway
Also iirc Manson wont waive for any Canadian team
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 13, 2023 at 4:52 p.m.
Thread:
Askarov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ArakinSkywalker</b></div><div>that avs deal is very intriguing, nice to see something different for once. In two years colorados goaltending is going to be wide open with geo most likely pricing himself out, if annunen doesn't start progressing this would be a nice add.</div></div>
I would much rather have Ritchie than Cossa at this point. Cossa hasnt really progressed well since being drafted - he played in the ECHL last season for his D+2 year. Plus COL has proven they can find undervalued goaltenders through trades at the NHL level, so if Georgiev prices himself out then they can let him walk like Grubauer and find another replacement then
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 10, 2023 at 4:11 p.m.
Thread:
Jones
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ennis</b></div><div>Tough times</div></div>
If hes going to play I would prefer him on the wing but ideally he just a healthy scratch the whole year
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 10, 2023 at 3:58 p.m.
Thread:
Jones
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ennis</b></div><div>He's much better than JJ or MacDermid for the bottom pair. I was hoping they didn't roll with them</div></div>
They are using MacDermid as a forward this year according to Bednar
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 9, 2023 at 11:13 p.m.
Thread:
Final first game lines
Theyve been running Byram with Manson since he joined the main practice group
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Oct. 9, 2023 at 2:13 p.m.
Thread:
Rookie Point Projections (NHLe)
Did you just make up those numbers and formulas or did you do some sort of analysis on past data to make sure its accurate/useful?
multiplying NHLe by 0.925^(age-18) doesnt really make much sense to me - you are effectively saying younger players will have easier transitions to the NHL. Eg: if an 18 year old OHL player and a 25 year old KHL player both have an NHLe of 40, then by your formula you project the OHL player to score over 70% more points than the KHL player in the NHL
Forum:
NHL
Oct. 3, 2023 at 1:29 p.m.
Thread:
2023 NHL Offseason Discussion Thread #4 - The quiet period
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_Habs_fan</b></div><div>Just from looking at the methodology (which is listed on all of the pages), it seems to reward well rounded players a lot, however, you shouldn’t just look at the overall stat, also look at projection</div></div>
I see the weighting system but if its that far off I dont think the overall rating is even a useful thing to display
Forum:
NHL
Oct. 3, 2023 at 11:43 a.m.
Thread:
2023 NHL Offseason Discussion Thread #4 - The quiet period
Does anyone know if the new scouting reports added to CF (<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports">https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports</a>) have different rating systems for prospects vs NHLers? Just from looking at the first page of scouting reports they make no sense at all to me. How is <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/easton-cowan-17">Easton Cowan</a> (85) better than <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/elias-lindholm-73">Elias Lindholm</a> (74)? Even if they have a difference scale for prospects how is <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/erik-karlsson-75">Erik Karlsson</a> (67) worse than <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/travis-hamonic-2965">Travis Hamonic</a> (73)? And apparently <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/mathieu-joseph-2966">Mathieu Joseph</a> (76) is better than <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/scouting-reports/report/travis-konecny-77">Travis Konecny</a> (73)?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 25, 2023 at 3:26 p.m.
Thread:
Surprisingly
I think they will carry at least one healthy scratch that can play D so they arent 1 injury away from being short a defender, especially since they are on the road to start the season. Malinski or Shueneman would be my guess
Kiviranta probably gets 775k instead of 925k. As a PTO maybe he can negotiate a higher AHL salary but he doesnt have leverage to get anything more than that at the NHL level
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 23, 2023 at 9:42 p.m.
Thread:
Opening Night Roster
Avs decline. They just signed malinski they wouldn't trade him in the same summer. I'd give a 4th for Timmins though, maybe a 3rd if it was a couple years away
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 20, 2023 at 3:17 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Ok yes it is a +1 to +8 on xGA but the thing is it changes the weight of values. If you face less low danger shots the weight of high and mid danger shots takes up a larger portion of the percentage. This may or may not effect the overall xGA but it will effect the overall GA, which in turn will effect the GSAx</div></div>
That is already accounted for. If the xG model is accurate then it affects the weight of xGA and the actual GA probability equally. They cancel each other out when calculating GSAx, so the final GSAx stat is completely up to the goalies ability
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 20, 2023 at 2:09 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>They do have a small chance of going in, no ones arguing that but we are speaking hypothetically here. When a goalie faces 13 LD shots a game for 20 games vs 8 in that same amount period that is a difference of 100 shots. Even at 1% that is still +1 on GSAx. LD shots range from 1-8% in probability of going in so in theory over a 20 game sample size that is a +1 to +8 difference in GSAx.
Now I am not taking anything away from Georgiev here as he did have a very solid year but of the 55 goalies that played at least 1000 minutes at 5v5 he lead the league with 680 LD shots against and Vladar finished 55th with 168.
As for his LD GSAx, he let in 6 LDGA at 5v5 and 6 on the PK. I personally avoid using special teams as they can vastly swing numbers from the norm all across the board (ie a high penalty game vs Edmonton vs a high penalty game vs Philly could completely distort the truth). So looking at 5v5 I think thats a rather small sample size to justifiably say it will absolutely continue to trend downwards.</div></div>
Its not necessarily a +1 to +8 difference in GSAx. It's a +1 to +8 difference in xGA, and depending on how many actual goals the goalie let's in on those shots then the GSAx can be up to +1 to +8. If the goalie saves every single one of those low danger shots then he deserves that GSAx. If he makes the expected number of saves for those low danger shots then his GSAx would be 0. If you trust the xG model to provide an accurate probability of a goal for each shot location then GSAx is completely up to the goalies ability
Why are you so sure that more low danger shots against leads to a higher GSAx? Do you think xG models overestimate the probability of low danger shots resulting in goals?
For the Georgiev comparison it doesn't even make sense cause he also had a negative GSAx on shots from low danger areas so it's not like he's getting free GSAx stat padding from that. He was just good enough at medium and high danger chances which more than made up for that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 20, 2023 at 12:38 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>xGA is literally just the sum of the percentage of each shot against. How exactly does it account for some goalies making more easy saves than others?</div></div>
Easy saves still have a small percentage change of going in, so it's not like every low danger shot is free stat padding for GSAx. If that was the case then every goalie would have positive GSAx on low danger shots (which obviously isn't true - and if it was then the xG model would be updated to better reflect the percentage chance of low danger shots going in). It's literally the entire reason they weigh the shots against by their xG values to compensate for that
Plus for Vladar last season he actually had a negative GSAx on low danger shots. So if he faced more low danger shots and kept playing the way he was then his GSAx would have been even worse
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 20, 2023 at 1:14 a.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Why are you just repeating back to me what xGA is? I know what it is an I explained it quite thoroughly in my post. What I don't think you get is low quality shots still add up. It's like the old saying "every penny counts." Vladar faced 5 less low danger shots than Georgiev a game last year. those 5 easy saves add up over 10-20 games.
<a href="https://www.espn.com/nhl/player/gamelog/_/id/3942459/dan-vladar" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Here</a> is a list of all of Vladar's games from last year. You don't need to watch the whole game through either, just go to youtube type in "Flames vs Team X" and the date of the game and watch the ~10 minute highlight real. Hell you could choose all 6 games where he had more than 3 goals against and you will still see that most of the goals were not on him</div></div>
xGA already accounts for that. I'm not sure what your point is
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 20, 2023 at 12:27 a.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Eye test is almost always king and it should absolutely be noted that Georgiev had a negative GSAx the 2 seasons prior to being traded to Colorado. I find it to be a very volatile stat that can be hard to predict goalies success.
As for Vladar, out of all goalies that played at least 1000 minutes at 5v5, he faced some of the lowest SA in the league on average last year, as well as the lowest LDSA/60 and the 3rd lowest HDSA/60 (8.63/60). Whereas Georgiev for example had a middling HDSA/60 and one of the highest LDSA/60 (13.77)
GSAx is xGA-GA. xGA is determined based on xG of all Fenwick shots, which is essentially shots given a % chance of going in. A goalie that faces very few low quality shots will not add a lot of low value xGA to their total and those small numbers add up over a season.</div></div>
xGA already accounts for the danger level of the shots against, that's the whole point of assigning an expected goal value to each shot location/timing/rebound/etc. That's a huge reason why GSAx is the best goaltending stat available. Comparing low/med/high danger shots against is already accounted for when comparing GSAx which isn't the case when comparing raw SV% numbers for example
Eye test is good if you watch every single game and have tons of experience as a goaltending scout. For the vast majority of hockey fans they don't fit that description and watching a few games here and there isn't a big enough sample size to value that opinion over advanced stats accumulated over a goalies entire career
Georgiev had a negative GSAx for 2 seasons but also had a positive GSAx the previous 3 seasons. Overall in his career he was a + GSAx goalie which Vladar has never been. There was a risk when they traded for Georgiev that he wouldn't bounce back and would continue to underperform like he did his last 2 years with NYR, luckily for Colorado he did bounce back, but with Vladar there is no history of him performing well at the NHL level so that's not a risk I would be willing to take for that acquisition cost and cap hit
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 19, 2023 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingofRnR</b></div><div>Comps are Georgiev, Nedeljokovic, Adin Hill, Vanecek, etc. who all performed and were similar ages when they were Traded for 2nds or the Equivalent and had similar performance and signed similar $2-3mil contracts
Goalie Market isn’t hot right now, but when Training Camp Starts and Injuries happen, it should go up. DeSmith was Traded to VAN today, so what available options out there are any better right now!?
I’m not high on Foudy tbh, a Right Shot Centre Prospect would just be a good organizational depth pickup imo (Nolan Patrick is currently available for Free). I’d actually prefer Calgary Born Logan O’Connor, but we have a bunch of Right Shot Bottom-6 Forwards available to us already
</div></div>
Georgiev had a career +4.01GSAx in 129GP when he was traded (+0.0311GSAx/GP)
Nedeljkovic had a career +12.25GSAx in 29GP when he was traded (+0.4224GSAx/GP)
Hill had a career -1.38GSAx in 49GP when he was traded (-0.0282GSAx/GP)
Vanecek had a career -10.34GSAx in 79GP when he was traded (-0.1309GSAx/GP)
Vladar currently has a career -13.61GSAx in 55GP (-0.2475GSAx/GP)
Vladar is the weakest by far out of all of those goalies you listed. Hes still somewhat young so maybe he can develop into a better goalie but based on what hes done so far I dont think hes in the same tier as those guys at all
As for other goalie options: Halak is still available as a UFA, Stolarz if Knight comes back in time, Rittich, Daccord if Driedger is healthy, Delia, Lyon, Lankinen depending on Askarov, 2 of Tokarski/UPL/Comrie depending on how Levi does, Stalock if Dostal gets the backup role, etc
Not all of those guys are better than Vladar (even though a lot of them were last season), but if the acquisition cost is significantly less (or free via waivers) then they would be better options imo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 19, 2023 at 7:01 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>He's played 2 seasons in the NHL, both as a backup and GSAx is far from a perfect stat. Maybe go watch some of his games before making a judgement on him, the team failed him way more often than he failed the team.</div></div>
Tbh that could be the case. I think Markstrom has always played against Colorado in the games ive watched so im just going off of what the stats say. Maybe Ill watch a couple Vladar games this season
But for now GSAx is by far the best goalie stat available and its not making him look very good
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 19, 2023 at 6:25 p.m.
Thread:
Starting Lineup Option with 2 Veteran Signings and Vladar Traded
Vladar has a negative GSAx in every season he's played and has a 2.2M cap hit. I know there's the Vladar to Colorado rumour on twitter but I am not interested in him at all and especially not if we're giving up a 3rd + Foudy. What makes you think he's worth a 2nd rounder in value?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 14, 2023 at 5:52 p.m.
Thread:
Avs need a backup maybe
I think they are looking for a more short term G solution. Vladar with a 1.7M cap hit next year limits them from signing Toews
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 14, 2023 at 2:01 p.m.
Thread:
Fitting Hanifin
I think it would cost quite a bit more, especially if you want to dump Scandella too
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Sep. 14, 2023 at 1:30 p.m.
Thread:
Avs need a backup goalie
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheDuminator</b></div><div>G will be playing behind Toews & Bow... so he is expendable and saving 5M worth a lot in the Toews signature next season</div></div>
He can play both sides and plays over 21 mins per night so hes getting top 4 minutes. They may have to move him or Manson (probably Manson) next offseason to make room for Toews but it doesnt make sense to move him now when they have the cap space for him
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Sep. 14, 2023 at 1:21 p.m.
Thread:
Avs need a backup goalie
Avs aren't moving a top 4 D to get a backup goalie. If they want to trade for a healthy backup they can get one for a late round pick (or free from waivers) and keep their D core intact
First
4
5
6
Next
Page 5
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com