SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Voice_Of_Thruth

Tony Ferguson Fan
Member Since
Feb. 27, 2024
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
55
Posts per Day
0.8
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:43 p.m.
Thread: Has the Stamkos Era Ended
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Haymaker26</b></div><div>I'll give it a shot.

The scouting report on this site is a little outdated for Barron but sees his upside as a 2nd pairing 2-way D. His production this season is a step down from last season, which I find a little concerning towards his chances of reaching that upside. He's played in chunks of 3 seasons now but hasn't solidified himself as a permanent NHLer.

I'm not going to go off of Farrell's scouting report since it hasn't been updated in over a year. I think he's in a little similar of a situation: his stellar NCAA scoring hadn't entirely translated to the AHL, apparently partly due to injury. I think he has the highest upside of any of these guys.

Koivunen was 6th in scoring in both the Liiga regular season and playoffs this year. Afterwards, he was one of a few decent players as WBS collapsed in the playoffs. He could very easily be fighting for an NHL spot next season. I'm not convinced the gap between Farrell and Koivunen is particularly wide. He's also over a year and a half younger than both Habs prospects, so there's more wiggle room for him to grow still.

Foster's a step down from the other guys here. However, he is also still only 18 and was 3rd in scoring on the 67s this year. Probably a 3rd liner at best if he ever makes it to the NHL.

I'm willing to say Farrell and Barron are the better pair of prospects right now. Am I willing to turn a 3rd and a 4th into a pair of seconds for that swap? Not particularly.</div></div>

Yeah honestly didnt know about these guys either and was too lazy to check. Barron could turn into something if he wasnt so soft and farrel maybe a 3rd line power play specialist.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 19 at 11:44 a.m.
Thread: Keeping it stupid-simple read description
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chuck54</b></div><div>9 m for Lindholm is too much

He dont deserve more than suzuki and caufield ( by far )</div></div>

Agreed but thats what we need to sign him + its a one year deal so it doesnt affect us long term

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>I'm rather bring back Monahan than Lindholm</div></div>

Same but Monahan will want multiple years on a contract. If he is looking for a big payday at 9mil for 1 years thats fine I just think he wants some security with a multi year deal in case of injury

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AlexHarrison</b></div><div>I’d sign lindholm for 4 years 7.25 or big monahan back if he wants to come back</div></div>

That would just become a bad contract and he doesnt fit the timeline.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 3 at 9:01 p.m.