DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
WALaxer19
Chicago AGM
Member Since
Jul. 30, 2015
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
2nd Favourite Team
Vegas Golden Knights
Forum Posts
913
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 12, 2018 at 12:59 p.m.
Thread:
Latest Rumor - Saad for Faulk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FightMeMiaFarrow</b></div><div>No chance at all that Saad will net a top-four RHD with a lower AAV on their contract. If Saad is traded this offseason, the return will most likely be <em>very</em> disappointing for Hawks fans after the year that he had. Bowman might as well have Saad stick around for the time being in the hopes that he'll bounce back next season.</div></div>
That just isn't true. You can't look purely at offensive scoring numbers from one season. Saad had incredibly good analytical stats. Frankly, based on those stats, he had an incredibly unlucky year, and partnered with another down year from Toews and inconsistency on the RW, it makes sense. But he won't be that "bad" again next year. His workload this year warranted much better numbers than what he posted. Saad is worth more than an overrated purely offensive defenseman who is no where close to being Carolina's best defenseman. In my book, he is their fourth defenseman behind Slavin, Pesce, and Hanifin.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 12, 2018 at 12:50 p.m.
Thread:
Latest Rumor - Saad for Faulk
The Hawks won't give Saad for Faulk, plain and simple. Carolina can ask, but Bowman hangs up the phone.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 10:39 p.m.
Thread:
full rebuild - keith kane toews
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsmith1990</b></div><div>That Kane trade is awful...why would CHI give up a 1st rounder also if they are rebuilding? lol</div></div>
To get Dahlin..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 9:17 p.m.
Thread:
Why am I making so many of these
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Eli</b></div><div>That's a very generous offer for Faulk.
I don't think you can get rid of Seabrook without taking back equivalent money, or throwing in a ton of picks.</div></div>
Agreed. Way too much for Faulk. And yeah, unfortunately, Seabrook basically can't be traded, unless the Hawks gave up someone like Schmaltz, DeBrincat, or Jokiharju, and Bowman won't make that mistake again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 6:07 p.m.
Thread:
Evan
No chance the other team does any of these deals. None are even close.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 6:02 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuild
Stone?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 4:51 p.m.
Thread:
Flipping over the team
Blackhawks accept and hang up before Canes change their mind. My goodness.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 3:45 p.m.
Thread:
Big Moves No Tavares
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>Also not sure where you heard this but I think you may have gotten some facts jumbled a little
Ideally we'd like to move Skinner for a pick and a prospect, and move Faulk for a forward
Either way, Carolina's priority list, Top 6 center, Goaltender, wing help</div></div>
It's fairly well-known. John Jaeckel, a reliable Hawks source, has mentioned it. And I disagree on your assessment of those players, which makes sense if you are not a Blackhawks fan. No, none of those players knock your socks off. Hillman jumped straight from college to the NHL. He was not seen as an NHL player in his draft year, hence the low pick. But he really developed in college. Should be a viable bottom pairing guy, though may need a year in the AHL. Hayden is a force. He is a prototypical fourth liner who has offensive skill as well. Sure, Murphy isn't Faulk. But he is a viable #4 defenseman, which allows you to fill in for losing Faulk. Duclair gives you much-needed offensive ability, and with a chance to shine in a top-six role, he could pay big dividends. Forsberg can develop into a good backup, which is really what Darling is, and Forsberg costs a fraction of the money. And then add in a first round pick in one of the deepest draft classes in years. That is a massive haul for a somewhat overrated defenseman in Faulk (yes he scores, but he is not a premier defender by any means) and a grossly overpaid backup goalie.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 1:55 p.m.
Thread:
Big Moves No Tavares
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shifttee</b></div><div>Carolina says no,
Adding a bunch random bodies to a trade doesn't hide the fact that there is nothing of value for us there</div></div>
Why would Carolina not take that? They want a first and a prospect or player for Faulk. Duclair and 27th is enough for Faulk. So then it's Murphy, Hillman, Forsberg, Hayden, and Hoss'a contract for Darling retained and a pick. That is a steal for Carolina.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 11:16 a.m.
Thread:
FA moves and Faulk
Way too much for Faulk.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2018 at 10:15 p.m.
Thread:
Maybe....
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wagsnags</b></div><div>You expect GMBots to send you a 7th Round draft pick for a player that will probably never play again and be on the hook to potentially pay him $5.275 million a year for the next 3 years.
Come on man!!!</div></div>
It's actually $1 million in salary. $5.275 is just the cap hit, which is helpful for teams needing to hit the floor.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2018 at 8:16 p.m.
Thread:
Conservative Approach - CAR, NYI, MTL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Canes pass. Value isn’t terrible. Not what they are looking for though. They want a first line forward now. Duclair isn’t there and picks are years away.</div></div>
It's been reported they are talking a deal of 27th overall and someone/something mid-end (such as Duclair) for Faulk. It's not unreasonable at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2018 at 4:34 p.m.
Thread:
Canes deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Even with Darling going the other way, why would we touch Hossa? And the Nashville 1st not even your own? Nah thanks mate. Keep the guy who's allergic to his own equipment</div></div>
Because he is only about a million more in cap space but only costs $1 million in actual dollars, which the owner would like. Canes want to move Darling's cap hit and dollars and look elsewhere in net.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2018 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
David's Hawks Projection
Dahlstrom and 27th is about right, not 8th...but Carolina doesn't need defensemen either, so it would need to be a forward, not Dahlstrom.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2018 at 1:50 p.m.
Thread:
Dream summer
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brad79</b></div><div>KARLSSON will want and get way more than 6.5 a year....but as a hawk fan thus team does look good</div></div>
That is his current contract. In the trade description, it is stated he would get an 8-year, $11 million per year extension before the trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 10:57 p.m.
Thread:
Toronto Maple Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sens4life</b></div><div>Yikes that is a dreadful trade for AZ...take out Domi and this years 1st and it's around fair</div></div>
Which is funny, because some would argue that is not enough for Matthews, haha. OEL, 5th overall, another top 5 pick, and Domi (Merkley is a toss-in in a deal like this)...honestly not sure Toronto takes that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 10:20 p.m.
Thread:
Big changes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HawksFan28</b></div><div>OH hell no - 8th would be out of the question...... 27th and Hossa for Bobby Ryan (6 million dollars in cash savings for Ottawa) and 4th overall..
If 8th overall was the counter proposal I would hang up the damn phone and not pick it up again if it was Ottawa.
Hossa's salary is only 1 million dollars, Ryan's salary is 7.25.
Why would Ottawa want Anisimov when his salary is like 4.50?
With Hossa Ottawa basically saves like 6 million dollars in real cash..... With Anisimov they save 2.75 million...
The whole point of that trade is to free up cash (because Ottawa is on a budget) so Melnyk can get Karlsson re-signed..
It's not like Hossa is hurting the Hawks at all - his contract doesn't handcuff Bowman on what he can spend this summer considering Bowman can go 10% over the salary cap in the off-season.
So Hossa has a lot of value, weather a team wants to dump a more expensive salary for Hossa's 1 million dollar salary, or even if teams want to use Hossa to circumvent the salary cap floor - because from a salary cap position Hossa is basically a 4.275 million dollar "salary cap coupon"... But in this trade Hossa would be used to free up real cash to get Karlsson re-signed ..... So yea, trading for Anisimov does nothing for Melnyk's $$$$ problem.....
Sure, if they wanted a warm body thrown into the trade (that can play) along with Hossa - I would toss in Duclair no problem.</div></div>
I understand that, and I would LOVE if they did the deal you want. But why on earth would they give up a competent but overpaid winger AND 4th overall to save some money? That would be VERY poor management of assets...VERY poor. They don't need to move the 4th pick to keep Karlsson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 9:21 p.m.
Thread:
Big changes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HawksFan28</b></div><div>No way, that's giving up too much for everything...
Hossa & pick #27 for Bobby Ryan and 4th overall would be a way better deal.
That would allow Ottawa/Melnyk to free up 6.275 in real cash to help get Karlsson resigned. Of course the Hawks would draft 4th, 8th & 27th and Bowman would also solve the "who's playing 2nd line LW" problem at the same time....
I like Karlsson a lot but not that much...
I mean trading Saad would be a stupid knee-jerk reaction...... Look, the whole team fell flat last season, it's not like Saad was the only one to have a bad season..... I would only trade Saad for a MASSIVE overpayment - I mean I would want a top 10 pick in this draft + a really really good prospect...
Besides, Karlsson is going to want 10 million at least to resign next summer and that is something the Hawks just cant afford - especially when we have Schmaltz's contract expiring, and I would think if he has an excellent 2018-19 season he's going to want at least a 3.5-4 million dollar bridge deal, then of course we have DeBrincat coming up in 2019-20 and the same goes for him - he's going to want a 3.5-4 million dollar bridge deal.....
So yea, a trade like this would put the Hawks right back into cap hell....
I would take Bobby Ryan and the 4th overall pick tho (Tkachuk)..... Heck it would be even better if Ottawa retained $1,000,000...</div></div>
That just won't happen. Ryan and 4th for 8th and Anisimov maybe, with money retained on Ryan.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 8:44 p.m.
Thread:
Faulk Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Hawks are giving away too much. Car is happy to dump Darling even retain some, although they won’t agree to that much, so Faulk is with the #27 pick and AA. Darling for a 3rd rounder and Hino? I don’t think so.
Also finish the team.</div></div>
Yeah, too much given up for sure. No way Hinostroza is in a deal like this. Take him out and replace him with a decent ish prospect and fine.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 8:42 p.m.
Thread:
Back In Biz
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Sikura too, but Filip is a once every other year type of player. You take him no matter what and you can always use any of these as trade pieces. The NHL is getting much faster and less physical. Besides, Brady may play BU for another year.</div></div>
I understand, but you just can't have a handful of tiny, purely offensive players. It doesn't work in the playoffs. Tkachuk has it all, including the high-end offensive skill. Not as high as Zadina, obviously, but it's close enough where the other aspects of his game make him a more useful player for a team like Chicago. You can't go wrong with either, but Tkachuk is the better fit for what the Hawks are needing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 8:01 p.m.
Thread:
Just a thought? Opinions
Chicago says yes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 6:28 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuilt blueline
If Ottawa would do that deal, I'd do it in a heartbeat. That said, Seabrook would nix it anyway, unfortunately. Also, with this roster, the lines should be: Saad-Toews-DeBrincat, Ryan-Schmaltz-Kane, Duclair-Anisimov-Sikura, Kahun-Hinostroza-Hayden.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 6:23 p.m.
Thread:
Dy-No-Mite
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dbudz12</b></div><div>Yep lets ban Schmaltz to the 4th line when the dude has the potential to be a 1C. Good idea.</div></div>
Not if he can't win a face off. But yes, 4th line for Schmaltz is absurd. He needs to be in a top six role regardless of if he is a center or left wing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 6:20 p.m.
Thread:
Back In Biz
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Not taking Filip over Brady at the #3 pick? Ouch
Hino is not a Center, he's a wing despite what capfriendly says. Schmaltz would be a waste as a 3 C, he should be on the wing on the 2nd line. Highmore is a Center, but the 4th line Center is very likely Kampf. With 21 players and next to know cap space this is not happening. CAR trade is overdone; would be 1st and AA for Faulk or AA, 1st and Duclair for Faulk at the very most. Jokiharju will more the likely not start the year in the NHL and may not play next year in the NHL.</div></div>
Tkachuk is exactly what this team needs. They don't need more small skilled forwards. They already have those in Schmaltz, Hinostroza, and DeBrincat. They need size and skill, and Tkachuk has those in an abundance. Zadina may have a bit more skill than Tkachuk, but it would be a mistake to pass on Tkachuk if given the opportunity.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 7, 2018 at 12:44 p.m.
Thread:
Montreal trade - thoughts, Habs fans?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Habby12</b></div><div>I would do the trade if you take out the 2nd and 3rd round pick from each side of the trade. I doubt Danault will go back to Chicago though.</div></div>
I'd insist on those picks staying. Montreal already has three other 2nd round picks. And why would Danault not want to go back? It's a familiar place for him and it's not like Chicago didn't want him when they traded him...it's that they had to give up something good in the deal. Chicago would LOVE Danault back.
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com