SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

fuzzythesheep

Member Since
Apr. 7, 2019
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
18
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 24, 2021 at 3:17 p.m.
Thread: Heres what Id do now
You're not getting a pick back in that DeMelo deal, I'd be really happy Schmidt for DeMelo 1 for 1 tbh. Bozak is not better than Dickinson and neither likely sign for what you've guessed. Halak also gets $2m+ somewhere. I don't really want Borowiecki (purely on a hockey level - seems like he's a great dude) but I guess we'll be happy with any Holtby trade that doesn't involve cap retention. No way Leivo comes back after the way he left.

On the other side of things I think Hamonic would be lucky to get $2.5, would hope to get him back at $2. Depending on how long we go on Garland we might get him down at $4m

Bottom line: love the lineup but don't fully agree with how you got there. Might need a different back up goalie and to accept we'll likely have Boyd as the 4th line center and Dickinson will be good at 3c
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2019 at 6:53 a.m.
Thread: Back up and Stable Defence
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GFD1996</b></div><div>no offence - but all those wingers are significantly worse than Johnsson other than JT whereas Ferland is more of a third line grinder - I think Johnsson would make some real good chemistry with Petterson and could perhaps be utilized on the right</div></div>

Agreed 100% Johnsson would be a good piece to add but I think our current team needs Stecher more than Johnsson. If Toronto wanted to add some<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GFD1996</b></div><div>no offence - but all those wingers are significantly worse than Johnsson other than JT whereas Ferland is more of a third line grinder - I think Johnsson would make some real good chemistry with Petterson and could perhaps be utilized on the right</div></div>

Totally agree that Johnsson would be our 2nd best left wing but in terms of asset management I'd prefer to keep Stecher and not have to waive and possibly lose a serviceable NHL winger. This makes the trade effectively Stecher + Leivo/Roussel for Johnsson which I don't think it's good business for the Canucks.

What we need is a trade that converts some of our surplus depth forwards into a pick/prospect. Would be open to trading away Pearson, Virtanen, Baertschi, Goldobin, Sutter, Ferland, Eriksson, Motte, Leivo, Schaller, Beagle or Roussel.