ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

kingkanuck

AN "ORIGINAL SIX"

Member Since

Oct. 26, 2016

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

1763

Posts per Day

0.6

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 2:35 p.m.

Thread: Colton

No chance the Canucks are doing that. Zadorov has been great especially recently

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 29 at 7:12 p.m.

Thread: Take Two

Isn't going to happen

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 29 at 7:10 p.m.

Thread: Take Two

Pettersson isn’t going nowhere

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25 at 2:42 p.m.

Thread: Odd and unusual

Canucks wouldn't give up Willander alone for that package, let alone add a 1st and Hoglander on top.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 6:22 p.m.

Thread: depth and other pieces dont grill me too hard

Why would van do this?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 7:25 p.m.

Thread: Canucks Players Really Want Tanev

They need to learn Boston's lesson from last season. Don't upset the wagon when things are going well.

So far this season, they're the single most potent offensive team in the salary cap era by a large margin in terms of shooting percentage. Whatever they're doing is working. Don't mess with it.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 3:44 p.m.

Thread: Clever Trades

Why the hell would the Canucks do that?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 10:35 a.m.

Thread: Brad

i follow the canucks and leafs. you do not want this version of bertuzzi. would be a tremendous downgrade over what big Z brings right now.

last year's playoff version- yes. this year.... guy is playing very uninspired

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 5 at 9:40 p.m.

Thread: adding other elements

Do not retain salary for Mikheyev and we retain half of Anderson, I think nucks fans would be able to swallow that

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 3 at 2:46 p.m.

Thread: deep run

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazWild</b></div><div>Bull****....

If that's the case I feel sorry for Vancouver's bottom-six. Really I am. It must be terrible having so many Ahl'ers clogging up your depth. Because Brandon Duhaime is a better player than everyone in your bottom-six not named Garland.

He's a younger version of Marcus Foligno (the good years). And belongs on most teams 3rd lines. So if you think he's simply just a 4th liner or healthy scratch level player you haven't watched him much.</div></div>

Duhaime has 5 points in 49 games this year. 32 in 180 career games. He’s a much worse version of Dakota Joshua. Joshua is much better offensively, better defensively, and more physical. Literally the only player in the Canucks bottom 6 h that Duhaime might be better than is Aman. Garland, Joshua, Blueger, Hoglander, and Lafferty are all significantly better than him

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 3 at 3:00 a.m.

Thread: Yayayayayayayaya

Canucks aren’t paying a 2nd for a would be healthy scratch. I like Kovacevic as a cheap depth option but definitely not for a 2nd. A 4th is probably the most I’d pay

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 5:35 p.m.

Thread: Moves Before March

If you want Zadorov give us a 1st. You had your chance to acquire him and missed out. You’ll have to overpay to get him

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 11:57 a.m.

Thread: Finishing touches ALL IN

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>I'm not the owner of this thread... And to put it simply, the Canucks aren't good enough to go talent alone</div></div>

I don't know, I think they're pretty star-studded and have that depth. They've been at the top of the standings all year and have just added great centre depth without losing a significant roster piece. I think they stand a pretty good shot, although I am biased.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 11:21 a.m.

Thread: Finishing touches ALL IN

Honestly, VAN shouldn't do either of these trades.

Lettermaki for Walker is an overpay; Walker would be a great add but not at the expense of Lettermaki.

Joshua is integral to that third line. Losing him whatsoever is a no-go, unless you want depth scoring to completely fall off and to lose the defensive responsibility of the bottom-6. Especially if you add in Kubalik. That man is an albatross to any line and is a worse Kuzmenko. He'd be unable to play in Tocchet's system whatsoever and would just sit in the press box. Tarasenko at 50% is good though; maybe just him for 2025 1st?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 12:29 p.m.

Thread: yuuup

Ian Cole is being relied on as our 3rd most played dman and is a playoff guy. No chance he's moved.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 31 at 12:50 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

Can tell a Leafs fan made this. This is awful for the Canucks

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 31 at 12:48 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

Why would VAN move Zadorov out? They "just" got him!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 31 at 12:33 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

These are horrendous trades for the Canucks. Domi and Zegras cannot play Tocchets style to any degree and will spend more time in the press box than on the ice. Reaves is done and his contract is awfull.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 8:23 p.m.

Thread: Kuz why not

If VAN is willing to include Brzustewicz, I think CHI would have to strongly consider making the deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 8:31 p.m.

Thread: Jenner v45

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vancity2196</b></div><div>Why would Vancouver trade Hunter 🤨?</div></div>

Cuz they get a number 2 center who is a good 200 foot player for 3 years and 3 mill..

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 19 at 6:28 p.m.

Thread: legit or nah

Not the prospects to trade in my estimation. Def not both of them. Hoglander is just such a stud. One of the best value contracts on the team. And Podz I think might be the same as Hogs next yr. Could be a bit wishful thinking on him but people are righting him off a little which i don't think is wise. 1st, Brzuschevich, Kuzmenko is probably the best offer we can do I'd say.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 19 at 11:55 a.m.

Thread: play him or trade him

Hate to say it but Tochett is destroying Kuzmenko's value. He's a scorer that needs a center that capable of feeding him. If you want to trade him boost his numbers and let him go.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 4:03 p.m.

Thread: JEEK

wild accept, imo

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 4:12 p.m.

Thread: JEEK

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Altar7358</b></div><div>If this is just for fun so be it but the wild aren’t moving EEK. If they were this would be on the lower end of offers</div></div>

This is basically like 3 1sts and 3 2nds. You wouldn't get this much if you were going to trade him. I don't think anyone ever has. At least not in the last 30 yrs.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 7:37 p.m.

Thread: Custom made

Love that trade.Not so sure Sabres fans will.

Page 2

SalarySwish | NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly

Popular Teams
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Popular Players
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com