SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Odd and unusual

Created by: Redmile04
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 25, 2024
Published: Feb. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Willander, Tom [Reserve List]
  3. 2025 1st round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Tanev, Christopher
  2. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Retained 25%
2.
CGY
NJD
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Markström, Jacob
Additional Details:
Retained 2 475 000 off Hanifin expiring Contract then Sign and Trade him 8x7yrs. Markstrom Retained 1 000 000 x remaining expiring Contract.
3.
MTL
  1. Bastian, Nathan
  2. Oesterle, Jordan
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (CGY)
4.
CGY
  1. Phillips, Matthew
  2. 2024 4th round pick (PIT)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$75,195,833$0$1,062,500$8,304,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 25 at 2:11 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,289
Likes: 10,627
Vancouver isn't getting there 1st back there
Redmile04 liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:13 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: Gmonwy
Vancouver isn't getting there 1st back there


Maybe ours. I heard that next years draft picks are better. Hence the odd and unusual.
Feb. 25 at 2:16 p.m.
#3
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,437
Likes: 2,153
Wasn’t the Markstrom deal not getting throught cuz Conroy didn’t want to retain on Markstrom?
Feb. 25 at 2:20 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Wasn’t the Markstrom deal not getting throught cuz Conroy didn’t want to retain on Markstrom?


I feel like he's gonna have to give in at some point. Specially with hanifin and or Tanev. If he doesn't want to lose out
GuyGuyGuy liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 346
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Wasn’t the Markstrom deal not getting throught cuz Conroy didn’t want to retain on Markstrom?


I think it was because they couldn't agree on the cost of retention, not actually retaining.
NHLfan10506 and GuyGuyGuy liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:28 p.m.
#6
GREEN FIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 680
Likes: 236
No way buddy looked at the Vancouver trade and said, “ya that looks about right” 😂
theleano1 and Warpbox liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:31 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,169
Likes: 18,355
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Wasn’t the Markstrom deal not getting throught cuz Conroy didn’t want to retain on Markstrom?


At first it sounded that way…but now it appears that Conroy may have the ability to retain (been conflicting reports there). It was the size of retention and cost of retaining that broke things down.

I believe Conroy did get Fitzy to agree to put Holtz on table…and that is what prompted Conroy to ask Markstrom to waive. But at some point they did not agree on the cost of retaining (have seen different figures…from “15%” to “$2-3m” so we don’t know exactly how much was requested).

Hard to get any more information out now as it sounds that Conroy had to put a lid on the leaks after Fitzy was not happy that details got into public.
GuyGuyGuy liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:42 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 1,061
Canucks wouldn't give up Willander alone for that package, let alone add a 1st and Hoglander on top.
kingkanuck, remowilliams, sedin33 and 3 others liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:43 p.m.
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,877
Likes: 3,127
Quoting: NHLfan10506
At first it sounded that way…but now it appears that Conroy may have the ability to retain (been conflicting reports there). It was the size of retention and cost of retaining that broke things down.

I believe Conroy did get Fitzy to agree to put Holtz on table…and that is what prompted Conroy to ask Markstrom to waive. But at some point they did not agree on the cost of retaining (have seen different figures…from “15%” to “$2-3m” so we don’t know exactly how much was requested).

Hard to get any more information out now as it sounds that Conroy had to put a lid on the leaks after Fitzy was not happy that details got into public.


Lol on calgary puck they've convinced themselves the leaks are on NJDs side
Feb. 25 at 2:51 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 9,342
Quoting: Gmonwy
Vancouver isn't getting there 1st back there


You’re right we’d be getting your 1st+ back in that trade. Or Andersson

Canucks don’t move Willander alone for that package

They don’t love Hoglander straight up for Tanev

I’m not sure they’d move their 2025 1st for Tanev

That deal favours Calgary heavily
remowilliams, theleano1 and Warpbox liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:52 p.m.
#11
First round bust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 808
Likes: 323
Quoting: Gmonwy
Vancouver isn't getting there 1st back there


You're right, but I'd jump all over that deal for Tanev. The 2025 pick will most likely be higher, Willander will be a top prospect for the Flames, and Hoglander can be flipped.
Feb. 25 at 2:53 p.m.
#12
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 182
Much as I appreciate Tanev and all he did in Vancouver, he's worth a second round pick and not any more
remowilliams and Warpbox liked this.
Feb. 25 at 3:54 p.m.
#13
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 1,236
Not even close for montreal to even look into it, you're sending them 2 contacts they're not going to pick off waivers for free and savard for a 3rd ??!?! No
Feb. 25 at 4:24 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1,208
The first trade looks weird.
I don't see Vancouver trading a couple of Swedes to Calgary.
Feb. 25 at 5:01 p.m.
#15
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,042
Likes: 4,097
Vancouver isn't paying that much for a guy that doesn't want to play for Calgary, Willander for Tanev straight up is absurd let alone adding a first and Hoglander
Warpbox and Aasen6 liked this.
Feb. 25 at 7:17 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 2,227
All 3 of the pieces VAN is offering in this deal don't get moved for Tanev one for one
Aasen6 liked this.
Feb. 26 at 1:20 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 593
In what world does tanev cost more to acquire than hanifin and markstrom together?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll