mhan63

NY Rangers

Member Since

Feb. 8, 2018

Favourite Team

New York Rangers

Forum Posts

220

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22, 2020 at 12:00 p.m.

Thread: Krieder to FLA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Drop Lias and Rangers accept...

1st + Noel will probably be closer though.</div></div>

I'd rather have a prospect than Acciari. As I responded to someone else, his shooting percentage is an absurd 24.7%. His career shooting percentage before this season was 8.7%. I'm not interested in a 28 year old career 4th liner who's having a lucky season.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22, 2020 at 11:58 a.m.

Thread: Krieder to FLA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DoubleADoubleK</b></div><div>Borgstrom is looking like a bust, not a top prospect. Even trades: Borgstrom for Lias. Kreider for decent 1st. Yet we want a good prospect for Kreider more than picks. Tippett or Noel are the targets</div></div>

I don't think Borgstrom for Lias is even. Borgstrom has out produced Lias at both the NHL and AHL levels.

As for targeting Tippett, I think FLA would hang on to him because they will probably lose one of Dadonov/Hoffman this offseason, and Tippett could replace the one they lose.
For Acciari, yea he has 18 goals, but only 3 assists for 21 pts in 46 games. His shooting percentage is an absurd 24.7. His career shooting percentage before this season was 8.7%. I'm not interested in a 28 year old career 4th liner who's having a lucky season.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22, 2020 at 11:48 a.m.

Thread: Krieder to FLA

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rja</b></div><div>A) FLA likely rejects; if a first is coming back for Kreider, not much else will be coming back with it.
B) If FLA wants to make a trade they will have to send back a decent chunk of salary to the other team to stay cap compliant.</div></div>

Any short term contracts FLA would part with to make them cap compliant? Pysyk maybe?

I think Kreider is going to go for a 1st and a prospect. I'd look at the Kevin Hayes trade last deadline for a comparable.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 22, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.

Thread: LeafsNewYork

I think the Rangers are content to hold on to Staal for 1 more year, rather than sacrificing Fast and Georgiev to get rid of him.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 22, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.

Thread: god tier

It would take like 5 1st rounders, 2-3 prospects, and 2-3 roster players to make Edmonton part with the best player in the world

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 21, 2020 at 2:55 p.m.

Thread: My 3 way -TOR-STL-NYR

Rangers get absolutely nothing out of this. Trade 2 roster players and get garbage in return

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJan. 21, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.

Thread: Actual 3 team trade

Big rip off for the Rangers

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16, 2020 at 3:17 p.m.

Thread: NYR DUCKs

Lemieux isn't going to be traded. He's highly valued by the Rangers.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16, 2020 at 2:36 p.m.

Thread: Mango trade for georgiev

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Trevorchef</b></div><div>As a Leafs fan, I would make this trade. I know that won't be the popular opinion but it is a good move for both sides. The only thing that I would add would be Hutchinson to the deal and a lower round pick, (4th or lower), coming back to the Leafs.

If it were this...

<strong>To NYR: </strong>Hutchinson + Johnsson
<strong>To TOR:</strong> Georgiev + 4th

I would do it right now and drive AJ to the airport.</div></div>

If you add Hutch, the Leafs would need to add a pick, not the Rangers. He has negative value.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2020 at 3:19 p.m.

Thread: Georgiev Future Tendy

...yes... picks would need to be involved

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2020 at 3:17 p.m.

Thread: Cant lose

Why would Calgary want Jones over Rittich? Rittich has outplayed Jones the past 2 years and costs less that half of Jones. Jones has negative worth right now

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2020 at 3:10 p.m.

Thread: trade with NYR

I don't TOR is giving up enough in the NYR trade. Georgie for Bracco and a pick has been thrown around a lot. Ceci is a negative in the deal, so it's basically Kreider and Lias for Johnsson. You'd have to throw in a least a 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2020 at 2:51 p.m.

Thread: Fleece or Fair

Value seems pretty fair. I've been thinking Colorado or St. Louis may get Kreider, but interesting to see if Toronto goes big

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.

Thread: LeafsRangers Big Swap

I respectfully disagree with you, sir/madam/non-gender assuming pronoun.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 8, 2019 at 4:06 p.m.

Thread: Lanche

Georgiev is a "throw in"?!?!?! Are you serious? He keeps improving and could end up being a starter in this league for a long time.

This trade is absolutely horrible for the Rangers. They get spare parts and questions marks for 3 NHL players.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 11, 2019 at 4:37 p.m.

Thread: Blockbuster trade Nashville New Jersey

I think Hall is going to be looking for Panarin money. As long as he stays healthy and produces like he did 2 seasons ago, he'll probably get it somewhere

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 8, 2019 at 4:20 p.m.

Thread: BUFF-EDM-3way

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jimbo1119</b></div><div>From the posts here...doesn't seem Sabre fans are that thrilled with it...but from a Ranger fan perspective- what more would you want from Buffalo?</div></div>

The only guys I'd be interested in are their top young guys. Dahlin, Jokiharju, Olofsson, etc., but they're probably untouchable from Buffalo's perspective. I simply wouldn't do a deal with them

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 8, 2019 at 1:15 p.m.

Thread: would Detroit do something like this this

The Rangers should've offer sheeted AA a couple of years back

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 8, 2019 at 1:14 p.m.

Thread: BUFF-EDM-3way

The players you sent to Buffalo are better/have more potential than the players you got back. Really bad trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 8, 2019 at 1:10 p.m.

Thread: My idea

Your idea = bad idea. This team has been focusing on getting younger and growing with the kids. Instead, you ship off a bunch of talented ones for a declining Getzlaf to maybe make the playoffs this year or next.

Bad... real bad

Forum: NHL TradesOct. 8, 2019 at 12:31 p.m.

Thread: (OTT/NYR) - Ebert for Namestnikov

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>Why did we move Namestnikov? His contract is up after the year and because of the contract we got DeAngelo signed to we don't need the cap space right now.</div></div>

Gives us some more flexibility cap wise for this season. Now we can give his roster spot to someone better and more deserving, rather than having to showcase Names, who was brutal so far (and demoted to the 4th line/bench in both games).

Rangers management has set playoffs as the goal for this season. Names was not making this team better.

Forum: NHL TradesOct. 8, 2019 at 12:27 p.m.

Thread: (OTT/NYR) - Ebert for Namestnikov

I feel like a lot of the people saying the Sens won this trade haven't watched Names play recently or think of him with the Lightning, with Stamkos and Kucherov as linemates...

Names has been consistently bad for the Rangers ever since they got him. Plugging him into the 2nd line of the Sens might get him a couple more points, but any GM would be a fool to ignore his recent history. If he goes to a contender, he'll be bottom 6 again and produce nothing, while being ok on the defensive side of the puck.

Honestly, I'm surprised the Rangers didn't have to give away an incentive pick to be rid of Names. For that reason alone, the Rangers won this trade.

Forum: NHL SigningsSep. 19, 2019 at 1:44 p.m.

Thread: Ottawa Senators signed Thomas Chabot (8 Years / $8,000,000 AAV)

Wow, this is the kind of deal you wish your young stars are willing to sign. If he took a bridge deal, he could have become a 10M/year kind of guy for his next contract.

This contract could be a steal in just a couple years.

Forum: NHL SigningsSep. 12, 2019 at 10:22 a.m.

Thread: New York Rangers signed Brendan Lemieux (1 Year / $925,000 AAV)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brian2016</b></div><div>There's gotta be a trade on the horizon, right? Namestnikov or Smith?</div></div>

Smith will get get sent down to the AHL; as should McKegg. That will give the Rangers another 1.7M or so. They'll have the space to sign DeAngelo, but I do think they should move Namestnikov.

Forum: NHL SigningsSep. 12, 2019 at 9:21 a.m.

Thread: New York Rangers signed Brendan Lemieux (1 Year / $925,000 AAV)

If the Rangers had more cap space I could've seen him getting 2x1.5M or 3x2-2.5M, but this is pretty much all they could afford as it stands now. Tony D hopefully signs soon too

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

mhan63

NY Rangers

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day