SalarySwishSalarySwish

Yotes get 11 OA back

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 22, 2021
Published: Jul. 22, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,200,000
3$1,500,000
3$1,800,000
2$1,100,000
1$3,500,000
5$5,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
To any team, not AZ
2.
ARI
  1. Kurashev, Philipp
  2. 2021 1st round pick (CHI)
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (CHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$71,271,714$452,439$5,050,000$10,228,286
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 22, 2021 at 6:24 p.m.
#1
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,962
Likes: 23,975
Why do u think Garland and Dvorak combined are only worth the 11th overall and taking Seabrook. I think upgrade Kurashev to a better prospect and Arizona might be interested
justaBoss and villenash liked this.
Jul. 22, 2021 at 6:25 p.m.
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,710
Likes: 31,449
Can't see ARI giving both if they take in bad contracts. Seems to be too much in Blackhawks favor this one.
csick, OldNYIfan and villenash liked this.
Jul. 22, 2021 at 6:27 p.m.
#3
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 2,373
I think Kurashev has pretty good value. He played well this year, but his value isn't this good
csick liked this.
Jul. 22, 2021 at 6:28 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,287
Likes: 4,932
Quoting: csick
Why do u think Garland and Dvorak combined are only worth the 11th overall and taking Seabrook. I think upgrade Kurashev to a better prospect and Arizona might be interested


so drop seabrook and its good? Seabs isn't really owed much atcual cash. We dumped Hossa to AZ a few years ago basiclly for free. I don't see seabrook's contract having as much negative value as people think I guess. Moving an LTIR deal logistically helps the hawks if they plan to spend to the cap in the future. AZ basiclly never spends to the cap so it doesn't matter to them.cIt only affects the teams in the off season
csick liked this.
Jul. 22, 2021 at 6:37 p.m.
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,352
Likes: 25,266
Quoting: Wadejos123
so drop seabrook and its good? Seabs isn't really owed much atcual cash. We dumped Hossa to AZ a few years ago basiclly for free. I don't see seabrook's contract having as much negative value as people think I guess. Moving an LTIR deal logistically helps the hawks if they plan to spend to the cap in the future. AZ basiclly never spends to the cap so it doesn't matter to them.cIt only affects the teams in the off season


I think that you're off your usually accurate aim here. Leave Seabrook out of it (for purposes of this discussion). In my opinion, Dvorak is worth more than the first, and Garland is worth more than the first, but let's assume that the value is even in both cases (especially when factoring in term). Each player is surely worth more than Kurashev and the future second. Alternatively, look at it this way: Arizona trades two quality top-6 forwards who are reaching towards their peak performance years. In return, Arizona gets effectively a prospect unlikely to have the same impact as either Coyote this season and maybe next plus two draft picks, the later of which probably won't hit the NHL until 2024-2025. I can't see it.
Wadejos123 liked this.
See All