Meier and Merkley

your going to get roasted buddy!
1st deal Walsh would be far more logical than mukh. even the NJD fans say no.
Seattle might be interested in Reimer but not Nieto and Bonino and not for that price.
Nieto at best might get us a 4th Bonino a 5th
Reimer a 3rd at best he isn’t having a good year.
no one wants nutivaara, you couldn’t give him away for free

Fitz only was blocks of granite for D. Merkley makes no sense for us. The rest we can continue to argue about! 😆

Take out Muk and Merk, then add extension for Meier. Without knowing that piece, its impossible to tell what trade returns fit.

Returns would scale to contract....for example:

3 years x $6.5 million = Zetterlund, 1st
7 years x $7.0 million = Holtz, 1st, 2nd
7 years x $7.5 million = Holtz, 1st
7 years x $8.0 million = Foote, 1st, 3rd
7 years x $8.5 million = Foote, 1st, 4th
7 years x $9.0 million = Foote, 2nd, 3rd
7 years x $9.5 million = Stillman, 3rd
1 year x $10.0 million = 2nd, 3rd

I don’t think Merkley is the option of you want to increase the value coming back, if it’s from NJ.
They have practically an over abundance of d prospects already, there’s just not much sense in moving Mook to bring in Merkley. Mook also tips the value a bit over the top. Maybe a guy like Walsh instead would make sense, but I’m still just not thinking Merkley is a fit regardless

Easy pass by TB