SalarySwishSalarySwish

A kurashev trade from my perspecitve

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 20, 2024
Published: Mar. 20, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Lets say you want to capitalize on the career year that Kurashev is having right now. My preference would be to keep him for depth and to help develop the next waive of hawks which he could be apart of. However, its been discussed that maybe the hawks rebuild could be better served by trading him while his value is high. Here is my view on what that looks like.
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
  2. 2025 1st round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Carolina is suggested because Kurashev is a cost-controlled asset, not a rental, and they love to exploit draft inefficiencies with late round picks. They are not as aggressive as Tampa, so take this suggestion with pinch of salt. Really any team works.

Carolina or any other team is welcome to include a cap dump or contracts here.
CAR
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (CHI)
  2. 2026 3rd round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
Kurashev (2,250,000 x 1YL) RFA (arb.) currently 24 years old with 44 in 66GP.
2.
CHI
  1. Zegras, Trevor
Additional Details:
Trade number 2, package Kurashev and picks to upgrade for a premium asset.

I dont know if this is enough, but I do know ANA does not need LD and that is our greatest prospect surplus.
ANA
  1. 2025 1st round pick (TOR)
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Kurashev (2,250,000 x 1YL) RFA (arb.) currently 24 years old with 44 in 66GP.

2025 2nd round pick can become Chicagos own 2nd round pick if Zegras plays in X number of games.
3.
CHI
  1. Sillinger, Cole [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Trade number 3: Purely hockey trade. I dont know if its good/bad but another option to move Kurashev is a purely hockey trade that makes sense for the hawks.
CBJ
  1. Kurashev, Philipp
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
13$83,500,000$51,576,667$0$5,775,000$31,923,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Athanasiou, Andreas
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Waivers ExemptBedard, Connor
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Foligno, Nick
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Dickinson, Jason
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Hall, Taylor
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Waivers ExemptSlaggert, Landon
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Donato, Ryan
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Waivers ExemptKorchinski, Kevin
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Jones, Seth
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Mrázek, Petr
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Waivers ExemptKaiser, Wyatt
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Murphy, Connor
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
Waivers ExemptSöderblom, Arvid
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
Zegras, Trevor
$5,750,000$5,750,000 ($4,600,000$5M$4,600,000$5M)
C, LW
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 20 at 11:47 a.m.
#1
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,559
Likes: 5,044
You're in disneyland if you think Kurashev is worth this much. On ANY other team, he's not getting the ice time or quality of linemates he is in Chicago. Playing 20 minutes a night with Bedard will help point totals no problem, look at Granlund in San Jose, look in the past at guys like Dzingel, hell look at Vatrano in Anaheim. Kurashev is good, he's fine. 2 1sts, Zegras and Sillinger is DRASTICALLY overvaluing this player.
mokumboi and Viqsi liked this.
Mar. 20 at 11:50 a.m.
#2
Kyle_Davidson
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,871
Likes: 5,858
Quoting: Caniac2000
You're in disneyland if you think Kurashev is worth this much. On ANY other team, he's not getting the ice time or quality of linemates he is in Chicago. Playing 20 minutes a night with Bedard will help point totals no problem, look at Granlund in San Jose, look in the past at guys like Dzingel, hell look at Vatrano in Anaheim. Kurashev is good, he's fine. 2 1sts, Zegras and Sillinger is DRASTICALLY overvaluing this player.


Yes, I am aware that this is the most likely reaction from someone who is unfamiliar with the player and vaguely familiar with Chicago's circumstances. This post is in response to a discussion regarding trading kurashev that took place in another ACGM. As my description states I am against trading him and the values are somewhat reflective of that.
Mar. 20 at 11:54 a.m.
#3
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,559
Likes: 5,044
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Yes, I am aware that this is the most likely reaction from someone who is unfamiliar with the player and vaguely familiar with Chicago's circumstances. This post is in response to a discussion regarding trading kurashev that took place in another ACGM. As my description states I am against trading him and the values are somewhat reflective of that.


This isn't a case of the values being against trading him, with respect, getting a 1st for Kurashev right now would be impressive. He's good, he's fine you can be against trading him. I'm against the Canes trading Necas. That doesn't mean I'd expect three times his value in response. And I'm familiar enough with Kurashev to suggest, while he's been good, this is completely nuts.
mokumboi liked this.
Mar. 20 at 11:58 a.m.
#4
LukaTAG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 465
Nah he's not worth this much.
TheCoontniac liked this.
Mar. 20 at 11:59 a.m.
#5
ecupirate07
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,285
Likes: 2,971
kurashev isnt Hagel, pass
TheCoontniac and imawesome liked this.
See All