SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tanev to TOR (Realistic?)

Created by: nuxfan
Team: 2018-19 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 5, 2018
Published: Jul. 5, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Would this work?
Trades
VAN
  1. 2019 1st round pick (TOR)
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
If Tanev plays 60+ games in 2019 or if the Leafs make it to the conference finals in 2019 then the 2020 3rd becomes a 2020 1st
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,225,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Canucks maximize Tanev's trade value by retaining 50%. Pretty sure he'll take a discount to re-sign at home once his contract expires. He'll be a lot closer to his brother too (in terms of travel distance).
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VAN
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$61,987,847$852,847$1,700,000$17,512,153
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Baertschi, Sven
$3,366,666$3,366,666
LW
UFA - 3
Horvat, Bo
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 5
Eriksson, Loui
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Roussel, Antoine
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Sutter, Brandon
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
NTC
UFA - 3
Dorsett, Derek
$2,650,000$2,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Gaunce, Brendan
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Gagner, Sam
$2,835,000$2,835,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Granlund, Markus
$1,475,000$1,475,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Leipsic, Brendan
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
Beagle, Jay
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Boeser, Brock
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Schaller, Tim
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
UFA - 2
Gaudette, Adam
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Edler, Alexander
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1
Markström, Jacob
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Del Zotto, Michael
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Gudbranson, Erik
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Nilsson, Anders
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Hutton, Ben
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Biega, Alex
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 2
Pouliot, Derrick
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:31 p.m.
#1
PenGoater99
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
No thanks. Leafs can get Tanev for a C+ prospect and a 2nd
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:34 p.m.
#2
nuxfan
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 931
Likes: 75
Quoting: PenGoater99
No thanks. Leafs can get Tanev for a C+ prospect and a 2nd


No they can't
Nucks17 liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:34 p.m.
#3
Doug7004
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 144
Quoting: PenGoater99
No thanks. Leafs can get Tanev for a C+ prospect and a 2nd


Exactly! And maybe a conditional 2nd!
Trickster and NewfieQuilty liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:35 p.m.
#4
PenGoater99
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: nuxfan
No they can't


Yes, they can. And if they can't, it's not costing this much
NewfieQuilty liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:36 p.m.
#5
Jangle29
Jangle29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 832
Quoting: PenGoater99
No thanks. Leafs can get Tanev for a C+ prospect and a 2nd


No we can not. But this trade is is too much
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:42 p.m.
#6
nuxfan
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 931
Likes: 75
Ignore the 2019 2nd. I added that by accident.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:47 p.m.
#7
PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Two firsts for Tanev is way too much. That is getting into Karlsson territory and Tanev is about a 3rd the defenceman Karlsson is and that is being very kind.

That being said, I would send a first and a non roster prospect not named Liljegren for Tanev, maybe throw in another asset (3rd rounder that may upgrade to a second if he resigns) if they retain half the salary for the next 2 season.

Two firsts is way too much though. Its just not worth it at that point.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:48 p.m.
#8
NewfieQuilty
Maple Leafs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 58
Likes: 14
Quoting: nuxfan
Ignore the 2019 2nd. I added that by accident.


3rd jumping to a 1st is to much maybe if it jumped to a 2nd maybe that would work...
So a 1st and 3rd which could become a 1st and 2nd but still 50% retrained...
Maybe...
Nucks17 liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:50 p.m.
#9
ConnorMcSchulenberg
Connor
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 311
Likes: 38
Grundstrom and a 1st? That translates into 2 pretty good nhl players
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:57 p.m.
#10
nuxfan
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 931
Likes: 75
Quoting: NewfieQuilty
3rd jumping to a 1st is to much maybe if it jumped to a 2nd maybe that would work...
So a 1st and 3rd which could become a 1st and 2nd but still 50% retrained...
Maybe...


3rd to a 1st isn't too much IMO considering the Leafs success will lead to these picks being late anyways
Jul. 5, 2018 at 5:58 p.m.
#11
tmljk22
tmljk22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 371
Likes: 134
I doubt Dubas will be shopping a first rounder unless it is for a number one RHD that has no injury problems that could keep him out of the lineup
NewfieQuilty liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 6:04 p.m.
#12
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,098
Likes: 23,019
Teams do not make trades with long term trade conditions. It affects their ability to trade in the future. Leafs probably can't afford Gardiner in 2019/20 due to cap reasons. Having Tanev at 4.4m might be unaffordable too.
Leafs will have to go cheap or rather cost efficient in 2019/20 on their defence or else one of their top five forwards will have to be traded.
Despite my pleas, Canucks fans cannot find another trade partner for Tanev, which lessens his trade value even more.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 6:07 p.m.
#13
nuxfan
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 931
Likes: 75
Quoting: palhal
Teams do not make trades with long term trade conditions. It affects their ability to trade in the future. Leafs probably can't afford Gardiner in 2019/20 due to cap reasons. Having Tanev at 4.4m might be unaffordable too.
Leafs will have to go cheap or rather cost efficient in 2019/20 on their defence or else one of their top five forwards will have to be traded.
Despite my pleas, Canucks fans cannot find another trade partner for Tanev, which lessens his trade value even more.


The conditional pick is 2020 but the conditions are based upon the upcoming season. Key word is "fans" can't find another trade partner. I think irl JB will keep Tanev until the deadline at least.
Nucks17 liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 6:10 p.m.
#14
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,098
Likes: 23,019
Quoting: nuxfan
The conditional pick is 2020 but the conditions are based upon the upcoming season. Key word is "fans" can't find another trade partner. I think irl JB will keep Tanev until the deadline at least.


Think you're right about TDL trade. Tanev trade value will be highest if he's healthy and playing well.
NewfieQuilty liked this.
Jul. 5, 2018 at 11:36 p.m.
#15
Nucks17
JK123
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 167
Likes: 23
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Two firsts for Tanev is way too much. That is getting into Karlsson territory and Tanev is about a 3rd the defenceman Karlsson is and that is being very kind.

That being said, I would send a first and a non roster prospect not named Liljegren for Tanev, maybe throw in another asset (3rd rounder that may upgrade to a second if he resigns) if they retain half the salary for the next 2 season.

Two firsts is way too much though. Its just not worth it at that point.


how tf is this trade getting into karlsson territory?? SMH . Buddy karlsson worth more than a first and a conditional third
Jul. 6, 2018 at 9:18 a.m.
#16
PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Nucks17
how tf is this trade getting into karlsson territory?? SMH . Buddy karlsson worth more than a first and a conditional third


Your conditions if they are met, would net the Canucks 2 1st rounders. That is an insane price to pay for Tanev. Karlsson is going to get Ottawa likely a 1st, a 2nd, an NHLer and a top prospect. You're asking for 2 firsts which would be close to the same value as a 1st and top prospect for a guy that is a 10th the value of Karlsson.

Trim that back by at least 50% and then we can have a conversation.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll