SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Patches Joins SJ in Fair, Realistic Deal.

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2018-19 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 19, 2018
Published: Jul. 19, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$72,437,501$0$1,457,500$7,062,499
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 7
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 4
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,937,500$2,937,500
C
UFA - 2
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RW
UFA - 1
$759,167$759,167 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 8
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 2
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA - 2
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 2
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 19, 2018 at 8:28 a.m.
#1
MartianKiwi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 91
Likes: 10
Let me give you my quality, ill take your quantity.
Jul. 19, 2018 at 8:56 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
still looking for the fair and realistic part
Jul. 19, 2018 at 9:31 a.m.
#3
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,595
Likes: 3,492
The pieces that Montreal would be looking for aren’t there. You basically sent Montreal three low level roster players and a 23 year old winger who hasn’t broken out yet with a 2nd round pick.

Don’t think the value is horrible but none of that is what Montreal is looking for. Their trying to trade Pacioretty for future pieces which means prospects and picks, not low end roster players.
Jul. 19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,640
Likes: 6,771
You have to understand its not that the players your using aren't decent players. They're just not what Montreal needs in a Pacioretty trade. Either give us a top 6 center or if not, picks and prospects only. We have no use for Dillon and Karlsson. Plus as good as Labanc is, he's a winger. The wings are the one position MTL already has decent depth at. we need to fill out the other positions. Honestly Josh Norris is the only prospect MTL would covet.
Jul. 19, 2018 at 12:50 p.m.
#5
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 937
MTL would want a 1st, a top prospect (Norris or Merkley), and a top six player.

You might be able to do Norris, Donskoi, Labanc, and a 1st. However, with MTL declaring they aren't going to sign him, you might be able to remove one of those players. Not Norris and not the 1st.
Jul. 19, 2018 at 2:14 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 422
Likes: 226
Quoting: goodfella
MTL would want a 1st, a top prospect (Norris or Merkley), and a top six player.

You might be able to do Norris, Donskoi, Labanc, and a 1st. However, with MTL declaring they aren't going to sign him, you might be able to remove one of those players. Not Norris and not the 1st.


I want a billion dollars but that doesn't make it realistic. Montreal has no leverage in any Pacioretty negotiation as he is a rental and they have already said they are not interested in tendering him an extension. So unless they are planning on letting him walk for nothing, they handcuffed the return that they are going to get immensely.

Labanc (young 40 point scorer)+Balcers+2nd is as high as you can expect in a return for Patches I think. Young 2nd liner/PP specialist, high-end prospect, and a pick. Basically two guys you can immediately slot into the top 9 this season and a pick. Seems very fair given no assurances on an extension for a declining Pacioretty. If I am DW and trading for a winger, I would rather go the Eberle route instead though as he fits the team style much better than Patches.
Jul. 19, 2018 at 3:46 p.m.
#7
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 937
Quoting: Drjohnson022
I want a billion dollars but that doesn't make it realistic. Montreal has no leverage in any Pacioretty negotiation as he is a rental and they have already said they are not interested in tendering him an extension. So unless they are planning on letting him walk for nothing, they handcuffed the return that they are going to get immensely.

Labanc (young 40 point scorer)+Balcers+2nd is as high as you can expect in a return for Patches I think. Young 2nd liner/PP specialist, high-end prospect, and a pick. Basically two guys you can immediately slot into the top 9 this season and a pick. Seems very fair given no assurances on an extension for a declining Pacioretty. If I am DW and trading for a winger, I would rather go the Eberle route instead though as he fits the team style much better than Patches.


They'll have more leverage around the trade deadline when everyone has to overpay. Let me point out, I don't think he's worth what I mentioned. I think at the TDL though, someone will want him and be willing to deal. If he makes it that long. I'd prefer the Sharks not lose another prospect and 1st rounder.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll