SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Top 10 Each Position

Created by: kopiino
Team: 2018-19 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 4, 2019
Published: Jan. 4, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Goalie order probably slightly off, but its a mix of those 10.
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
66$79,500,000$362,859,023$0$4,550,000-$283,359,023
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$9,538,462$9,538,462
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,766,667$4,766,667
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,350,000$7,350,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,600,000$5,600,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,137,500$4,137,500
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,333,333$4,333,333
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,725,000$5,725,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$7,425,000$7,425,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$6,100,000$6,100,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,700,000$4,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 8
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,150,000$3,150,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:20 a.m.
#51
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: kopiino
Couts lacked any help playing as the 2C before Giroux shifted to his wing. He's a fantastic two-way center and put up career numbers last season. He's slowed down points-wise this season, yes, but his defensive game is improving and is enough to make him better than a Kuzy or Eichel


Oh I don't know, maybe because he's a top 5 two way center and is elite both offensively and defensively
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:20 a.m.
#52
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
https://ibb.co/YZ91Fhk
Tell me again how he's better than Gallagher?
I'd like to see some further proof of your claims please.
@mhockey91 you take a look as well


I’m not wasting my time arguing over Gallagher vs Rantenen haha. Corsi is a great tool to compare players, but it’s not the be all end all solution. If you seriously think Gallagher is better than rantenen, kessel etc, you gotta quit reading all these charts and watch some games
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:20 a.m.
#53
Thread Starter
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 983
Likes: 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Lmao what are you saying? Kessel is amazing. Not as great as rantenen, but still a top, elite winger in this league


Kessel isnt a top 10 winger. That's what I'm saying. I made a mistake in the team and am admitting to it
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:21 a.m.
#54
BeastMode5515
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 416
Quoting: wojme
I mean there better be. HE'S THAT GOOD. He's better than barkov and couturier.


Defense exists, y’know. You just listed two top 5 two way forwards in the league. Even then Barkov and Couturier produce at elite rates that Eichel just hasn’t shown until now. Give it time and maybe he can squeak in there. Just not now.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:21 a.m.
#55
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 461
Quoting: moli92
take marner away from tavares and hes a 60-70 point winger, yet hes 8th? whats your point?


Marner could carry his own line when Rantanen could not.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:21 a.m.
#56
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: moli92
he's easily better than gallagher, dadonov, arvidsson.

arguably better than a couple more you have above him


Let me guess, just because he's 2nd in the league in points, that automatically makes him better?
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:22 a.m.
#57
Thread Starter
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 983
Likes: 339
Quoting: wojme
I mean there better be. HE'S THAT GOOD. He's better than barkov and couturier.


Again, comparing Eichel to TWO elite two-ways. Not happening
BeastMode5515 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:23 a.m.
#58
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: BeastMode5515
I highly doubt it at this point. Also Marner’s defense and play driving and considerably superiors to Rantanen’s.


according to what? I would say rantanen's play driving is better than marners. i would also doubt that rantanen is only a 55-65 point winger without mack
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:23 a.m.
#59
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
Kessel isnt a top 10 winger. That's what I'm saying. I made a mistake in the team and am admitting to it


He is a top right 10 winger easily haha. Rantenen is just higher
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:23 a.m.
#60
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,645
Likes: 5,882
Quoting: BeastMode5515
Defense exists, y’know. You just listed two top 5 two way forwards in the league. Even then Barkov and Couturier produce at elite rates that Eichel just hasn’t shown until now. Give it time and maybe he can squeak in there. Just not now.


Shocking that someone who isn't even in their prime yet had taken time to put to big numbers. But oh wait he was close to a ppg the past two seasons even on a bottom team in the league. Y'all are jokes
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:24 a.m.
#61
Thread Starter
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 983
Likes: 339
Quoting: moli92
how do you justify patrick kane at 2nd overall? looking at that same website (https://public.tableau.com/profile/bill.comeau#!/vizhome/SkaterComparisonToolv2/Dashboard1) he is worse than rantanen.


KANE DRIVES PLAYS. He plays with Toews who's slipping and puts up elite numbers. Rantanen is carried by how good MacK is alone. Kane is the equivalent to a MacK on our first line because he is the one that makes thing happen and doesnt have the other players as good as Landy/Rants
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:24 a.m.
#62
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 461
Quoting: mhockey91
I’m not wasting my time arguing over Gallagher vs Rantenen haha. Corsi is a great tool to compare players, but it’s not the be all end all solution. If you seriously think Gallagher is better than rantenen, kessel etc, you gotta quit reading all these charts and watch some games


Eye test is prone to bias. Using analytics is a much more reliable way to evaluate players rather than just watching. You have to use both, I would say 70/30 for analytics.
BeastMode5515 and kopiino liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:25 a.m.
#63
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Marner could carry his own line when Rantanen could not.


how do you know rantanen cant carry his own line? he has never been given the chance to drive his own line (which is fine cause he is a beast with mackinnon)
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:25 a.m.
#64
BeastMode5515
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 416
Quoting: wojme
Shocking that someone who isn't even in their prime yet had taken time to put to big numbers. But oh wait he was close to a ppg the past two seasons even on a bottom team in the league. Y'all are jokes


I’m sorry how old is Eichel? Same age as McDavid correct? That’s a forwards prime. 20-23. Not sure where you got a different impression from.

Quoting: moli92
according to what? I would say rantanen's play driving is better than marners. i would also doubt that rantanen is only a 55-65 point winger without mack


Gimme uno momento
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:25 a.m.
#65
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Eye test is prone to bias. Using analytics is a much more reliable way to evaluate players rather than just watching. You have to use both, I would say 70/30 for analytics.


Eye test, points, and analytics. It’s a combo of all 3
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:25 a.m.
#66
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 461
Quoting: mhockey91
He is a top right 10 winger easily haha. Rantenen is just higher


Neither are top 10 wingers.
kopiino liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:26 a.m.
#67
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: mhockey91
Eye test, points, and analytics. It’s a combo of all 3


Points don't determine how good a player is.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:26 a.m.
#68
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: kopiino
KANE DRIVES PLAYS. He plays with Toews who's slipping and puts up elite numbers. Rantanen is carried by how good MacK is alone. Kane is the equivalent to a MacK on our first line because he is the one that makes thing happen and doesnt have the other players as good as Landy/Rants


rantanen drives plays too. how do you justify gallagher over rantanen with your chart then ignore the chart when i use it for my argument?
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:27 a.m.
#69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Neither are top 10 wingers.


They easily are haha. Kessel had 91 points last year, is close to 90 Point pace this year, and has been lethal in Pens back to back cup runs. Not even including all his sucesss on the leafs. Don’t even need to speak about how good rantenen is
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:27 a.m.
#70
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: PenGoater99
Points don't determine how good a player is.


Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:28 a.m.
#71
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Who knew one simple post would cause so many arguments
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:28 a.m.
#72
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 461
Quoting: moli92
rantanen drives plays too. how do you justify gallagher over rantanen with your chart then ignore the chart when i use it for my argument?


Gallagher crushes Rantanen in xGA, relTM XG%, relTM CF%, CF%, and he does it with a significantly lower QoT.
BeastMode5515 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:29 a.m.
#73
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 461
Quoting: mhockey91
Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha


so Rantanen is the 2nd best player in the league?
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:30 a.m.
#74
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
so Rantanen is the 2nd best player in the league?


No of course not, like I said you use a combo of 3 methods. He’s certainly a top 10 RW tho
Jan. 5, 2019 at 12:30 a.m.
#75
Analytics are good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 962
Quoting: mhockey91
Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha


Um no, it's not. Prime example: Mikko Rantanen
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll