SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Petro for a Top 10 1st

Created by: STLEx32
Team: 2019-20 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 26, 2019
Published: Mar. 26, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Next year is the last year of Petro’s contract. He turns 30 next year and will need an expensive contract in years where players start to decline. Trade him for the Oilers first round pick (they haven’t had any luck with one in recent memory) and prospects. Edmonton gets the dman they have needed and St. Louis gets a 1st rounder (in the top 10ish) and 4th rounder in 2019 which they didn’t have.

Allen’s time in St. Louis is over. Carolina has McElhinney a UFA this summer and Mrazek, as well as Darling who has struggled far worse than Allen. None you want to put a full load on. Jake could use a change of scenery and the east coast bunch of jerks may be the best landing place for him to be a 1A with Mrazek. Elliott is signed to mentor Binnington and have a proven backup.

Tried to keep the team the same throughout even with UFA/RFA signings. Almost 9mil left in cap so there is a lot that could be done. Not a huge fan of randomly signing big names that most likely won’t sign in STL. More depth needs to be signed in AHL so maybe more like 5mil will be available...
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,500,000
2$1,500,000
3$3,000,000
2$800,000
1$850,000
1$950,000
1$1,000,000
4$2,250,000
1$850,000
1$800,000
1$700,000
$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$700,000
2$2,250,000
1$2,000,000
1$3,000,000
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2019 3rd round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Allen, Jake
  2. 2019 7th round pick (STL)
2.
STL
  1. Bear, Ethan
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [RFA Rights]
  3. 2019 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2019 4th round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Pietrangelo, Alex
Additional Details:
Petro signs extension with EDM
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the STL
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2021
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,000,000$63,812,927$12,928$665,000$18,187,073
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,125,000$5,125,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$758,333$758,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$722,500$722,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,375,000$1,375,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 26, 2019 at 11:52 p.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,752
Likes: 31,471
Petro has 0 reasons to sign an extension with EDM... They can't be successful and or can't pay any more than other teams...
STLBlues17 liked this.
Mar. 26, 2019 at 11:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
pair him w/Reinhart and he signs for 8
Mar. 26, 2019 at 11:53 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
The Oilers do that deal I believe
Mar. 26, 2019 at 11:55 p.m.
#4
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Petro won’t sign, but I like this rationale. I think Florida would be a team that could make sense for a high-pick for Pietrangelo trade.
STLEx32 liked this.
Mar. 26, 2019 at 11:59 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
STLex32
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 2
Its more for the idea... Who knows where players want to be? McDavid is a player anyone would want to play with and Edmonton has a huge fan base. Not sure if he would do it or not, but I would rather give Parayko the bump to the top pair and use money elsewhere and get a 1st for Petro.
Mar. 27, 2019 at 12:26 a.m.
#6
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,338
Likes: 9,079
Edmonton needs their picks, an aging AP doesnt help and kills their cap
Mar. 27, 2019 at 12:50 a.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,384
Likes: 7,064
Quoting: STLEx32
Its more for the idea... Who knows where players want to be? McDavid is a player anyone would want to play with and Edmonton has a huge fan base. Not sure if he would do it or not, but I would rather give Parayko the bump to the top pair and use money elsewhere and get a 1st for Petro.


No trade clauses were invented for Edmonton. No...petro won’t sign there
GenXHockey and justaBoss liked this.
Mar. 27, 2019 at 12:54 a.m.
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: STLBlues17
Petro won’t sign, but I like this rationale. I think Florida would be a team that could make sense for a high-pick for Pietrangelo trade.


Petro in Florida makes zero sense. They have ekblad Yandle and Matheson. They need team defence. Don’t see petro waiving to go to a non playoff team.

Think this is something that blues fans need to realize. There are very few teams that Petro can be moved to. They have to have cap space (or you take cap back) they need to be a contender and most importantly they must have a need at that position. Colorado might be a go if they move Barrie but I think they need to address depth scoring. Toronto and Tampa both have a need and contending team but you would need to take cap back. Vegas certainly has cap issues. Don’t think they would be in the market with all of their new acquisitions but that’s a maybe. Am I missing anyone?
Mar. 27, 2019 at 1:06 a.m.
#9
Sam
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 2,188
Quoting: Jamiepo
Petro in Florida makes zero sense. They have ekblad Yandle and Matheson. They need team defence. Don’t see petro waiving to go to a non playoff team.

Think this is something that blues fans need to realize. There are very few teams that Petro can be moved to. They have to have cap space (or you take cap back) they need to be a contender and most importantly they must have a need at that position. Colorado might be a go if they move Barrie but I think they need to address depth scoring. Toronto and Tampa both have a need and contending team but you would need to take cap back. Vegas certainly has cap issues. Don’t think they would be in the market with all of their new acquisitions but that’s a maybe. Am I missing anyone?


These are all good points but I do think Florida would have an interest in Pietrangelo given just how horrid that defense has been this year. Honestly, it’s probably worth it to lock up Pietrangelo long-term and just roll with the team that Armstrong built. Obviously 8 years for a guy turning 30 is scary but perhaps they can keep the term lower.
Mar. 27, 2019 at 1:13 a.m.
#10
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Jamiepo
Petro in Florida makes zero sense. They have ekblad Yandle and Matheson. They need team defence. Don’t see petro waiving to go to a non playoff team.

Think this is something that blues fans need to realize. There are very few teams that Petro can be moved to. They have to have cap space (or you take cap back) they need to be a contender and most importantly they must have a need at that position. Colorado might be a go if they move Barrie but I think they need to address depth scoring. Toronto and Tampa both have a need and contending team but you would need to take cap back. Vegas certainly has cap issues. Don’t think they would be in the market with all of their new acquisitions but that’s a maybe. Am I missing anyone?


They don’t necessarily have to have a need at that position, I mean Vegas doesn’t have trouble scoring yet they picked up Stone, Leafs need defense not fwrds yet they got Tavares (that one is different cause it didn’t cost assets but still) what they need to have is a want to boost something that is already a strength, so for that reason I’d say Winnipeg could call (again cap would have to come back) also PIT and WSH... two more teams with cap troubles, and one interesting idea I had would be VAN if they win a draft lottery, if they win a Lottery VAN can pull out of this rebuild in a hurry and won’t have cap troubles yet, if Petro wanted to go to VAN and was convinced they are on their way up that could be a fit to play with Hughes, Tanev and Edler in their Top 4
Mar. 27, 2019 at 3:51 a.m.
#11
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 931
Yeah Edmonton doesn’t have any cap space. Especially not 6.5 million, which would turn into 8 or 9 with an extension. So that’s not going to work!
Mar. 27, 2019 at 9:12 a.m.
#12
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Hackadart
They don’t necessarily have to have a need at that position, I mean Vegas doesn’t have trouble scoring yet they picked up Stone, Leafs need defense not fwrds yet they got Tavares (that one is different cause it didn’t cost assets but still) what they need to have is a want to boost something that is already a strength, so for that reason I’d say Winnipeg could call (again cap would have to come back) also PIT and WSH... two more teams with cap troubles, and one interesting idea I had would be VAN if they win a draft lottery, if they win a Lottery VAN can pull out of this rebuild in a hurry and won’t have cap troubles yet, if Petro wanted to go to VAN and was convinced they are on their way up that could be a fit to play with Hughes, Tanev and Edler in their Top 4


Stone is much more than scoring, Toronto let their 2c walk in ufa. As far as a rental goes yes I could see some teams wanting to boost a position but would Washington want to re sign petro? Probably not. So yes maybe not a need but a want in some cases. How much are teams in a position like that willing to give up?

Winnipeg could move Trouba since they are going to lose him in FA so that might be a spot. Vancouver is another team that might be a destination for the reasons you mentioned.
Hackadart liked this.
Mar. 27, 2019 at 10:55 a.m.
#13
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: STLBlues17
These are all good points but I do think Florida would have an interest in Pietrangelo given just how horrid that defense has been this year. Honestly, it’s probably worth it to lock up Pietrangelo long-term and just roll with the team that Armstrong built. Obviously 8 years for a guy turning 30 is scary but perhaps they can keep the term lower.


Yup, I think 5-6 years would be the term on his next deal.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll