SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vancouver Canucks 202223 Stanley Cup Champions

Created by: JimBenning
Team: 2019-20 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 18, 2019
Published: Jun. 18, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Canucks wait-out Spooner, Sutter and Schaller contracts. Assuming Edler signs without a NMC or NTC, he gets traded in the 2019/20 trade deadline or offseason, for a late 1st Round Pick or a 2nd. And as soon as DiPietro is ready for the NHL, Jones either gets traded or bought out to make room. Until then he serves as a back-up for Demko.

2020 is a deep draft. With 4 picks (or 5, if Edler gets traded) in the Top 62, the Canucks should be able to build a good core, and that's already with somebody like Peyton Krebs drafted in 2019.

After Krebs and the 2020 draft class mature and enter the 2022/23 season, the Canucks will be ready for a deep playoff run. And hopefully win the Stanley Cup.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,500,000
2$1,500,000
3$2,200,000
4$3,500,000
4$2,100,000
3$1,900,000
2$1,100,000
2$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,500,000
7$11,500,000
3$1,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Krebs, Peyton
3$900,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2020 7th round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Baertschi, Sven
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. 2020 4th round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Jones, Martin
  2. Roy, Jérémy
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (SJS)
  4. 2021 7th round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
If Jacob Markström re-signs with the San Jose Sharks, the 2021 7th round pick turns into the 2021 4th round pick.
SJS
  1. Markström, Jacob
  2. 2021 4th round pick (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (FLA)
  2. 2021 4th round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Tanev, Christopher
  2. 2020 6th round pick (VAN)
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VAN
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$83,000,000$80,356,879$0$6,132,500$2,643,121

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$11,500,000$11,500,000
LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,200,000$2,200,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,325,000$2,325,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$1,450,000$1M)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$827,500$827,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$675,000$675,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 18, 2019 at 2:45 a.m.
#1
Watty1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 58
They've got to move Sutter. But I agree they will probably just bury Spooner. Schaller is going to replace Roussel who will be out until December, and then I expect Schaller is either demoted or moved.
JimBenning liked this.
Jun. 18, 2019 at 3:10 a.m.
#2
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
The Sharks trade is really funny. Well done.
Jun. 18, 2019 at 3:21 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Vancouver Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 120
Likes: 16
Quoting: goodfella
The Sharks trade is really funny. Well done.


Do you like the trade? I think it's good for both teams. The Canucks help the Sharks with their cap, and give them a much better goalie. The Sharks allowed too many easy goals in the playoffs, Markstrom will be a huge help in the back-end. He was a wall for the Canucks for most of the season. On top of that, the Canucks give them the 4th round pick to sweeten the deal. Since they'd have to give up Roy (who I don't think they need, since their D is stacked), a 2nd and 7th (or 4th, if Markstrom re-signs).
Jun. 18, 2019 at 3:34 a.m.
#4
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
Quoting: Pahul
Do you like the trade? I think it's good for both teams. The Canucks help the Sharks with their cap, and give them a much better goalie. The Sharks allowed too many easy goals in the playoffs, Markstrom will be a huge help in the back-end. He was a wall for the Canucks for most of the season. On top of that, the Canucks give them the 4th round pick to sweeten the deal. Since they'd have to give up Roy (who I don't think they need, since their D is stacked), a 2nd and 7th (or 4th, if Markstrom re-signs).


That trade is terrible for the Sharks. Jones is better than Markstrom even with an off year. Roy is still a good defensive prospect despite the injury he had. Plus we give up two picks and one is a 2nd? I'd rather just ship out Braun for a pick.
Pharow liked this.
Jun. 18, 2019 at 3:49 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Vancouver Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 120
Likes: 16
Quoting: goodfella
That trade is terrible for the Sharks. Jones is better than Markstrom even with an off year. Roy is still a good defensive prospect despite the injury he had. Plus we give up two picks and one is a 2nd? I'd rather just ship out Braun for a pick.


You're telling me a guy, who played with possibly the best D in the NHL, and had a GAA of 2.96 and SVS% of 0.896 is better than Jacob Markstrom, who pretty much was a wall for the Vancouver Canucks. And despite all the efforts from the Canucks to tank, he was still single-handedly winning us games. The nucks had the worst D in the NHL, after Ottawa. If he played for the Sharks, Blues or the Flames, he would be a contender for the Vezina. And dude, Jeremy Roy's AHL numbers aren't all that great, he is a project. It will be at least another season or two before he's ready for the NHL. Also, it isn't like the Sharks need him anyways. And I added the 2nd because that Jones cap-hit could be a major pain in the ass for a long time, especially if he continues the way he's playing. If he couldn't get it done with the best D in the NHL in San Jose, he isn't going to do it with the dumpster fire of a D in Vancouver. The 2nd round pick is insurance. The 7th (or 4th) is just there, if Markstrom signs long term.

But anyways, if Wilson still isn't happy with my offer, we could always add another 4th (in 2021). Or maybe he'd be interested in taking back Goldobin. He is cheap, scores 30+ points a season and can shoot. He sucks defensively though, but he is a good Bottom 6 forward.
Jun. 18, 2019 at 3:57 a.m.
#6
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
Quoting: Pahul
You're telling me a guy, who played with possibly the best D in the NHL, and had a GAA of 2.96 and SVS% of 0.896 is better than Jacob Markstrom, who pretty much was a wall for the Vancouver Canucks. And despite all the efforts from the Canucks to tank, he was still single-handedly winning us games. The nucks had the worst D in the NHL, after Ottawa. If he played for the Sharks, Blues or the Flames, he would be a contender for the Vezina. And dude, Jeremy Roy's AHL numbers aren't all that great, he is a project. It will be at least another season or two before he's ready for the NHL. Also, it isn't like the Sharks need him anyways. And I added the 2nd because that Jones cap-hit could be a major pain in the ass for a long time, especially if he continues the way he's playing. If he couldn't get it done with the best D in the NHL in San Jose, he isn't going to do it with the dumpster fire of a D in Vancouver. The 2nd round pick is insurance. The 7th (or 4th) is just there, if Markstrom signs long term.

But anyways, if Wilson still isn't happy with my offer, we could always add another 4th (in 2021). Or maybe he'd be interested in taking back Goldobin. He is cheap, scores 30+ points a season and can shoot. He sucks defensively though, but he is a good Bottom 6 forward.


Quoting: Pahul
You're telling me a guy, who played with possibly the best D in the NHL, and had a GAA of 2.96 and SVS% of 0.896 is better than Jacob Markstrom, who pretty much was a wall for the Vancouver Canucks. And despite all the efforts from the Canucks to tank, he was still single-handedly winning us games. The nucks had the worst D in the NHL, after Ottawa. If he played for the Sharks, Blues or the Flames, he would be a contender for the Vezina. And dude, Jeremy Roy's AHL numbers aren't all that great, he is a project. It will be at least another season or two before he's ready for the NHL. Also, it isn't like the Sharks need him anyways. And I added the 2nd because that Jones cap-hit could be a major pain in the ass for a long time, especially if he continues the way he's playing. If he couldn't get it done with the best D in the NHL in San Jose, he isn't going to do it with the dumpster fire of a D in Vancouver. The 2nd round pick is insurance. The 7th (or 4th) is just there, if Markstrom signs long term.

But anyways, if Wilson still isn't happy with my offer, we could always add another 4th (in 2021). Or maybe he'd be interested in taking back Goldobin. He is cheap, scores 30+ points a season and can shoot. He sucks defensively though, but he is a good Bottom 6 forward.


I do think Jones is better, yes. The Sharks defense was awful last year. Despite their offensive talents. I watched a lot of games, it was actually a little funny.

I don't see the trade happening and I do believe it's heavily weighted towards the Canucks.
Billy739 and Pharow liked this.
Jun. 18, 2019 at 5:18 a.m.
#7
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
Quoting: Pahul
You're telling me a guy, who played with possibly the best D in the NHL, and had a GAA of 2.96 and SVS% of 0.896 is better than Jacob Markstrom, who pretty much was a wall for the Vancouver Canucks. And despite all the efforts from the Canucks to tank, he was still single-handedly winning us games. The nucks had the worst D in the NHL, after Ottawa. If he played for the Sharks, Blues or the Flames, he would be a contender for the Vezina. And dude, Jeremy Roy's AHL numbers aren't all that great, he is a project. It will be at least another season or two before he's ready for the NHL. Also, it isn't like the Sharks need him anyways. And I added the 2nd because that Jones cap-hit could be a major pain in the ass for a long time, especially if he continues the way he's playing. If he couldn't get it done with the best D in the NHL in San Jose, he isn't going to do it with the dumpster fire of a D in Vancouver. The 2nd round pick is insurance. The 7th (or 4th) is just there, if Markstrom signs long term.

But anyways, if Wilson still isn't happy with my offer, we could always add another 4th (in 2021). Or maybe he'd be interested in taking back Goldobin. He is cheap, scores 30+ points a season and can shoot. He sucks defensively though, but he is a good Bottom 6 forward.


i think you're doing mental olympics to try to make it seem like Markstrom's worth more then a 3rd round pick
i reality jones i worth more because he's actually done something , been to the playoffs and had success .
Markstrom on the other hand has always played on a bottom feeding team and never stood out despite lack of competition .

this trade is like EDM moving Talbot for Elliotte , Mathew Strome , 2nd and a 7th round pick
when in reality Talbot was only worth Anthony Stolarz

if VAN is lucky they can trade Markstrom for Dell
but there is no chance for Jones going that low
Jun. 18, 2019 at 6:30 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Markstrom is a average goalie that had a good year on a poor team! But the year before he was awful. There a lot of goalie like that on free agency why would they send roy and 2 pick when you could sign talbot or kinkaid or mason they all add one good year
Jun. 18, 2019 at 6:56 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,043
Likes: 7,746
Career NHL

Markstrom .909 Sv% in 229 GP
Jones .912 Sv% in 286 GP

Career AHL

Markstrom .920 Sv% in 165 GP
Jones .921 Sv% in 158 GP

The biggest difference? Jones has faced 28 shots/60 in the NHL, Markstrom has faced 31 s/60. They are comparable talents, Jones is getting $5.75M x 5 on a cap-strapped team, Markstrom's contract is $3.66M x 1. I can clearly see what the OP is trying to do here and it makes some sense for both teams. I don't think SJS should have to give up the extra picks though.
JimBenning liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll