SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Matthews is the worst bridge deal ever signed

Created by: claytron8000
Team: 2019-20 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 25, 2019
Published: Sep. 25, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Less points than Tkachuk, 4.3M higher AAV, and a UFA at expiry.

Fight me
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$72,723,376$0$140,000$8,776,624

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$715,000$715,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$735,000$735,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
What was the worst bridge contract signed this summer?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 25, 2019 at 12:53 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: claytron8000
It says right in the title.


You can't put punctuation in titles so Matthew's and Matthews' would both come out the same. Considering this is post is about Matthew Tkachuk, it is confusing
Sep. 25, 2019 at 12:53 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,490
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Is 5 years considered a bridge contract?


In my books 1-3 is bridge, 4-6 is short Term and 6-8 is long Term ( 6 being a matter of subjective perception ). Matthews deal sucks as OP perfectly described it below

Quoting: claytron8000
What’s incredible is the Leafs gave up control, didn’t get long term, and didn’t get any savings on AAV despite the first two concessions. Worst of all worlds.
claytron8000 and CN10 liked this.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 12:55 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: Laudan
In my books 1-3 is bridge, 4-6 is short Term and 6-8 is long Term ( 6 being a matter of subjective perception ). Matthews deal suck as you perfectly described it below


I'm having a lot of fun, but this is really my point at the end of the day.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 1:02 p.m.
#29
Caps fan idk why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 11,298
Likes: 4,367
Quoting: BCAPP
I can't stand this false statement about him not performing in the playoffs

He's played 3 playoffs with the Leafs
4 g and 5 pts in 6 gp his first playoffs
1 g and 2 pts in 7 gp in his second playoffs <--played bad as he was shutdown by Bergeron
5 g and 6 pts in 7 GP in his third playoffs

He has played well in 2/3 of his playoffs. He was shutdown by Bergeron in one of them. I'm not arguing that that is inconsequential, but it isn't unique. Bergeron is that damn good.


13 points in 20games isn’t great for an “elite” level player. Also his game 5-7 stats are terrible. Elimination games
Sep. 25, 2019 at 1:09 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
5 years is absolutely not a bridge deal
BCAPP liked this.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 1:10 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: Capitalfail67
13 points in 20games isn’t great for an “elite” level player. Also his game 5-7 stats are terrible. Elimination games


Again its based on him being shut down in one series, outside of that its 11 pts/13 GP which is fine. AS well it is still 10 g in 20 GP.

But I'll trust you in the elimination thing, I don't remember that offhand
Sep. 25, 2019 at 1:37 p.m.
#32
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Quoting: claytron8000
hooleeee smokes back up the Brinks truck


bud i wouldn't be chirping about the playoffs since everyone on the flames was non-existent.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 1:59 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: mondo
bud i wouldn't be chirping about the playoffs since everyone on the flames was non-existent.


This group of Flames has actually won a few playoff series, something the Leafs haven't done since before the 04/05 lockout.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 2:10 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
The Matthews deal was bad, but the Tkachuk deal is much worse.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
#35
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: Pensfan89
The Matthews deal was bad, but the Tkachuk deal is much worse.


Just awful for the Flames to get more points and retain player control for 4.3M less than Matthews
Sep. 25, 2019 at 2:26 p.m.
#36
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Quoting: claytron8000
This group of Flames has actually won a few playoff series, something the Leafs haven't done since before the 04/05 lockout.


flames have only won a single playoff series since the lockout.

i know the leafs aren't exactly better, but at least they're able to win some games.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 2:32 p.m.
#37
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: claytron8000
Those players were/are both better than Matthews, who has crested 70 pts once. Both players had 2 100+ pt seasons by that time. Both players actually had more assists in a season than Matthews has a career high in points by that time.


And they got paid more for doing it. it's not like his contract is unusual.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 2:36 p.m.
#38
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: TML1991
And they got paid more for doing it. it's not like his contract is unusual.


60% of the points, should be 60% of the cap share if that's the argument (ie. 10% of cap)
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:04 p.m.
#39
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: claytron8000
60% of the points, should be 60% of the cap share if that's the argument (ie. 10% of cap)


fair point, but you should probably use points per game instead of total points.

I'll compare to malkin, because let's be honest, crosby is in a completely different tier than pretty much every player other than ovi.

If you do that and compare it to Malkin, it's more like 81% of ppg (Malkin at 1.19 PPG, and Matthews at 0.98 PPG) at time of signing for like 90% of the cap hit. which kind of makes sense. I wouldnt expect cap hit's to work linearly, probably a bit more of an S shape trend, with players that can produce 0 to 30 points getting paid nothing, with a ramp up from 30 to 70 ish points, and then 70 plus starting to level off.

Matthews PPG rates put him as an 80 point player on average for his first 3 seasons.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:12 p.m.
#40
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: TML1991
fair point, but you should probably use points per game instead of total points.

I'll compare to malkin, because let's be honest, crosby is in a completely different tier than pretty much every player other than ovi.

If you do that and compare it to Malkin, it's more like 81% of ppg (Malkin at 1.19 PPG, and Matthews at 0.98 PPG) at time of signing for like 90% of the cap hit. which kind of makes sense. I wouldnt expect cap hit's to work linearly, probably a bit more of an S shape trend, with players that can produce 0 to 30 points getting paid nothing, with a ramp up from 30 to 70 ish points, and then 70 plus starting to level off.

Matthews PPG rates put him as an 80 point player on average for his first 3 seasons.


He needs to actually stay healthy and play the games
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:16 p.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: claytron8000
Just awful for the Flames to get more points and retain player control for 4.3M less than Matthews


Matthews is over a ppg player. Tkachuk isn’t even a ppg player. So yes the flames contract to Tkachuk is awful. Matthews only played 68 games last year and scored only 4 fewer points. Since he is over a ppg player, he would have gotten at least 12 more points had he played the same number of games as Tkachuk. Plus Matthews is a center which is exponentially more valuable than a LW.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:26 p.m.
#42
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: Pensfan89
Matthews is over a ppg player. Tkachuk isn’t even a ppg player. So yes the flames contract to Tkachuk is awful. Matthews only played 68 games last year and scored only 4 fewer points. Since he is over a ppg player, he would have gotten at least 12 more points had he played the same number of games as Tkachuk. Plus Matthews is a center which is exponentially more valuable than a LW.


4.3M for 12 pts. That's some serious value.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:29 p.m.
#43
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: claytron8000
He needs to actually stay healthy and play the games


2007/2008 crosby just had a 72 point season, and looking for his first real contract. He clearly regressed hard from his 100 point rookie and sophmore seasons, down to a 72 point player. He needs to actually stay healthy and play the games, 72 points isnt worth 17.30% of the cap.

That Matthew Tkachuk though, what a player, he improved from a 40 ish point guy to a 77 point player. 77 points is better than crosby's 72 points, and he's heading in the right direction. He should get paid more than Crosby.

/s
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:37 p.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: claytron8000
4.3M for 12 pts. That's some serious value.


Quoting: TML1991
2007/2008 crosby just had a 72 point season, and looking for his first real contract. He clearly regressed hard from his 100 point rookie and sophmore seasons, down to a 72 point player. He needs to actually stay healthy and play the games, 72 points isnt worth 17.30% of the cap.

That Matthew Tkachuk though, what a player, he improved from a 40 ish point guy to a 77 point player. 77 points is better than crosby's 72 points, and he's heading in the right direction. He should get paid more than Crosby.

/s


Ok no point in discussing with stupid trolls who lack the brain cells required to have a legit discussion on this. Carry on

This is a dig at the OP, not the 2nd comment btw. Just used it to show the road this is going down.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:40 p.m.
#45
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: Pensfan89
Ok no point in discussing with stupid trolls who lack the brain cells required to have a legit discussion on this. Carry on


dude im on your side, i'm just pointing out how ridiculous claytron8000 is using point totals and not caring about points per game, contract term, and using a player's entire career up to signing.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:44 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: TML1991
dude im on your side, i'm just pointing out how ridiculous claytron8000 is using point totals and not caring about points per game, contract term, and using a player's entire career up to signing.


I know that’s why I put the second part lol.
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:47 p.m.
#47
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: Pensfan89
I know that’s why I put the second part lol.


gotcha. that was an edit though right?
Sep. 25, 2019 at 3:49 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: TML1991
gotcha. that was an edit though right?


Yeah, I edited right away cause I right away saw how that would be confusing lol
Sep. 25, 2019 at 5:06 p.m.
#49
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 618
Likes: 104
Quoting: TML1991
2007/2008 crosby just had a 72 point season, and looking for his first real contract. He clearly regressed hard from his 100 point rookie and sophmore seasons, down to a 72 point player. He needs to actually stay healthy and play the games, 72 points isnt worth 17.30% of the cap.

That Matthew Tkachuk though, what a player, he improved from a 40 ish point guy to a 77 point player. 77 points is better than crosby's 72 points, and he's heading in the right direction. He should get paid more than Crosby. Also, no way am I saying Tkachuk is worth more than Crosby.

/s


Crosby's 2 seasons prior he had 102 and 120 points, and he actually missed fewer games due to injury than Matthews his first 3 seasons.
Sep. 26, 2019 at 10:22 a.m.
#50
TML1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 685
Likes: 153
Quoting: claytron8000
Crosby's 2 seasons prior he had 102 and 120 points, and he actually missed fewer games due to injury than Matthews his first 3 seasons.


but that tkachuk guy clearly was better than crosby in each of their respective 3rd seasons. 77 points vs 72 poitns. just no comparison, and trending in the right direction. Tkachuk is better than crosby /s
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit