SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realization

Created by: HatterTParty
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 27, 2019
Published: Dec. 27, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I woke up this morning and listened to the most recent Blackhawks podcast episode with Pat Boyle. I came to a few realizations when the subject of boqvist and dach going to the world juniors came. The hosts were basically split on them going, especially with the injuries the team has accrued. But then they brought up a point about Kane and toews. Essentially, they thought that letting them go would be a negative sign to Kane and toews.

My question is, will Kane and toews ever accept that they can’t win another cup? Will they ever realize this is honestly better off long term with a rebuild? My simple answer is no they won’t. Hence, let’s see what can be gained from trading them. If they don’t want to buy into the solution, they become part of the problem.

This team would be incredibly young and very green, but they have great speed, some have size, and there’s plenty of picks to go off of in the next few drafts. Plus defense is hopefully coming soon.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Turcotte, Alex [Reserve List]
LAK
  1. Dach, Kirby
Additional Details:
This will never happen, but I’ll always wish this happened. Also no one, to this day, has proved to me ability wise why he’s better than turcotte or byram.
2.
CHI
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Fleury, Haydn
  3. 2020 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2020 3rd round pick (BUF)
CAR
  1. Kane, Patrick ($4,000,000 retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Lehkonen, Artturi
  2. Suzuki, Nick
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (CHI)
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
MTL
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($4,000,000 retained)
4.
CHI
  1. 2020 4th round pick (PIT)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (PIT)
5.
CHI
TOR
  1. Lehner, Robin ($2,500,000 retained)
  2. Nylander, Alexander
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
26$81,500,000$62,510,019$0$5,452,500$18,989,981
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,833$775,833 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:30 p.m.
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
How does lehner and nylander get twice as much as Kane?
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:36 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
No way do we sell Kane that low not to mention retaining $4M. That is a horrible return. Kane is easily worth (2) 1st round picks and a prospect like Suzuki from Carolina. Even then that is without retaining $4M.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 391
Likes: 143
hell yeah seabrook and ceci. negative-seven WAR of defensemen for 11 million dollars on the same team. you simply love to see it.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:47 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 280
Quoting: grok
hell yeah seabrook and ceci. negative-seven WAR of defensemen for 11 million dollars on the same team. you simply love to see it.


Over the last 2.5 seasons Brooks is at -2.7 WAR and Ceci's at -0.4 WAR. I think you're overreacting. Source
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:49 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: Jamiepo
How does lehner and nylander get twice as much as Kane?


Quoting: ChiHawk
No way do we sell Kane that low not to mention retaining $4M. That is a horrible return. Kane is easily worth (2) 1st round picks and a prospect like Suzuki from Carolina. Even then that is without retaining $4M.


Whoa whoa, okay, first of all, we’re getting fleury and bean from Carolina, both are A prospects, if you wanna switch out one, go for it. A first and a third is more than fair, but I’d say the two firsts plus the two players would scare Carolina away. Sooooo, I chose the two top notch defenders WE NEED and a first as opposed to two first round picks we may **** up.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:51 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: grok
hell yeah seabrook and ceci. negative-seven WAR of defensemen for 11 million dollars on the same team. you simply love to see it.


Quoting: MacerV
Over the last 2.5 seasons Brooks is at -2.7 WAR and Ceci's at -0.4 WAR. I think you're overreacting. Source


Also, Ceci won’t play a game for the hawks. He’s gone end of year. Plus, seabrook, in my mind, has played his last game as a hawk. He’s either bought out, or I’m always down for the Eriksson for seabrook trade and buying out Eriksson (LOUI ERIKSSON).
Dec. 27, 2019 at 12:55 p.m.
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: HatterTParty
Whoa whoa, okay, first of all, we’re getting fleury and bean from Carolina, both are A prospects, if you wanna switch out one, go for it. A first and a third is more than fair, but I’d say the two firsts plus the two players would scare Carolina away. Sooooo, I chose the two top notch defenders WE NEED and a first as opposed to two first round picks we may **** up.


Just wondering what your rational was on the Toronto Trade?

Mikheyev is a Calder contender, kapanen is certainly worth more than a first. Giving up an rhd where we are very thin for a borderline nhler (not a 200 ft player) and a rental goalie.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 1:15 p.m.
#8
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,654
Likes: 12,372
Quoting: HatterTParty
Whoa whoa, okay, first of all, we’re getting fleury and bean from Carolina, both are A prospects, if you wanna switch out one, go for it. A first and a third is more than fair, but I’d say the two firsts plus the two players would scare Carolina away. Sooooo, I chose the two top notch defenders WE NEED and a first as opposed to two first round picks we may **** up.


Fleury can't be considered an A prospect at this point if he ever could've been.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 1:54 p.m.
#9
Zuke is the goat
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 1,571
0 chance MTL trade Suzuki... Especially for an overpaid and old C. We're set at C (especially with Zuke). That trade is laughable
Dec. 27, 2019 at 1:55 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: Jamiepo
Just wondering what your rational was on the Toronto Trade?

Mikheyev is a Calder contender, kapanen is certainly worth more than a first. Giving up an rhd where we are very thin for a borderline nhler (not a 200 ft player) and a rental goalie.


No problem.

Okay, so, with Kapanen, a lot of the cap space movement issues I've heard regarding the leafs involves moving either Johnsson or Kapanen to free up room. Moving Ceci makes sense in my mind only cuz that's more cap space and no one in Toronto seems to like him. As for Mikheyev, yea its a bit of a stretch. Great contract, good numbers, good size and even better speed. I like him a lot!!!

In return, I figured having Lehner would make him a dependable back up that Andersen can depend on to get some rest. Nylander as an add on would nice for the brothers. Maybe build up some family chemistry.

Yes, it is a bit of a stretch. However, I would argue that neither Kapanen or Mikheyev are neither worth a 1st. Maybe a 2nd, definitely 3rds. They are very good, talented players though. Lehner being the back up to Andersen is the big sell on this though. Taking Ceci's contract is sweetener.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 1:56 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Fleury can't be considered an A prospect at this point if he ever could've been.


I'd argue that Carolina isn't giving Fleury his fair chance. He's a great skater for a dman who's 6'3''. He's got very good two way potential as well. Maybe just my opinion, but I am an admirer.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 1:58 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: math731
0 chance MTL trade Suzuki... Especially for an overpaid and old C. We're set at C (especially with Zuke). That trade is laughable


Fair enough, Toews is a tough trade to gauge, thanks for the input. How are you guys feeling about Kotkaniemi? Just curious how Habs fans are feeling about him.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 2:34 p.m.
#13
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,654
Likes: 12,372
Quoting: HatterTParty
No problem.

Okay, so, with Kapanen, a lot of the cap space movement issues I've heard regarding the leafs involves moving either Johnsson or Kapanen to free up room. Moving Ceci makes sense in my mind only cuz that's more cap space and no one in Toronto seems to like him. As for Mikheyev, yea its a bit of a stretch. Great contract, good numbers, good size and even better speed. I like him a lot!!!

In return, I figured having Lehner would make him a dependable back up that Andersen can depend on to get some rest. Nylander as an add on would nice for the brothers. Maybe build up some family chemistry.

Yes, it is a bit of a stretch. However, I would argue that neither Kapanen or Mikheyev are neither worth a 1st. Maybe a 2nd, definitely 3rds. They are very good, talented players though. Lehner being the back up to Andersen is the big sell on this though. Taking Ceci's contract is sweetener.


You're seriously undervaluing what Kapanen is worth, like who's trading a young winger on pace for 40 points who's signed for 3.2M for two more seasons after this one AND is still an RFA once this contract ends for only a 3rd? He's easily worth a 2nd+ at the very least if not a mid to late 1st to some teams.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 2:37 p.m.
#14
Zuke is the goat
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 1,571
Quoting: HatterTParty
Fair enough, Toews is a tough trade to gauge, thanks for the input. How are you guys feeling about Kotkaniemi? Just curious how Habs fans are feeling about him.


Hes great. I dont think theres any reason to trade him. Fans telling hes a bust just think that a 19 yo must put 60pts to not be considered a bust
Dec. 27, 2019 at 2:42 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Montreal rejects. We wouldn't trade Suzuki for Toews straight up.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 3:01 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
You're seriously undervaluing what Kapanen is worth, like who's trading a young winger on pace for 40 points who's signed for 3.2M for two more seasons after this one AND is still an RFA once this contract ends for only a 3rd? He's easily worth a 2nd+ at the very least if not a mid to late 1st to some teams.


You’re right! Completely! Great contract with production to boot. However, remember, Toronto trading him would be from a position of need, not really strength. What I mean is that if you did move him, it’s because you need the cap space. Sure teams will pay a first, but it’ll be rare when they realize cap desperation is involved. Also, and yes this may be me, but lehner is a top 10 easily goalie in this league. That’s your first rounder comparable.

Believe me, though, I get where you’re coming from though and you are right. But we all know trades and trade value is not black and white in this league.
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 3:07 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: HabsForEver
Montreal rejects. We wouldn't trade Suzuki for Toews straight up.


Quoting: math731
Hes great. I dont think theres any reason to trade him. Fans telling hes a bust just think that a 19 yo must put 60pts to not be considered a bust


Thank you for saying that!!! Everyone kept giving me **** when I said that Suzuki is a fantastic player before the season started.

I feel like the only head scratching thing about KK is simply this: didn’t you guys have danault, domi, and Suzuki before drafting KK? I know in Suzuki’s case he was still a prospect, but the other two were both established. Believe me I’m sure I’m wrong, I definitely didn’t look that up before I made this point. But I do remember them saying when you drafted KK, you went for a position of need. Now you guys are stacked at center!
Dec. 27, 2019 at 3:14 p.m.
#18
Zuke is the goat
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 1,571
Quoting: HatterTParty
Thank you for saying that!!! Everyone kept giving me **** when I said that Suzuki is a fantastic player before the season started.

I feel like the only head scratching thing about KK is simply this: didn’t you guys have danault, domi, and Suzuki before drafting KK? I know in Suzuki’s case he was still a prospect, but the other two were both established. Believe me I’m sure I’m wrong, I definitely didn’t look that up before I made this point. But I do remember them saying when you drafted KK, you went for a position of need. Now you guys are stacked at center!


I think our C line of the futur is KK, Zuke and Danault with Domi on the W
Dec. 27, 2019 at 3:42 p.m.
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: HatterTParty
No problem.

Okay, so, with Kapanen, a lot of the cap space movement issues I've heard regarding the leafs involves moving either Johnsson or Kapanen to free up room. Moving Ceci makes sense in my mind only cuz that's more cap space and no one in Toronto seems to like him. As for Mikheyev, yea its a bit of a stretch. Great contract, good numbers, good size and even better speed. I like him a lot!!!

In return, I figured having Lehner would make him a dependable back up that Andersen can depend on to get some rest. Nylander as an add on would nice for the brothers. Maybe build up some family chemistry.

Yes, it is a bit of a stretch. However, I would argue that neither Kapanen or Mikheyev are neither worth a 1st. Maybe a 2nd, definitely 3rds. They are very good, talented players though. Lehner being the back up to Andersen is the big sell on this though. Taking Ceci's contract is sweetener.


So the rookie with the most points in the league and a former 1st who is succeeding at the nhl level, both put up points, kill penalties and have overall great 200ft games aren’t worth firsts?

I’m sure I could win that argument....

Lehner is a bit overkill for a backup and I wouldn’t give more than a 2nd for nylander. That gives you two top 6 forwards for a rental on lehner.
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 5:44 p.m.
#20
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,654
Likes: 12,372
Quoting: HatterTParty
You’re right! Completely! Great contract with production to boot. However, remember, Toronto trading him would be from a position of need, not really strength. What I mean is that if you did move him, it’s because you need the cap space. Sure teams will pay a first, but it’ll be rare when they realize cap desperation is involved. Also, and yes this may be me, but lehner is a top 10 easily goalie in this league. That’s your first rounder comparable.

Believe me, though, I get where you’re coming from though and you are right. But we all know trades and trade value is not black and white in this league.


I get it but I think it's really a fact of overvaluing a 1st to some degree, how long before a mid to late round 1st round pick amounts to what Kapanen is now? Likely years and with where Toronto is in their window they'd be foolish to trade him for a rental goalie albeit a very good one.

Even if I concede Kapanen for Lehner is arguably fair, (but it's not, it's an overpay) and if Toronto really wanted Lehner they'd be better off trading a 1st for him but if they did trade Kapanen for Lehner trading Mikheyev, Ceci and a 2nd is WAY too much for Nylander, if it was Murphy instead of Nylander maybe I could see it but as you have this trade here I think it's just a mess that doesn't work for the Leafs at all.

I'm not a Leafs fan and I get this site is just for fun and most are homer ACGMs but this trade only considers one teams needs really, I get that they attain cap space but it still creates other holes in their lineup that need to be filled by trading out Ceci a RHD and two top 9 wingers, it just makes no sense.
Dec. 27, 2019 at 8:54 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: HatterTParty
Whoa whoa, okay, first of all, we’re getting fleury and bean from Carolina, both are A prospects, if you wanna switch out one, go for it. A first and a third is more than fair, but I’d say the two firsts plus the two players would scare Carolina away. Sooooo, I chose the two top notch defenders WE NEED and a first as opposed to two first round picks we may **** up.


Fluery is 23 years old, a 2014 #7 picks overall and hasn't been able to stay in the lineup, not exactly a star or living up to a #7 pick and definitely not an A prospect prospect anymore.

For Bean it's hard to say what he is worth; was 13th OA pick in 2016 I believe.

Either way, those two and first round pick doesn't cut it. (2) 1sts and Suzuki and Hawks are at least going to get a discussion going. Either way there's not a chance Kane waves for Carolina so pointless discussion.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll