Quoting: Trickster
More then being speculated.
It is just the way it is.
I want the hammer dropped on the players too.
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Here are two simple adjustments:
1. Baseball is, more than any other major sport, statistics-intensive. Therefore, any batting statistic for a Houston player relating to the third, fourth and fifth game of the World Series should have an asterisk attached to it.
2. Houston gets no home games for the next two post-seasons; let them play on a neutral field of a non-playoff team (or teams, could rotate) so that those fans could get to see post-season games.
Okay, but if it means that players wouldn't come forward in the future would you still want them punished?
Also, a question for both of you and
@oneX what do you guys think of banning the Astros from postseason play? Hear me out on this one, by banning them from the playoffs all incentive to cheat would be gone IMO. The players want to win so they would be deterred managers and coaching staff are already deterred from cheating after the 1-year bans handed out and gm's wouldn't want to cheat either for the same reasons. Also, if a player is set to hit FA the acquiring team would not have their services for the postseason until the ban is over. If a player is arb eligible they could lose those rights as well, IMO, that would get rid of cheating in the game.
In this case, you could band them for either 1,2 or 3 years and the penalties only become more severe each time a team gets caught. You may not like it but I think it would be effective.... I mean, would you cheat if that was the punishment? And it punishes the players like you guys want. I'm guessing I'll get a thumbs down on this one, oh well just an idea.