SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Changing of the Gaurd

Created by: The_Gaudfather
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 17, 2020
Published: Aug. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm not entirely sure all these things could go through as they are, but this does provide something of a skeleton, and is likely close.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,750,000
4$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,000,000
2$1,250,000
1$2,000,000
2$3,000,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [RFA Rights]
FLA
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (CGY)
3.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$71,531,666$0$457,500$9,968,334

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$780,000$780,000
C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 17, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 494
Likes: 131
NJ says no.
cgy_flame_fan liked this.
Aug. 17, 2020 at 7:20 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 374
Likes: 168
Emphatic no* ^
Aug. 17, 2020 at 7:28 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
NJD trade- More to the Devils
FLA trade- seems even (I guess)
CBJ trade- Columbus adds, but they don’t really want to as Bjorkstrand has turned into a top line wing they need. He’s one of the few Columbus players who seems to carry the play.
Aug. 17, 2020 at 7:47 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 54
Likes: 17
Quoting: Ajp_18
NJD trade- More to the Devils
FLA trade- seems even (I guess)
CBJ trade- Columbus adds, but they don’t really want to as Bjorkstrand has turned into a top line wing they need. He’s one of the few Columbus players who seems to carry the play.


I think the Flames would be alright with Bjorkstrand coming back, explicitly because he is important to Columbus. Maybe there could be pick quibbling or Josh Anderson gets put in, but if Columbus accepted that, I think Calgary would be satisfied.

On the Hischier trade: what if Calgary included Bennett, and two of Pelletier, Emillio-Pettersen, conditional 1st round pick?
Aug. 17, 2020 at 7:51 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 54
Likes: 17
Quoting: Ajp_18
NJD trade- More to the Devils
FLA trade- seems even (I guess)
CBJ trade- Columbus adds, but they don’t really want to as Bjorkstrand has turned into a top line wing they need. He’s one of the few Columbus players who seems to carry the play.


Is Hischier a no-go? What would Calgary need to further include for this to be feasible?
Aug. 17, 2020 at 8:06 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 614
Weegar will command way more than a 2nd
Aug. 17, 2020 at 8:11 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: The_Gaudfather
I think the Flames would be alright with Bjorkstrand coming back, explicitly because he is important to Columbus. Maybe there could be pick quibbling or Josh Anderson gets put in, but if Columbus accepted that, I think Calgary would be satisfied.

On the Hischier trade: what if Calgary included Bennett, and two of Pelletier, Emillio-Pettersen, conditional 1st round pick?


Quoting: The_Gaudfather
Is Hischier a no-go? What would Calgary need to further include for this to be feasible?


If I’m Columbus I’m not trading Bjorkstrand right now. Not sure if Anderson and a 1st round get Monahan though. Bjorkstrnd is basically untouchable.

Nico would have to likely be a pretty big overpayment.

IMO Calgary shouldn’t be morning their core players. Keep Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk and add a younger number 1 D and go get someone like Raanta to be the number one.

What would you think of a trade around Merzlinkins andAnderson for Lindholm and Parson or Gillies (which ever one you don’t want). That would help fill the goalie hole for CGY and replaces Lindholm on the wing. Columbus gets a guy who could be a 2nd line center.
Aug. 17, 2020 at 8:14 p.m.
#8
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,938
Likes: 26,436
Devils decline
Aug. 17, 2020 at 8:15 p.m.
#9
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,544
Likes: 2,066
Quoting: Ajp_18

IMO Calgary shouldn’t be morning their core players. Keep Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk and add a younger number 1 D and go get someone like Raanta to be the number one.



I would say that unless the Flames reach the conference finals, something big will happen in Calgary. There's been smoke all season regarding a significant trade, if they fail to make a run yet again, things will change. This core has remained relatively untouched since 2015 and by and large, they've underwhelmed.
Ajp_18 liked this.
Aug. 17, 2020 at 8:35 p.m.
#10
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,933
Likes: 8,572
@keep_ups12 told me to ping him somewhere for some reason
Aug. 17, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 54
Likes: 17
Quoting: Ajp_18
If I’m Columbus I’m not trading Bjorkstrand right now. Not sure if Anderson and a 1st round get Monahan though. Bjorkstrnd is basically untouchable.

Nico would have to likely be a pretty big overpayment.

IMO Calgary shouldn’t be morning their core players. Keep Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk and add a younger number 1 D and go get someone like Raanta to be the number one.

What would you think of a trade around Merzlinkins andAnderson for Lindholm and Parson or Gillies (which ever one you don’t want). That would help fill the goalie hole for CGY and replaces Lindholm on the wing. Columbus gets a guy who could be a 2nd line center.


I actually did think about Monahan to ARI for Garland, Raanta, and a 1st, but I felt like that wasn't a big enough return. Just with how volatile the goal-tending position can be, it doesn't make sense for Calgary to trade such a big asset for a goaltender. Further, I feel Monahan is overrated, and that Calgary would be smart to move him for a player that actually moves the needle. Gaudreau is the driver on their line so I move him reluctantly, and would prefer to keep him. Gaudreau is on a really good contract with some term left, and could really be a boon for a team looking to contend. If he is traded, his contract has to be recognized as a component of his value. Unfortunately, I feel that a Gaudreau trade is almost inevitable at this point, but should only be done for a high-end young-player.

At least for now, Talbot and Rittich are good enough and I would hesitate to move Lindholm for a goalie. I'm not really high on Josh Anderson either. Though I like Merzilkins a lot, I'm not sure I would offer much more than Sam Bennett and a 2020 3rd.

Provided Calgary cannot get Hischer out of NJ, Anthony Cirelli should be top of the list. Lindholm would not only be valuable to TB, but also versatile, especially considering their cap crunch. Though moving other pieces out would be preferable, they likely have to make a choice between Sergachev and Cirelli.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll