SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston Trade Fixed

Created by: ForsbergForVezina
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 2, 2020
Published: Sep. 2, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I saw the Boston trade on a Bruins ACGM yesterday and actually really liked it. I'm really high on Kase, which is maybe blinding me a bit, but he's a really solid two-way player. The original post included John Moore for the Hawks to take, which I didn't hate, but he's a replacement level defenseman and for three more years at $2.75 MM, that's not the best investment. If Boston was completely hung up on us taking him, I still think I'd do it, but for now, I'm just going with the retention, which is basically the same as it would cost if we took Moore back.

As for the lineup, most of the improve is going to have to come internally. Dach, Nylander and Suter will have to keep getting better and DeBrincat and Strome both need to bounce back after relative poor seasons. Kase will be a nice boost, hopefully in time he can replace Saad's impact and I think he will. Defense is still a question mark, but hopefully Mitchell will be as good as advertised and Boqvist will take some steps forward in his development. A full season from CDH would also be a nice added bonus (fingers crossed). My hope is that Beaudin or Carlsson can come up as well at some point but seeing how well Koekkoek played this year, I think he gets the call first unless one of those two guys blows everyone away at camp.

If those steps forward are taken and we get another good year out of Crow, I think we've got a good shot at getting back to the playoffs and maybe making some more noise this time
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
6$5,750,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,500,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Strand, Austin [RFA Rights]
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (LAK)
LAK
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. 2021 5th round pick (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. 2020 4th round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Caggiula, Drake [RFA Rights]
3.
CHI
  1. Kase, Ondrej
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Saad, Brandon ($1,675,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,194,539$1,090,244$5,900,000$8,305,461
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low
bhavikp27 liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: shmoeman
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low


Saad is a pretty big upgrade to Kase and that's no knock on Kase but more a testament to a very good player in Saad. Hawks should pass, Kase is not who they need on the first line.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,478
Likes: 18,452
I used to say the criticism of Kase being fragile/soft were overblown...I'm not so sure now.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
No thanks. And not sure why people think Bruins will trade Kase. He's looked good; just matter of time before he produces. Even though Saad is better right now, he makes $3.4M more (BOS have several free agents) and only has one year left.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,684
Likes: 9,837
I don't think it makes sense to trade Saad during the offseason. He'll garner at least a late 1st @ the TDL next year if the Hawks are out of it. If they're still in it....the Hawks will want Saad.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:51 p.m.
#6
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,642
Likes: 8,285
Yeah i think saad is a pretty decent upgrade at the moment but hes only signed one more year and I think they're hoping kase is a longer term fix on that rw. Value seems ok.
ForsbergForVezina liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 12:57 p.m.
#7
MMBzFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 281
Sweeney needs his draft picks now. Already gave up a 1st to get rid of Backes. I’m ok with the trade of Kase but I would offer a prospect instead of a 2nd or the 2nd turns into a 3rd if Saad doesn’t re-sign in Boston.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:12 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: shmoeman
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low


Quoting: bhavikp27
No thanks. And not sure why people think Bruins will trade Kase. He's looked good; just matter of time before he produces. Even though Saad is better right now, he makes $3.4M more (BOS have several free agents) and only has one year left.


The speculation on here confused me a bit too, especially given everything they gave up to get him. But if it made sense, I wanted to see what it might cost to get him. Like I said, I'm a big fan and I think he'll be a key piece for the Bruins moving forward if they keep him
bhavikp27 liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:20 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
The speculation on here confused me a bit too, especially given everything they gave up to get him. But if it made sense, I wanted to see what it might cost to get him. Like I said, I'm a big fan and I think he'll be a key piece for the Bruins moving forward if they keep him


Yea i agree. Also think Saad with retention would be a really solid fit on the Bruins, could be a deadline deal if Kase continues to struggle but I think they end up keeping him for at least another half a year
ForsbergForVezina liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:35 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: ChiHawk
Saad is a pretty big upgrade to Kase and that's no knock on Kase but more a testament to a very good player in Saad. Hawks should pass, Kase is not who they need on the first line.


Quoting: exo2769
I don't think it makes sense to trade Saad during the offseason. He'll garner at least a late 1st @ the TDL next year if the Hawks are out of it. If they're still in it....the Hawks will want Saad.


I'd say Saad is probably a bit better offensively, but Kase is much better at limiting the opposition shots and chances. I think the Hawks need that right now more than anything. Maybe it's just a structure thing and readjusting Saad's role would get him back to being a better defensive player; he has the tools to be better. But I'm not sure re-signing Saad is the best plan for this team and I don't think an offer like this (an offer I'd value higher that a late 1st straight up) would be available at the trade deadline. If this came around this offseason, I'd take it
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:38 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: MMBzFan
Sweeney needs his draft picks now. Already gave up a 1st to get rid of Backes. I’m ok with the trade of Kase but I would offer a prospect instead of a 2nd or the 2nd turns into a 3rd if Saad doesn’t re-sign in Boston.


Works for me too. I'll always take a prospect who looks promising their development over a pick that may or may not turn into a player. Unfortunately I think that the "this pick upgrades if a player re-signs" thing was outlawed by the newest CBA, which sucks because I think that would work well here
MMBzFan liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
I'd say Saad is probably a bit better offensively, but Kase is much better at limiting the opposition shots and chances. I think the Hawks need that right now more than anything. Maybe it's just a structure thing and readjusting Saad's role would get him back to being a better defensive player; he has the tools to be better. But I'm not sure re-signing Saad is the best plan for this team and I don't think an offer like this (an offer I'd value higher that a late 1st straight up) would be available at the trade deadline. If this came around this offseason, I'd take it


Saad is one of the better two way wingers in the game, definitely top 20, and known as a good defensive player and stronger on the puck. Saad had more blocks and they were even in takeaways with Saad less giveaways. Kase isn't bad, but Saad is simply a better winger hands down. He'll also likely sign a new deal for $4.5M for 5 is my guess.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 52
Likes: 10
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I used to say the criticism of Kase being fragile/soft were overblown...I'm not so sure now.


Based on what? He's not fragile and he's no more or less soft than the bulk of the roster. Pasta and Krejci are the same level of physical as Kase.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 1:52 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,478
Likes: 18,452
Quoting: mattyb929
Based on what? He's not fragile and he's no more or less soft than the bulk of the roster. Pasta and Krejci are the same level of physical as Kase.


Based on what I saw in playoffs... skating circles around scrums, waiting for the puck to spit out, instead of going in and getting it himself.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 2:28 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 666
Oh man I'd love this trade if were moving on from saad, really high on kase even if he hasnt looked amazing in boston.
ForsbergForVezina liked this.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 3:28 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: newman23
Oh man I'd love this trade if were moving on from saad, really high on kase even if he hasnt looked amazing in boston.


My thoughts exactly
Sep. 2, 2020 at 3:45 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,663
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: ChiHawk
Saad is one of the better two way wingers in the game, definitely top 20, and known as a good defensive player and stronger on the puck. Saad had more blocks and they were even in takeaways with Saad less giveaways. Kase isn't bad, but Saad is simply a better winger hands down. He'll also likely sign a new deal for $4.5M for 5 is my guess.


I think he's solid as well, but defensively I honestly think Kase is better. His relative Corsi and expected goals against numbers over the last three seasons are much better than Saad's, his rates of takeaways and blocks per 60 minutes are actually noticeably higher than Saad's are and Kase's has over seven more expected defensive goals above replacement than Saad does, again over the last three seasons. I don't know how much of that can be attributed to the bad team around Saad and how much is on him, but most metrics point to Kase being superior for the time being. I've never watched a lot of Kase, so I can't say with certainty if he's better defensively or not, but the numbers definitely point to it being the case.

Saad is definitely better offensively -- he is really strong on the puck and creates a lot of high quality scoring opportunities. Kase does much the same actually, but not on the same level. I also think Saad has a higher ceiling offensively and maybe even defensively too. It's just been awhile since he's actually hit that ceiling.
Sep. 2, 2020 at 4:09 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
I think he's solid as well, but defensively I honestly think Kase is better. His relative Corsi and expected goals against numbers over the last three seasons are much better than Saad's, his rates of takeaways and blocks per 60 minutes are actually noticeably higher than Saad's are and Kase's has over seven more expected defensive goals above replacement than Saad does, again over the last three seasons. I don't know how much of that can be attributed to the bad team around Saad and how much is on him, but most metrics point to Kase being superior for the time being. I've never watched a lot of Kase, so I can't say with certainty if he's better defensively or not, but the numbers definitely point to it being the case.

Saad is definitely better offensively -- he is really strong on the puck and creates a lot of high quality scoring opportunities. Kase does much the same actually, but not on the same level. I also think Saad has a higher ceiling offensively and maybe even defensively too. It's just been awhile since he's actually hit that ceiling.


I think you would have to watch Kase and yes, a lot of the metrics your are pointing to are a result of playing on a better defensive team. Also, not sure where you are getting that it's been awhile since saad has hit that ceiling; he had a far superior takeaway to giveaway ratio and matching some of his best years. He was on pace for 30 goals had it not been for the stoppage of the season; his best was 31 goals in his career.

Kase is just not a 1st liner that will drive play and possession. Comparing one to the other, which I'd argue is a fool's errand, Saad is simply a better player hands down. Adding Kase would be nice, but in a middle 6 role, not a first line role and as such, would leaving a huge hole on the first line that Saad fills nicely.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll