SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Danault 2021-22

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 8, 2020
Published: Sep. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
7$9,000,000
2$2,000,000
2$900,000
2$1,800,000
4$3,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,500,000
5$5,000,000
6$5,500,000
2$1,500,000
2$1,000,000
Trades
1.
COL
    Danault extended at $5.5m x 6 - trade in 2020 offseason.
    MTL
    1. Beaucage, Alex [Reserve List]
    2. Graves, Ryan [RFA Rights]
    3. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
    2.
    COL
      Seattle

      Expansion Draft Protection (7+3+1):

      - Mackinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Danault, Burakovsky, Nichuskin
      - Makar, Girard, Johnson (NMC)
      - Grubauer

      Exposed:
      - Compher, Donskoi, O'Connor, Zadorov, Francouz
      3.
      COL
      1. 2021 2nd round pick (FLA)
      Additional Details:
      To whoever for futures.
      4.
      COL
      1. 2020 2nd round pick (BUF)
      Additional Details:
      For pick(s) from whoever.
      BUF
      1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2020
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the FLA
      Logo of the COL
      2021
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the FLA
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      2022
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      Logo of the COL
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$81,500,000$82,098,963$1,741,463$3,125,000-$598,963

      Roster

      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $925,000$925,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $6,300,000$6,300,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $9,250,000$9,250,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $7,500,000$7,500,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 8
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
      RW
      RFA - 2
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $900,000$900,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $750,000$750,000
      RW
      RFA
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
      LD/RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      RD
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      G
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      RD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $3,750,000$3,750,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
      $1,800,000$1,800,000
      RD
      RFA - 2
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 8:52 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 6,287
      Likes: 3,035
      If Danault isnt happy playing a reduced role in Montreal, why is happy and re-signing doing it in Colorado?
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 8:54 p.m.
      #2
      Am Yisrael Chai
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2018
      Posts: 18,598
      Likes: 6,727
      Donskoi and Zadorov to Buffalo for 2021 2nd and 3rd
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 8:57 p.m.
      #3
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
      Donskoi and Zadorov to Buffalo for 2021 2nd and 3rd


      Zadorov could get that on his own sans Donskoi. We need to keep one of Zadorov/Graves though.
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 8:58 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Edited Sep. 8, 2020 at 9:13 p.m.
      Quoting: Byrr
      If Danault isnt happy playing a reduced role in Montreal, why is happy and re-signing doing it in Colorado?


      Because in Colorado he'd be playing on a top contender that plays offensive hockey. By extending him immediately he wouldn't have to worry about putting up points in a contract year either.

      He'd also get competent linemates to play with instead of the likes of Byron/Weal/etc.
      Blazingbat11 liked this.
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 10:24 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 11,389
      Likes: 9,030
      That effectively blocks Newhook. Sure it’d be nice to run Dannault as the 3C but the Avs I believe are very eager to get Newhook and Byram into the NHL, and Newhook is a C they shouldn’t mess around playing him on the wing, BC tried it and the results were meh, they moved him back to C and they were wow.
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 11:10 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2018
      Posts: 15,495
      Likes: 6,436
      So let me get this straight! Danault who is arguably one of the top 10 2 way centers in the league is only worth a Grave + Beaucage + 1st after playing in the NHL for 7 years and is able to shut down the top players in the league on a nightly basis. Where as a guy who has never even played an NHL game is somehow worth more! Rediculous that Avs fans seem to think Byram is worth more than Drouin + Struble + Poehling + 2020 1st round pick (MTL) + 2021 2nd round pick (MTL) + 2021 3rd round pick (MTL). That is like saying Norlinder is worth Burakovski + Timmins + Beaucage + 1st + 2nd + 3rd.

      So if a guy like Byram who has yet to play in the NHL is worth that much I guess Suzuki is worth McKinnon + Rantanen + Girard + Timmins + 2020 1st + 2021 1st + 2022 1st!
      Sep. 8, 2020 at 11:15 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2016
      Posts: 2,012
      Likes: 556
      Quoting: Richard88
      Because in Colorado he'd be playing on a top contender that plays offensive hockey. By extending him immediately he wouldn't have to worry about putting up points in a contract year either.

      He'd also get competent linemates to play with instead of the likes of Byron/Weal/etc.


      Danault has played with Tatar and Gallagher for the past few years. If Montreal is looking to upgrade their wingers, he may continue playing with Tatar and/or Gallagher. Although I agree, if he wants a Cup right now, I could see him signing a 2-3 year extension.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 5:50 a.m.
      #8
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      That effectively blocks Newhook. Sure it’d be nice to run Dannault as the 3C but the Avs I believe are very eager to get Newhook and Byram into the NHL, and Newhook is a C they shouldn’t mess around playing him on the wing, BC tried it and the results were meh, they moved him back to C and they were wow.

      I disagree, I don't think it blocks Newhook. He can start on the wing for 1 season and then take over Kadri's spot at C in 2022.

      Newhook is obviously going to be a C long-term, but I think we can afford to have him on the wing for a year. We need to be going for a cup.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 5:53 a.m.
      #9
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: RobbStark03
      Danault has played with Tatar and Gallagher for the past few years. If Montreal is looking to upgrade their wingers, he may continue playing with Tatar and/or Gallagher. Although I agree, if he wants a Cup right now, I could see him signing a 2-3 year extension.

      I doubt he signs for only 2-3 years. Players always tend to look for long-term security if they can get it.

      Montreal split up Tatar-Gallaher and Danault in the playoffs and that might be a sign of things to come.

      If we acquired Danault I think we could recrete that Tatar-Danault-Gallagher line somewhat with a line of Landeskog-Danault-Kaut... Landeskog is the physical guy (Gallagher), and Kaut would be the more cerebral finisher, like Tatar.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 9:12 a.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 11,389
      Likes: 9,030
      Quoting: Richard88
      I disagree, I don't think it blocks Newhook. He can start on the wing for 1 season and then take over Kadri's spot at C in 2022.

      Newhook is obviously going to be a C long-term, but I think we can afford to have him on the wing for a year. We need to be going for a cup.


      Did you see him play wing at BC? So the plan is to not play him at C then drop him in at 2C? I know you’re being creative and I like it, but if you do that you might as well trade Newhook and roll What you have above. But answer me this, if the Avs has Dannault against Dallas do you think the results would have been different?
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 9:40 a.m.
      #11
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      Did you see him play wing at BC? So the plan is to not play him at C then drop him in at 2C? I know you’re being creative and I like it, but if you do that you might as well trade Newhook and roll What you have above. But answer me this, if the Avs has Dannault against Dallas do you think the results would have been different?


      It's not ideal to have Newhook on the wing. Maybe the solution is to roll with Mackinnon-Kadri-Danault down the middle in 20-21, and then trade Kadri in 2021 with 1 year to UFA and roll with Mackinnon-Danault-Newhook.

      If we had Danault against Dallas our 3rd line would have showed up a lot more and been a force. We would have been better on key faceoffs, and also on the PK. I'd be inclined to think that we would have been better off against Dallas with him. But obviously you can't legislate for goalie meltdowns so perhaps it would have made no difference.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 9:53 a.m.
      #12
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 11,389
      Likes: 9,030
      Quoting: Richard88
      It's not ideal to have Newhook on the wing. Maybe the solution is to roll with Mackinnon-Kadri-Danault down the middle in 20-21, and then trade Kadri in 2021 with 1 year to UFA and roll with Mackinnon-Danault-Newhook.

      If we had Danault against Dallas our 3rd line would have showed up a lot more and been a force. We would have been better on key faceoffs, and also on the PK. I'd be inclined to think that we would have been better off against Dallas with him. But obviously you can't legislate for goalie meltdowns so perhaps it would have made no difference.


      I disagree wholeheartedly. He wouldn’t have improved the PK because it is fundamentally flawed at the plan phase, how would he have prevented all the cross and diagonal passes that lead to back door goals? The 3rd line accounted for 2 of the 4 goals scored in game 7. The bottom 6 wasn’t the problem in the series you know that
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 9:59 a.m.
      #13
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      I disagree wholeheartedly. He wouldn’t have improved the PK because it is fundamentally flawed at the plan phase, how would he have prevented all the cross and diagonal passes that lead to back door goals? The 3rd line accounted for 2 of the 4 goals scored in game 7. The bottom 6 wasn’t the problem in the series you know that


      The 3rd line was relegated to being our 4th line for most of this series. With a better 3rd line we would have dominated them even more.

      But yeah maybe it wouldn't have made a huge difference to the PK or goaltending obviously.

      That said, Danault on this team going forwards elevates us to Tampa's level imo.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 10:17 a.m.
      #14
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 11,389
      Likes: 9,030
      Quoting: Richard88
      The 3rd line was relegated to being our 4th line for most of this series. With a better 3rd line we would have dominated them even more.

      But yeah maybe it wouldn't have made a huge difference to the PK or goaltending obviously.

      That said, Danault on this team going forwards elevates us to Tampa's level imo.


      We are at Tampa’s level minus goal tending and PK. The Avs are a dominant 5v5 team. If they had even below average PK and goal tending they destroy Dallas. I mean c’mon in the 4 loses the highest save percentage was .854 and they had a chance to win 3 of those games. I think at on pt the PK was not exaggerating like 60% for the series, that is 100% on coaching.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 11:23 a.m.
      #15
      Thread Starter
      John 3 16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2020
      Posts: 9,581
      Likes: 4,618
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      We are at Tampa’s level minus goal tending and PK. The Avs are a dominant 5v5 team. If they had even below average PK and goal tending they destroy Dallas. I mean c’mon in the 4 loses the highest save percentage was .854 and they had a chance to win 3 of those games. I think at on pt the PK was not exaggerating like 60% for the series, that is 100% on coaching.


      With a healthy lineup Tampa have Stamkos - Point - Cirelli - Gourde down the middle.

      We'd need a competent 3C to get to that level.
      Sep. 9, 2020 at 12:36 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 11,389
      Likes: 9,030
      Quoting: Richard88
      With a healthy lineup Tampa have Stamkos - Point - Cirelli - Gourde down the middle.

      We'd need a competent 3C to get to that level.


      Yeah Stamkos doesn’t play center anymore, or should I say very rarely. Love him hate him, Compher is every bit the Gourde is minus his ridiculous contract. And I’ve said it and I’ll stand by it, if you are investing heavy capital in your bottom 6 you are doing it wrong.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll