SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel to Rangers Idea

Created by: hockey101
Team: 2020-21 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 28, 2020
Published: Sep. 28, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
As per Bob McKenzie, Eichel may be on the trading block. The Sabres will not be competitive for another few years. They have a lot of depth to fill. Eichel may be asking to be traded, and if not the Sabres know it would be a matter of time until that happens.

The Rangers need a center, although not Eichel, necessarily. Yet, McKenzie mentioned the Rangers have interest. Having Zibanejad and Eichel would make one of the nastiest two center duo in the NHL, amplifying wingers' production.

Trading Staal was a shrewd and unexpected move, and could have been done for this reason; a starting point to making room for Eichel.

The Sabres need a goaltender, and they need depth. They acquire Georgiev, Strome, Chytil, and Smith as mostly a salary trade off. Plus, the 22nd overall pick. The package could be improved, and a couple of more pieces could be added. But, the main pieces are Georgiev, Strome, and Chytil.

The Rangers will find themselves in a tough situation as they will depend on inexpensive youth, and depth fillers via free agency. Lazar is a cheap, but useful addition. McCabe adds leadership, and depth to the blueline.

Rangers then trade DeAngelo to Winnipeg for Roslovic, another young, but experienced, NHLer with a low salary.

DeAngelo would work in the Eichel trade only if the Sabres manage to move Ristolainen first.

So, I'm open to ideas here. Thank you!
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
2$1,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3$925,000
Trades
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Roslovic, Jack [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Deangelo, Anthony [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
2021
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$69,718,967$0$7,162,500$11,781,033
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 2
Lafreniere, Alexis
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$730,000$730,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 28, 2020 at 10:53 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Probably going to get blasted fairly hard but I don’t think that’s actually too bad. A tweek or two but foundation is certainly there
hockey101 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 10:56 p.m.
#2
Habs_fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 677
Likes: 159
Any trade for Eichel to the Rangers will have to include the 1st overall pick. Otherwise Buffalo won't listen.
OlegP liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 10:56 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Hockey101
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 33
Quoting: Timmah007
Probably going to get blasted fairly hard but I don’t think that’s actually too bad. A tweek or two but foundation is certainly there


Haha, yeah. But they will be the same people that would have shot down anyone's idea of NYR trading Staal for anything, and yet it happened. I got blasted for Matheson trades with the "no way he goes anywhere". Many times, big name players with big contracts do not yield a great return.

It could be better structured, but the idea is fairly realistic, I think.

Thanks for the kind reply!
Sep. 28, 2020 at 10:56 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 369
Come on dude, this is just annoying

Zib for Skinner is the counter offer
Riley816 and Shibbal18 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:02 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hockey101
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 33
Quoting: p1015983
Any trade for Eichel to the Rangers will have to include the 1st overall pick. Otherwise Buffalo won't listen.


And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:03 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
Come on dude, this is just annoying

Zib for Skinner is the counter offer


That would make Eichel happy. Rangers get to keep Strome and Smith. Maybe the Sabres take Buchnevich to even out the money???
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:05 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


Getting Strome and Smith helps them???
sabres89 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:06 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 369
Quoting: Riley816
That would make Eichel happy. Rangers get to keep Strome and Smith. Maybe the Sabres take Buchnevich to even out the money???


Dude I am so tired of obnoxious Rangers trade proposals. Like They are making these proposals for Barkov, Eichel, Matthews, Seguin, Point, Stamkos and giving up the same bad package of Buch, Strome, Car 1st, Smith, and Georgiev
Shibbal18, Sabres728924, sabres89 and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:10 p.m.
#9
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,651
Likes: 6,757
Eichel ain't going nowhere.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:10 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Hockey101
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 33
Quoting: Riley816
Getting Strome and Smith helps them???


And Chytil, and Georgiev. And like I said, probably more pieces would need to be added.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:12 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Hockey101
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 33
Quoting: Brian1590
Did you actually read the whole thread or you dumb and can’t read more than the two words you want to. McKenzie also said that Jack has not asked for a trade and that even though the Sabres took calls it was basically teams asking if they’d be interested in trading Eichel and Adams quickly turning them down. Also NYR don’t have the pieces to get Eichel.


Someone screenshot that tweet to me and that's all I saw. Kind of obvious though that Eichel is not happy in Buffalo. Next time, don't be such a jack ass.
OlegP liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:14 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
Dude I am so tired of obnoxious Rangers trade proposals. Like They are making these proposals for Barkov, Eichel, Matthews, Seguin, Point, Stamkos and giving up the same bad package of Buch, Strome, Car 1st, Smith, and Georgiev


I believe I'm agreeing with you...
Breadmanhawks liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 369
Quoting: Riley816
I believe I'm agreeing with you...


No I know. Sorry my bad haha. I was venting lol. Just exhausted after seeing these proposals todat
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:16 p.m.
#14
Stripes77
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 319
Likes: 169
Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


Buffalo trading Eichel would mean they are giving up and rebuilding completely...it would cost 1st overall and then some. The Sabres might be losing a ton of depth but they certainly aren't losing quality depth, the reason the Sabres have been so bad is nobody outside of 4 players one of which is Eichel is any good...trading Eichel for depth is a joke
sabres89 and OlegP liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:18 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 134
Likes: 80
Quoting: hockey101
Someone screenshot that tweet to me and that's all I saw. Kind of obvious though that Eichel is not happy in Buffalo. Next time, don't be such a jack ass.

Then look up the entire quote you dumb ass. You have the internet it’s not that hard. Also it’s not kind of obvious that he’s not happy with being in Buffal, he’s not happy with losing. Which no one here is. We have a new GM who seems like he at least sounds like he knows what he’s talking about. Stop with the dumb ass trades that you and your dumb fellow ranger fans come up with. Even if the Sabres traded Eichel what makes you think you aren’t trading your best player for him. Eichel is a franchise Center who’s going to o be a top 5 player in the league for a long time you don’t get a player like that for a bunch of cap dumps and a goalie prospects. Besides that why the hell would we be giving anything else up with Eichel to get the players you offered. At least use your head if your gonna try to trade for an untouchable player
Shibbal18 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:19 p.m.
#16
Trade is one for one
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 538
Likes: 170
Value is there. However, the only way any team is gonna trade a superstar is if a star and a high potential prospect comes back in return. None of these players fit that quota.
MJCrv liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:21 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
No I know. Sorry my bad haha. I was venting lol. Just exhausted after seeing these proposals todat


I've read 8 million Frederick Andersen to a team that doesn't need him for a 1st and top prospect.

Usually the Rangers are trading Smith to Ottawa to 'help' them get to the floor.

Stevie Yzerman must have owed someone something to take Staal for a 2021 2nd. Now every team with some cap are supposed to help them out. At least Car got pick 13 for taking Marleau's dump from Toronto..
Breadmanhawks and sabres89 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:22 p.m.
#18
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,247
Likes: 9,041
You didnt read the McKenzie rumor in any capacity
Sabres728924 and sabres89 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:31 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 761
Likes: 303
Quoting: Timmah007
Probably going to get blasted fairly hard but I don’t think that’s actually too bad. A tweek or two but foundation is certainly there

Not even close
Sep. 28, 2020 at 11:33 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 761
Likes: 303
Quoting: hockey101
And Chytil, and Georgiev. And like I said, probably more pieces would need to be added.

Yes, add more pieces and subtract the ones you had in there.
Sep. 29, 2020 at 12:31 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Sorry Ranger fans. The rumor was debunked on the Buffalo sports. At the very least his price just shot up into the stratosphere.....
Sep. 29, 2020 at 5:27 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 657
Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


They are losing bodies to free agency and to be harsh they are losing garbage to free agency. Only one I would attempt to bring back is Larsson as a 4th line center. It's not about pieces it's about quality. Eichel is quality and is just about to reach his prime, he has 6 yrs left on a contract he has to honor or go to europe to play...it's that simple. If a team wants him they will have to pay the price and not in the number of pieces in return.
The Pegulas have lost the fans and this trade would anger them even more. So as I have said in other Eichel trades to NY, NY 2020 1st, Zibs and a prospect and NY says no, both parties wish the other luck and they hang up
Sep. 30, 2020 at 8:10 p.m.
#23
Habs_fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 677
Likes: 159
Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


Quoting: hockey101
And what would that solve for them? Getting the 1st overall pick would mean getting Strome, at best and that's it. It is a team in need of depth for next season and the ones after. Not a rookie 1st overall that may not even pan out, and little then. They need pieces now. They are losing a lot of depth to free agency this off-season.

I don't think demanding the 1st overall fixes anything for them. Other than finding themselves back to square 1 when they drafted Eichel and failing since.


I didnt mean adding the 1st overall pick to the trade proposed here. I meant a trade that includes at the least the 1st overall pick.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll