Quoting: EccE
Wild has no interest in that trade. Dermott (RFA) is a huge downgrade from Dumba and Kerfoot is a big downgrade from Ek. Andersen, who has just one year left and has been bad for the last few years, is not enough to compensate. You'll need to add a 1st round pick to that to get the trade talks rolling.
Okay I here you. Tbh I'd probably do a 1st+Freddie and then trade Kerfoot+Dermott elsewhere, or can swap out Dermott and replace with Liljegren as per
@tormundgiantsbane 's suggestion.
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Florida isn't trading Ekblad, And Minnesota declines.
Debatable, but at least admit the packages are fair/verging on fair. Whether they do it or not is another matter.
Quoting: Radu47
Edm would gladly provide some of their mid level assets like Jones & Lavoie in return for that package
Woll was truly awful in the AHL last year (.880) and with Fleury's age... why not keep Campbell ultimately?
I hear you on Woll but Campbell at 1.65 is too pricey IMO. Could try and get another back-up instead of Woll at around 1mil (Hank maybe!?!). As for returns, I'd rather someone take them for picks else it's just replacing a problem with another problem
Quoting: MichaelSimonetta_97
ummmm ull be fired for those brutal trades
You're entitled to your opinion, but it's easy to get bogged down with each individual trade. Yeah okay maybe some of it is overpayment but ultimately looking at the roster before vs after you've got to admit that it has been improved no? and I'd argue I haven't really given anything crucial away apart from Nylander and in return got Ekblad and Dumba. You've got to give something to get something surely.