SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Meier to MTL Blockbuster Rakell to SJ and Haula and Rutta Signings

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 29, 2020
Published: Oct. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Protections

F: couture hertl labanc rakell donato kane dahlen
D: vlasic karlsson simek
G: dubnyk

Burns, Jones, or random-UFA selected by SEA.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. 2021 1st round pick (MTL)
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (TBL)
  4. 2022 1st round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. Meier, Timo ($3,000,000 retained)
2.
ANA
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$75,684,806$0$212,500$5,815,194

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 29, 2020 at 4:59 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,402
Likes: 19,601
Didn't you learn your lesson this year with trading your first? And that was for Erik Karlsson. There is no way 2 years of Rakell is worth a top 5 pick.
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 5:12 a.m.
#2
Le patriote
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 6,354
Likes: 1,410
No, thank we are going to keep Armia, he is with us for a specific task and with the new format of our team he might enjoy been here ! So sorry I in do respect reject your proposal for MTL wink I link your message box to MB so maybe at the deadline we will have further talk ciao là là !
Oct. 29, 2020 at 5:32 a.m.
#3
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Didn't you learn your lesson this year with trading your first? And that was for Erik Karlsson. There is no way 2 years of Rakell is worth a top 5 pick.


Rather harsh wording but yeah Jones/Dubnyk could easily be sub .900 and the team is still quite shabby, most of the core aging too... bleak future indeed
CheechYou liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 5:34 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,402
Likes: 19,601
Quoting: Radu47
Rather harsh wording but yeah Jones/Dubnyk could easily be sub .900 and the team is still quite shabby, most of the core aging too... bleak future indeed


Well my point more stemmed from them starting by trading away their best player for futures
Oct. 29, 2020 at 8:23 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,821
Likes: 14,536
Trading away what will likely be a top 5 pick is....bold.

I cannot imagine Seattle is going to go after an 8 million 36 year old defensemen on a long term deal or a horrible goalie on a horrible contract in the expansion draft.

With all due respect, there seems to be quite a bit of denial amongst Sharks fans as to what they are and how bleak their future is with the bloated, aging contracts.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 9:21 a.m.
#6
Habsnatic
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2016
Posts: 940
Likes: 183
Meier is gonna get a 10m plus qualifying offer in a couple years, which isn't going to work with the Hab's cap structure. Sorry!
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 9:42 a.m.
#7
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
We can’t afford Meier right now, and we definitely can’t afford his $10 million QO. The habs reject.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 10:51 a.m.
#8
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Trading away what will likely be a top 5 pick is....bold.

I cannot imagine Seattle is going to go after an 8 million 36 year old defensemen on a long term deal or a horrible goalie on a horrible contract in the expansion draft.

With all due respect, there seems to be quite a bit of denial amongst Sharks fans as to what they are and how bleak their future is with the bloated, aging contracts.


Agree 100%. We should only base our projections for this upcoming season soley off of last year. Don't take into account previous years.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 12:26 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 28
Getting Meier at 3m for the next 3 years ? done deal !
CheechYou liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 1:37 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 733
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Didn't you learn your lesson this year with trading your first? And that was for Erik Karlsson. There is no way 2 years of Rakell is worth a top 5 pick.


Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Trading away what will likely be a top 5 pick is....bold.

I cannot imagine Seattle is going to go after an 8 million 36 year old defensemen on a long term deal or a horrible goalie on a horrible contract in the expansion draft.

With all due respect, there seems to be quite a bit of denial amongst Sharks fans as to what they are and how bleak their future is with the bloated, aging contracts.


Can change it to MTL's 1st in this scenario instead of SJ's for Rakell.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 733
Quoting: bishopsdad
Meier is gonna get a 10m plus qualifying offer in a couple years, which isn't going to work with the Hab's cap structure. Sorry!


Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
We can’t afford Meier right now, and we definitely can’t afford his $10 million QO. The habs reject.


Just because Meier's QO at the end of the contract in 3 seasons is 10mil DOESN'T mean he's getting 10mil.

If Meier produces in the ballpark of a 10mil player, his starting QO will be 10mil.

If Meier produces as the 6-7mil player he plays as and is worth currently he'll get an offer from SJ/MTL for 6-7mil and if he likes the team/his role, he'll sign for that much. If he likes the team/his role but not too much to the point that he's willing to become a UFA if not qualified at the 10mil bc he thinks he can get 8mil elsewhere, the team can resign him either at 8mil or match an offer that another team gives when he becomes a UFA if he really gets an offer at 8mil.

If he doesn't like the team/his role, he becomes a UFA and signs for 6-7mil elsewhere.
Vachon23 liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,402
Likes: 19,601
Quoting: CheechYou
Can change it to MTL's 1st in this scenario instead of SJ's for Rakell.


But why would you even do that. By trading Meier for futures you are clearly tanking so why would you then trade any 1st for what is essentially a rental.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:14 p.m.
#13
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: CheechYou
Just because Meier's QO at the end of the contract in 3 seasons is 10mil DOESN'T mean he's getting 10mil.

If Meier produces in the ballpark of a 10mil player, his starting QO will be 10mil.

If Meier produces as the 6-7mil player he plays as and is worth currently he'll get an offer from SJ/MTL for 6-7mil and if he likes the team/his role, he'll sign for that much. If he likes the team/his role but not too much to the point that he's willing to become a UFA if not qualified at the 10mil bc he thinks he can get 8mil elsewhere, the team can resign him either at 8mil or match an offer that another team gives when he becomes a UFA if he really gets an offer at 8mil.

If he doesn't like the team/his role, he becomes a UFA and signs for 6-7mil elsewhere.


No matter what happens at the end of the contract, we still can’t afford his current contract.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:26 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 28
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
No matter what happens at the end of the contract, we still can’t afford his current contract.


Why ? Make space for him and trade other players... You don't say know to Timo Meier because your scared of what our salary cap will look like in 3 years... We don't even know what will be the salary cap in 3 years..
CheechYou liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:27 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 733
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
No matter what happens at the end of the contract, we still can’t afford his current contract.


MTL afford Meier at 3mil if they're sending Armia's 2.6mil. 0.4mil is certainly manageable. Trade Kulak and there's room.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:28 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 733
Quoting: Vachon23
Why ? Make space for him and trade other players... You don't say know to Timo Meier because your scared of what our salary cap will look like in 3 years... We don't even know what will be the salary cap in 3 years..


Especially when it's -- as you said -- Timo Meier at 3MIL for another 3 seasons!!!
Vachon23 liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:29 p.m.
#17
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Vachon23
Why ? Make space for him and trade other players... You don't say know to Timo Meier because your scared of what our salary cap will look like in 3 years... We don't even know what will be the salary cap in 3 years..


I’d rather have Danault (who is free) plus 2 1sts than Meier. And you’re insane if you wouldn’t as well.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:40 p.m.
#18
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: CheechYou
MTL afford Meier at 3mil if they're sending Armia's 2.6mil. 0.4mil is certainly manageable. Trade Kulak and there's room.


Quoting: CheechYou
Especially when it's -- as you said -- Timo Meier at 3MIL for another 3 seasons!!!


My bad, I did not notice the retained salary until now. That makes it much more manageable to keep him, although I’m still not 100% sold on paying 2 1sts plus Armia for a guy that it would be nearly impossible to re-sign in 3 years. (Due to the $3-$7 million raise, and the fact that we need to re-sign KK, Suzuki, Romanov, and maybe Caufield before then) And because of his QO he’s almost guaranteed to become a UFA, since he won’t be able to be qualified, and him being on the market drives up his asking price.
CheechYou liked this.
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 28
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
I’d rather have Danault (who is free) plus 2 1sts than Meier. And you’re insane if you wouldn’t as well.


Danault is not in the trade ? you can still keep him, Meier is at 3m for the next 3 years. Trade Byron and you just save 400 000 and let go Tatar. For the late 1st pick I don't trust Timmins with those pick and I prefer the big 30 goals scorer wigner that is just 24 yrs then some suspect
Oct. 29, 2020 at 2:45 p.m.
#20
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Vachon23
Danault is not in the trade ? you can still keep him, Meier is at 3m for the next 3 years. Trade Byron and you just save 400 000 and let go Tatar. For the late 1st pick I don't trust Timmins with those pick and I prefer the big 30 goals scorer wigner that is just 24 yrs then some suspect


I didn’t see the retained salary when I said this, so NVM about that. Although I extremely disagree about the Timmins comment. Can you really say with a straight face that you dislike their drafting in the last 3 years especially?
Oct. 29, 2020 at 3:05 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 28
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
I didn’t see the retained salary when I said this, so NVM about that. Although I extremely disagree about the Timmins comment. Can you really say with a straight face that you dislike their drafting in the last 3 years especially?


It's way to early to comment on the last 3 draft, there is only KK that is in the NHL and we had top 15 pick what we won't have this year especially if you add Meier and look at his resume with 1st round pick between 15-32 It's a disaster (Sherbak/McCarron/Tinordi/Beaulieu/Leblanc/Fisher/Chipchura) The only time he didn't miss is in 2007 with Pac
Oct. 29, 2020 at 3:14 p.m.
#22
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Vachon23
It's way to early to comment on the last 3 draft, there is only KK that is in the NHL and we had top 15 pick what we won't have this year especially if you add Meier and look at his resume with 1st round pick between 15-32 It's a disaster (Sherbak/McCarron/Tinordi/Beaulieu/Leblanc/Fisher/Chipchura) The only time he didn't miss is in 2007 with Pac


I can’t say much for when there was another GM, since I wasn’t a hockey fan and IDK how Gainey & Gauthier ran things. I know that in 2013 the habs’ drafting certainly was hurt by Bergevin’s mandate to pick people with size, and both Bergevin & Timmins have admitted that they made a mistake in 2013. And Scherbak was a skilled player who just didn’t work out. The vast majority of the next 20 or so players drafted after him haven’t worked out at the NHL level. And since then the habs have drafted Juulsen & Poehling who will both be solid NHLers (assuming health). And they’ve done a fairly good job in the later rounds too, specifically with Romanov & Norlinder more recently.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll