SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 way trade with goaltending fix

Created by: CEO
Team: 2020-21 Washington Capitals
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 5, 2021
Published: Jan. 5, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Three way trade works as follows:

Vegas firsts sends Marc-Andre Fleury to New Jersey.

New Jersey then retains 2 500 000, and sends Fleury to Washington. They also send Crwaford to Vegas, reuniting Lehner-Crawford.

Washington recieves Fleury at 4.5 Million, then sends Copley and Nick Jensen to NJD. Then they send a 2023 2nd round pick to Vegas.

BTW im a fan of neither of these 3 teams.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Fleury, Marc-Andre
2$4,500,000
Trades
1.
WSH
NJD
  1. Copley, Pheonix
  2. Jensen, Nick
Additional Details:
Part of 3 way trade
2.
WSH
VGK
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (WSH)
Additional Details:
Part of 3 way trade
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the WSH
2022
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
2023
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$71,044,878$419,749$1,330,000$10,455,122
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$9,538,462$9,538,462
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$9,200,000$9,200,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,166,667$5,166,667
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,350,000$3,350,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,415,000$2,415,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$735,000$735,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Fleury, Marc-Andre
$4,500,000$4,500,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,275,000$1,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$730,000$730K)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2021 at 12:58 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1,017
Just checking if I missed anything. NJ eats $2.5M of MA Fleury, then eats Jensen’s deal, and also gets Copley, and they lose Crawford? I don’t think Jensen is as bad as people make him out to be for what it’s worth, but they are taking on cap in a flat cap world

I don’t think Crawford goes anywhere simply because he was just signed, but I do think Jersey needs more to do it.
yikes and villenash liked this.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 1:01 p.m.
#2
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 2,372
Quoting: NLidstrom
Just checking if I missed anything. NJ eats $2.5M of MA Fleury, then eats Jensen’s deal, and also gets Copley, and they lose Crawford? I don’t think Jensen is as bad as people make him out to be for what it’s worth, but they are taking on cap in a flat cap world

I don’t think Crawford goes anywhere simply because he was just signed, but I do think Jersey needs more to do it.


Yeah I didn't understand why the the 2nd is going to Vegas instead of NJ
yikes, villenash and NLidstrom liked this.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 1:04 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 460
Likes: 9
There's no way NJD trade Crawford who they just signed btw and i think Blackwood just got injured so they're not going for a Copley/Senn tandem, this would be the worst goalie tandem in the NHL even worst than the Delia/Subban 😂
Jan. 5, 2021 at 1:14 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
The only team that I understand the motivation for is Vegas.

Vegas: Dumps a bad $7Mx2 contract and gets a 2nd and Crawford out of it? Usually you don't gain from dumping a bad contract, not that Crawford's contract is good.
NJ: Just signed Crawford but they are moving him out for the right to pay $2.5Mx2 retention, a 6/7D and a 3G.
Wash: Needs to pay $4.5Mx2 for a backup goalie that they don't want. Plus, for the right to that (still) bad contract they give away a 2nd, Jensen (near dump), Copley.

Using mostly what you have here...
Vegas would send Fleury and the compensation of the retention (1st, or such) to NJ.
NJ would retain the full $3.5M (Caps can't take a $4.5M hit for Fleury, not even a $3.5M hit, but I'm going with your AGM) and send him to Was
Wash would send out Jensen and Panik (for cap reasons, they are over the cap as it is so they can not bring in $3.5M/$4.5M and only send out $2.5M (Coplay is 90% burried))

So...
Vegas
- Fleury, 1st
+ Jensen, ($7Mx2 freed cap space)

NJ
- $3.5Mx2 cap hit
+ 1st, Panik

Wash
- Jensen, Panik
+ Fleury ($3.5Mx2)
villenash and CEO liked this.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 1:58 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 668
Quoting: Yojimbo
The only team that I understand the motivation for is Vegas.

Vegas: Dumps a bad $7Mx2 contract and gets a 2nd and Crawford out of it? Usually you don't gain from dumping a bad contract, not that Crawford's contract is good.
NJ: Just signed Crawford but they are moving him out for the right to pay $2.5Mx2 retention, a 6/7D and a 3G.
Wash: Needs to pay $4.5Mx2 for a backup goalie that they don't want. Plus, for the right to that (still) bad contract they give away a 2nd, Jensen (near dump), Copley.

Using mostly what you have here...
Vegas would send Fleury and the compensation of the retention (1st, or such) to NJ.
NJ would retain the full $3.5M (Caps can't take a $4.5M hit for Fleury, not even a $3.5M hit, but I'm going with your AGM) and send him to Was
Wash would send out Jensen and Panik (for cap reasons, they are over the cap as it is so they can not bring in $3.5M/$4.5M and only send out $2.5M (Coplay is 90% burried))

So...
Vegas
- Fleury, 1st
+ Jensen, ($7Mx2 freed cap space)

NJ
- $3.5Mx2 cap hit
+ 1st, Panik

Wash
- Jensen, Panik
+ Fleury ($3.5Mx2)


yours seems more realistic, but Vegas would want a back up goaltender, and I dont think they'd ship a first. How about this:

Vegas:
-Fleury (retaining 500k), whitecloud, 3rd.
+Jensen, Copley

NJ:
-Half of fleury's remaining cap hit (3.25x2)
+Whitecloud, 2nd, Panik

Wash:
-Jensen, Panik, Copley
+Fleury (3.25x2)
tgasp98 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 2:18 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: CEO
yours seems more realistic, but Vegas would want a back up goaltender, and I dont think they'd ship a first. How about this:

Vegas:
-Fleury (retaining 500k), whitecloud, 3rd.
+Jensen, Copley

NJ:
-Half of fleury's remaining cap hit (3.25x2)
+Whitecloud, 2nd, Panik

Wash:
-Jensen, Panik, Copley
+Fleury (3.25x2)


I can't say that I have an opinion on Whitecloud, so maybe he is more than I give credit for...

You also have a 3rd going from Vegas but a 2nd going to NJ. A 3rd isn't going to get it done. There might be an argument if the retention was 1 year, but it is 2 years. You are not going to get a team to "buy" a 3rd rounder for $6.5M. It cost Toronto a first for Carolina to take $6.25Mx1 cap of Marleau, and technically that overall move was only $835,000 in actual dollars for Carolina, yet cost a 1st.

In overall terms, I do not think that adding Coplay hurts the Washington side. I still don't think that they do it, but that's the AGM.
Does Whitecloud+2nd = 1st? I don't know. It's not going to be cheap for free up $7Mx2 though. Fleury is not a starter anymore.
tgasp98 liked this.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 8:24 p.m.
#7
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 1,618
Quoting: Yojimbo
I can't say that I have an opinion on Whitecloud, so maybe he is more than I give credit for...

You also have a 3rd going from Vegas but a 2nd going to NJ. A 3rd isn't going to get it done. There might be an argument if the retention was 1 year, but it is 2 years. You are not going to get a team to "buy" a 3rd rounder for $6.5M. It cost Toronto a first for Carolina to take $6.25Mx1 cap of Marleau, and technically that overall move was only $835,000 in actual dollars for Carolina, yet cost a 1st.

In overall terms, I do not think that adding Coplay hurts the Washington side. I still don't think that they do it, but that's the AGM.
Does Whitecloud+2nd = 1st? I don't know. It's not going to be cheap for free up $7Mx2 though. Fleury is not a starter anymore.


Yeah we aren’t shipping whitecloud and a first out. If they were going to do something like this, they would have this year when they had the 29th pick lol.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 10:12 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: VGKNation702
Yeah we aren’t shipping whitecloud and a first out. If they were going to do something like this, they would have this year when they had the 29th pick lol.


Nobody suggested Whitecloud + 1st.
CEO liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll