SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Make the Cup run this year

Created by: milehigh11
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 21, 2021
Published: Jan. 21, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Would love to get Rakell and Gibson on the Avs. Frankie is already hurt. Grubauer hasnt stayed healthy a whole season and PLAYOFF yet. I dont want the downfall of this team to be goalie once again.

Trade them anyone but Byram and Newhook who are needed for the future.
Trades
ANA
  1. Annunen, Justus
  2. Compher, J.T.
  3. Donskoi, Joonas
  4. Graves, Ryan
  5. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
  6. 2022 1st round pick (COL)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$78,030,359$0$5,425,000$3,469,641
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$874,125$874,125
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000 ($1,175,000$1M$1,175,000$1M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000 ($925,000$925K$925,000$925K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 21, 2021 at 2:22 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 860
Likes: 264
Fancouz gets claimed
Jan. 21, 2021 at 2:23 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Add one of Byram/Newhook if not both. Nothing in this package makes ANA consider moving Gibson let alone him and Rakell

Quality over quantity
MOTDux and villenash liked this.
Jan. 21, 2021 at 2:24 p.m.
#3
Quack Quack Quack!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 493
Likes: 211
Not even close without Byram
Jan. 21, 2021 at 2:26 p.m.
#4
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 2,372
No way Anaheim even considers this. You'd have to add Byram
Jan. 21, 2021 at 2:39 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 725
You'd at least need to give them Grubauer haha... why would ANA do this? I don't think they are that far out from contending, and Gibson is their future. They still want to at least compete, given the Shattenkirk signing. Losing Gibson is basically forfeiture
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2021 at 3:47 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: Salzy
Add one of Byram/Newhook if not both. Nothing in this package makes ANA consider moving Gibson let alone him and Rakell

Quality over quantity


I agree with quantity over quality but you are smoking some premium kush if you think they are adding 2 top 10 in the league prospects at premium positions on ELC’s for a goalie who is coming off a career worse year and arguably has had the 2 worst years of his career. I have much respect for Gibson and he is honestly the only goalie I would consider trading Byram as part of the deal, not for long but I would consider it.
Jan. 21, 2021 at 3:54 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Xqb15
I agree with quantity over quality but you are smoking some premium kush if you think they are adding 2 top 10 in the league prospects at premium positions on ELC’s for a goalie who is coming off a career worse year and arguably has had the 2 worst years of his career. I have much respect for Gibson and he is honestly the only goalie I would consider trading Byram as part of the deal, not for long but I would consider it.


I do smoke and grow premium kush but yeah to get ANA to consider moving Gibson they would have to. Not saying I think they would and I wouldn’t add either of them if I’m COL. Asking price doesn’t equal selling price. Gibson also had terrible teams in front of him those years. Stats don’t tell the whole story and I watch every Ducks game. He has not regressed at all and I would argue he’s better in spite of the stats. With his contract he is without a doubt the most valuable goalie in the league. I know goalies don’t hold value as well in trades but two top prospects would be more than fair imo, prospects aren’t guaranteed while Gibson’s ability is. ANA has no reason to move him or even consider it and any team trying to get him would have to blow them away
Jan. 21, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
#8
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,488
Likes: 3,679
Grubauer was not injured his first year in Denver and played in all 12 of the Avs playoff games. Last year sucked but injuries happen. The "injury-prone" narrative is oversold.
TJTwolf liked this.
Jan. 21, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: Salzy
I do smoke and grow premium kush but yeah to get ANA to consider moving Gibson they would have to. Not saying I think they would and I wouldn’t add either of them if I’m COL. Asking price doesn’t equal selling price. Gibson also had terrible teams in front of him those years. Stats don’t tell the whole story and I watch every Ducks game. He has not regressed at all and I would argue he’s better in spite of the stats. With his contract he is without a doubt the most valuable goalie in the league. I know goalies don’t hold value as well in trades but two top prospects would be more than fair imo, prospects aren’t guaranteed while Gibson’s ability is. ANA has no reason to move him or even consider it and any team trying to get him would have to blow them away


You aren’t getting 2 top 10 prospects for a goalie and I think Gibson has the most value in the league. It would be like ANA trading Zegras AND Drysdale they’d expect a lot more than a goalie. I was using save percentage as the measure and he has had his worst and 3rd worst seasons the last 2 years. But that’s me trying to drive the price down.
Salzy liked this.
Jan. 21, 2021 at 5:28 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Xqb15
You aren’t getting 2 top 10 prospects for a goalie and I think Gibson has the most value in the league. It would be like ANA trading Zegras AND Drysdale they’d expect a lot more than a goalie. I was using save percentage as the measure and he has had his worst and 3rd worst seasons the last 2 years. But that’s me trying to drive the price down.


I agree COL shouldn’t do it, but the point I’m trying to make is ANA has no reason to move him unless they get completely blown away and I doubt only one of them blows them away, a better ask would be one of them and Timmins but honestly I don’t think there is a realistic package out there for Gibson, much like Price when the Habs were bad I don’t see Gibson being moved
Xqb15 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll