Quoting: Tarlam01
Fair value but I think someone like Vaakanainen would be targeted instead of that no name dude
Devils would greatly prefer that no-name dude.
Quoting: bhavikp27
Who's been the better puck-mover? Kulikov or Murray?
Murray. But its close.
I think Murray is better fit for Bruins. Would be cheaper in trade cost, but salary is higher.
And B's have some depth in case he needs off-day for his back.
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
I'd decline this for NJ.
Bjork doesn't really contribute to NJs immediate or future success.
Lohrei looks like a great prospect, but the Devils already have two puck-moving LD (Smith, Butcher). If we're restocking D, a defensive LD (Bahl-type) or RD is a preference.
The 2nd and 5th are throw ins
I disagree and lean towards "accept" from NJD perspective.
Maybe ask for 3rd or 4th instead of the 5th, if one wants to.
But I am bullish on Bjork has long-term 3rd line type. Will fill a lot of holes left open by Coleman's departure (versatility, PK, etc). And needs a change of scenery, new coach.
Lohrei is not simple puck-moving type. He also can put puck on net, which Bahl is having trouble with. And has some serious size (6'4") which Smith, Butcher do not have.
Lohrei has considerably higher ceiling than Vaak, who I'd view as bottom-pair piece.
Its a good trade.