SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Legit offer for Eichel

Created by: treemos27
Team: 2021-22 Vegas Golden Knights
Initial Creation Date: May 10, 2021
Published: May 10, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
VGK
  1. Eichel, Jack ($2,000,000 retained)
BUF
  1. Glass, Cody
  2. Krebs, Peyton
  3. Tuch, Alex
  4. 2021 1st round pick (VGK)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (VGK)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
2022
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
2023
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$81,500,000$73,402,439$285,772$0$8,097,561
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$725,000$725,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,200,000$5,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$8,800,000$8,800,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$725,000$725,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$791,667$791,667
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$1,700,000$1,700,000 ($575,000$575K$575,000$575K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 10, 2021 at 6:18 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
I think you lost when you added retention.
May 10, 2021 at 6:19 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
I think this is a real good deal.
treemos27 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 6:19 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I think you lost when you added retention.


Might have to happen.
May 10, 2021 at 6:20 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
Quoting: treemos27
Might have to happen.


But they wouldn’t retain for 5 years.
May 10, 2021 at 6:23 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
But they wouldn’t retain for 5 years.


They would if the return was 5 strong assets. Competitiveness of the offer + salary restraints you may just have to take the hit.
Leafs retained 1.2m on Kessel when he was traded.
Radu47 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 6:25 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
Quoting: treemos27
They would if the return was 5 strong assets. Competitiveness of the offer + salary restraints you may just have to take the hit.
Leafs retained 1.2m on Kessel when he was traded.


Maybe, guess we’ll have to wait and see cause it seems like the writing is on the wall for Eichel and the Sabres now.
treemos27 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 6:26 p.m.
#7
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Buffalo won't be retaining on Eichel. The talks stop there if it's even brought up. But I think Glass as a natural centre would be the centre piece in a deal. Vegas is high on Krebs, I doubt they include him in the deal. I also don't think they would include Tuch because he played with Eichel in his draft year for the USNDP and went from a third line, mid round prospect to a top line, first round pick. Vegas would likely wanna try that again.

I'd centre the deal around Glass, Hague, and a 2022 1st to start. Then go from there
May 10, 2021 at 6:26 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: treemos27
They would if the return was 5 strong assets. Competitiveness of the offer + salary restraints you may just have to take the hit.
Leafs retained 1.2m on Kessel when he was traded.


And that retention was 6 years
May 10, 2021 at 6:28 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Buffalo won't be retaining on Eichel. The talks stop there if it's even brought up. But I think Glass as a natural centre would be the centre piece in a deal. Vegas is high on Krebs, I doubt they include him in the deal. I also don't think they would include Tuch because he played with Eichel in his draft year for the USNDP and went from a third line, mid round prospect to a top line, first round pick. Vegas would likely wanna try that again.

I'd centre the deal around Glass, Hague, and a 2022 1st to start. Then go from there


Hard to make the salary come even close to working without Tuch.
Vegas likes Krebs sure, but if they are making a push for Jack Eichel you have to make sacrifices.

I personally don't think they hang up the phone on retention. There aren't enough teams who can take on 10 million that easily. The offer is 5 legit assets for one so the retention seems reasonable to me
HOCKEYBOY448 and dzmets liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Maybe, guess we’ll have to wait and see cause it seems like the writing is on the wall for Eichel and the Sabres now.


Thats kinda why I don't think retention is out of the question. Of course Sabres would rather not retain $, but I think their goal is going to be to get the most quality assets possible rather than worry about salary when they aren't even in contention or close to the cap for 3+ years.

The big stress point though is that he kinda HAS to be traded
May 10, 2021 at 6:36 p.m.
#11
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: treemos27
They would if the return was 5 strong assets. Competitiveness of the offer + salary restraints you may just have to take the hit.
Leafs retained 1.2m on Kessel when he was traded.


As well it effectively cues a rebuild so yeah 100% ✔
May 10, 2021 at 6:36 p.m.
#12
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: treemos27
Hard to make the salary come even close to working without Tuch.
Vegas likes Krebs sure, but if they are making a push for Jack Eichel you have to make sacrifices.

I personally don't think they hang up the phone on retention. There aren't enough teams who can take on 10 million that easily. The offer is 5 legit assets for one so the retention seems reasonable to me


The deal doesn't have to be cap in, cap out in the off-season. Teams are allowed to go 10% over the upper limit of the cap in the off-season. Vegas could make a deal for Eichel without Tuch, and then make a deal with another team sometime in the off-season to be cap compliant. As long as they're under the cap by the first game of the regular season, they're fine.

Buffalo won't retain. You can argue there aren't many teams that can afford his cap hit, sure. To which Buffalo comes back with there aren't any players at all like Eichel that are available. Doesn't matter about his cap hit, if you want a player like him then you make the cap work yourself. That's not Buffalo's problem. In a pandemic world where it's a flat cap and money doesn't flow as easy, teams aren't gonna be retaining as much and especially not for that length. You want Eichel, you know what you're getting in cap so you make it work or you don't get him.

With how disgruntled Eichel is, everyone basically knows how it's coming to an end. It will lower the price and if it comes to 1 of Krebs or Glass, Vegas will say they can have Glas but not Krebs. Vegas is doing just fine without Eichel, they don't need to give up a cost controlled A prospect for a guy that they're already winning without. That being said, Glass is a good consolation player and better all around than Krebs. And don't scoff at Hague being included in my idea. He's already capable of playing top 4 minutes at such a young age, and he's a big body that's only getting better. He's been raves about for his leadership ability too. I'd argue he's Vegas' best young player anyways so they're giving up they're best prospect/young player already.
May 10, 2021 at 6:46 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Voice of unreason
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 319
Likes: 128
Quoting: TrueCanuck
The deal doesn't have to be cap in, cap out in the off-season. Teams are allowed to go 10% over the upper limit of the cap in the off-season. Vegas could make a deal for Eichel without Tuch, and then make a deal with another team sometime in the off-season to be cap compliant. As long as they're under the cap by the first game of the regular season, they're fine.

Buffalo won't retain. You can argue there aren't many teams that can afford his cap hit, sure. To which Buffalo comes back with there aren't any players at all like Eichel that are available. Doesn't matter about his cap hit, if you want a player like him then you make the cap work yourself. That's not Buffalo's problem. In a pandemic world where it's a flat cap and money doesn't flow as easy, teams aren't gonna be retaining as much and especially not for that length. You want Eichel, you know what you're getting in cap so you make it work or you don't get him.

With how disgruntled Eichel is, everyone basically knows how it's coming to an end. It will lower the price and if it comes to 1 of Krebs or Glass, Vegas will say they can have Glas but not Krebs. Vegas is doing just fine without Eichel, they don't need to give up a cost controlled A prospect for a guy that they're already winning without. That being said, Glass is a good consolation player and better all around than Krebs. And don't scoff at Hague being included in my idea. He's already capable of playing top 4 minutes at such a young age, and he's a big body that's only getting better. He's been raves about for his leadership ability too. I'd argue he's Vegas' best young player anyways so they're giving up they're best prospect/young player already.


And you very well might be right about that, but Vegas could say the same thing. Don't want to retain to get this package? Ok cool. Have fun trading Eichel for Chytil, Kakko, and a 1st.

Maybe its not 2mill either, could be less, but Buffalo has pretty low leverage considering the player they are trading.

And yes I agree, doesn't necessarily have to be money in money out. Tuch I just thought was good because he adds value to the trade and subtracts cap, but if you could trade Rielly Smith to someone else that might be better.

Ultimately I agree with you, but I don't think its out of the question
TrueCanuck liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 7:56 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,169
Likes: 18,355
If I am Buffalo, I'd want one elite piece back.
Maybe Krebs can become that, maybe even Tuch or Glass or one of those picks.
But I'd want one surefire top line forward, top pair d-man to build around.
treemos27 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll