SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Boston did wrong if you didnt see the mock draft find it

Created by: Gosensgosensgo
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 11, 2021
Published: Sep. 11, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
3.
4.
BOS
  1. 2022 1st round pick (BUF)
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (BUF)
5.
BOS
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (ANA)
6.
BOS
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (ARI)
7.
BOS
  1. 2022 5th round pick (TOR)
8.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (TBL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$79,724,258$1,956,507$265,000$1,775,742
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 11, 2021 at 11:54 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Edited Sep. 11, 2021 at 12:19 p.m.
Congrats, you are the millionth person to redo the 2015 draft. applaud

And this is just bad anyway, this team is worse than the current edition other than C2 an LD1 which you obviously improved. While the bottom 6 is bad by AHL standards.

Went from a team with 5 high end players and a solid surrounding cast to 7 high end players that is very shallow..

Then there is the cap, which is cap tight with a 20 man roster.

The only thing they truly did wrong was draft Senyshyn. The rest of the picks while not popular or best on the board by any means were still defensible at the time considering team needs, desire, and not significant reaches. Draft is a crapshoot. Some players pan out some don’t. Hindsight is easy.

And that does not even begin to touch the butterfly affect of how everything gets altered after that. You alter the standings and pics for every team after 2015. Maybe Mac is taken before Boston picks next year because of altered rosters, standings, needs. And that is just one instance.
LogicOnly, KennyBoi and A_Habs_fan liked this.
Sep. 11, 2021 at 12:02 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 1,156
but every team can do something like this
LogicOnly liked this.
Sep. 11, 2021 at 12:16 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,520
Likes: 19,668
You forgot to remove Pastrnak because there is not chance he falls anywhere remotely close to 25th in 2014. Can't just complain about where you messed up once and ignore the time when you got insanely lucky
LogicOnly liked this.
Sep. 11, 2021 at 12:29 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Congrats, you are the millionth person to redo the 2015 draft. applaud

And this is just bad anyway, this team is worse than the current edition other than C2 an LD1 which you obviously improved. While the bottom 6 is bad by AHL standards.

Went from a team with 5 high end players and a solid surrounding cast to 7 high end players that is very shallow..

Then there is the cap, which is cap tight with a 20 man roster.

The only thing they truly did wrong was draft Senyshyn. The rest of the picks while not popular or best on the board by any means were still defensible at the time considering team needs, desire, and not significant reaches. Draft is a crapshoot. Some players pan out some don’t. Hindsight is easy.

And that does not even begin to touch the butterfly affect of how everything gets altered after that. You alter the standings and pics for every team after 2015. Maybe Mac is taken before Boston picks next year because of altered rosters, standings, needs. And that is just one instance.


Quoting: linehan10
but every team can do something like this


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You forgot to remove Pastrnak because there is not chance he falls anywhere remotely close to 25th in 2014. Can't just complain about where you messed up once and ignore the time when you got insanely lucky


Yep, these are dumb
I have seen and said it a billion times, these are so annoying.

I saw some guy a while back that made a realistic one and it was actually very good:
The idea being that he looked at their projected draft position, the position they played, etc.. and determined that the bruins were right so pick debrusk and zboril (given their positions / projections), but like a Senyshyn would ahve been replaced by Barzal who was actually a top 10 prospect. etc etc etc...
Vaakanienen was a solid pick, but someone like Studnicka coulda been reaplced by Ukko Pekka Lukkonen (though that might still be a good move but studnicka isnt that bad)
Sep. 11, 2021 at 12:52 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: LogicOnly
Yep, these are dumb
I have seen and said it a billion times, these are so annoying.

I saw some guy a while back that made a realistic one and it was actually very good:
The idea being that he looked at their projected draft position, the position they played, etc.. and determined that the bruins were right so pick debrusk and zboril (given their positions / projections), but like a Senyshyn would ahve been replaced by Barzal who was actually a top 10 prospect. etc etc etc...
Vaakanienen was a solid pick, but someone like Studnicka coulda been reaplced by Ukko Pekka Lukkonen (though that might still be a good move but studnicka isnt that bad)


Lol, that was you with a different account. 😉
Sep. 11, 2021 at 2:06 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol, that was you with a different account. 😉


What are you talking about
Sep. 11, 2021 at 4:14 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Huh? why do I feel like I've seen something like this before? Oh right because it's been done a lot and beaten to death. My favorite part though is people act like everything else remains the same after change picks lol.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll