Edited Oct. 2, 2021 at 9:02 a.m.
Quoting: dopplsan
If they wanted to/had to trade, they would have to add an asset. And yes, buying him out would be easy for one more year, since he is under 26. After next season's buyout window, it goes up.
But also, to your point, they don't want to or have to. My issue was just with the initial premise of Colin White in any way being near an equal trade asset as Laine.
Yes, remove White from this equation, unless Columbus specifically asks for him, but I'd surprised as there is a ton of guys in the Sens organization already better or who will be better. Why would they ask for the 3rd liner with inflated AAV? I agree that he's not adding value here. It's just money in money out as Laine will also cost money in the next few years.
Quoting: dopplsan
If you really want to boil it down to "look only at least year," then you are missing an obscene amount of the picture. White doesn't have any track record to speak of, only one good/decent season. Even by that logic, Laine at his worst is still six point better than White, all while being a year younger. Added, Laine is not signed for four more years at a rate far beyond his value. Points to OTT for gambling on White with that long-term extension out of the ELC, but it doesn't look like it has panned out.
As for Brannstrom, cracking an NHL lineup for a 2-15-17 line through 63 games playing with a rebuilding club does not a 1st+ make.
Quickly, White's signing was very contextual. Melnyk had alienated the fanbase and they were going through a MASSIVE firesale. White was signed to a long term contract to show a sign to the fanbase that they were going to commit to hockey players once again. And since Colin White is Thomas Chabot's best friend, Chabot then signed a 8 years contract like a month later. They knew it was a "risky gamble" with White but one that had to be done. Chabot is the first cornerstone of the rebuild, he had to be signed at all costs.
Finally, don't look at it like if Brannstrom "can't crack the lineup". This would be another long context to explain but quickly, the Sens are taking their damn time to graduate their prospects (lottery picks Stutzle and Tkachuk being the exceptions but one is ultra skilled and the other a physical monster), and they have all the LUXURY to do so as a FULL rebuilding team (100% roster turnover from the 2017 ECF run)
For example, Formenton could have become a full NHLer way before this season. Even in 2018-19, his speed was already elite and he was strong enough to play a bottom-6 role, already aware defensively. But they wanted him to develop more and have 1 full season in the AHL. Like Norris last year, he didn't really to play there.... ETC
There actually would be more to explain because Dorion doesn't seem to prioritize "asset management" very much so he's not putting all his assets in a position to take value. It's kinda weird to me because I and my family basically live off managing assets. You'd think asset management would be extremely important for a manager at this level. To be honest, sometimes I have no idea what Dorion is doing (like waiving Balcers to protect much worse players like Anisimov/Paquette/Galchenyuk/Stepan or giving up a 2nd for a declined Derek Stepan)
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Eh, not really. I would think our best ones would be Tyler Benson, and Cooper Marody. Sadly, or I would trade you them if that’s what it would take to get Connor Brown. We got some decent normal prospects if you wanted them. But yah, I wouldn’t move him if I was Ottawa not unless a team gave me a big return.
I'm pretty convinced that Connor Brown will be extended after his current contract.
But lol forget all this. I just realized you were talking about Connor. I responded you talking about Logan Brown
Connor Brown isn't a reclamation project and Tyler Benson/Cooper Marody won't be pieces considered to acquire him unless they suddenly "break out"