SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Auston Matthews

Created by: Eli
Team: 2021-22 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 1, 2021
Published: Nov. 1, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Won't happen. You heard it here first.
Trades
1.
2.
NYR
    Future considerations
    3.
    ARI
    1. Kerfoot, Alexander
    2. 2022 2nd round pick (STL)
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    2023
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    2024
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$81,355,844$0$1,200,000$144,156
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $737,500$737,500
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $11,642,857$11,642,857
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $2,300,000$2,300,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $3,641,667$3,641,667
    C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,350,000$5,350,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $775,000$775,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $750,000$750,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,666,667$5,666,667
    G
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $900,000$900,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $750,000$750,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,800,000$3,800,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $874,125$874,125
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    RW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 6:28 p.m.
    #26
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2021
    Posts: 3,649
    Likes: 806
    Not a bad offer, Leafs would definitely listen, but if we accept this trade, we will be going into a re-build
    GenXHockey and Eli liked this.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 6:28 p.m.
    #27
    i dunno
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 1,080
    Likes: 293
    Quoting: Eli
    Responding to a Rangers fan clowning around that they could get Matthews for Kravtsov and some junk from behind their dresser.

    Also, likes don't matter on CapFriendly, so maybe next time post an actual opinion or analysis, rather than just an unclear insult?

    The conversation was about what it would take to get Tor fans to consider moving Matthews. I got some neutral fans to say it looked fair. That's more than Rangers fans got. You're very welcome.


    its not even close to fair tho lol

    its one of the best defensive pairings in the league, along with three of the best prospects in the league, and a 1st round pick. plus youre trading matthews with a super injury prone goalie and two other pretty useless players. what in the world would make you think this is fair?

    also posting unclear insults is a lot more fun than posting actual opinions or analysing.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:07 p.m.
    #28
    Ballards Curse
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 1,055
    Likes: 271
    Quoting: Eli
    Built and posted. See above comment for link, and for my agreement that it's not as amazing as it looks, for Toronto. As a side note, Morgan Barron is a weak 4C on a cheap contract. Kerfoot is a 3C on an okay contract. Trading them to clear 2.6M or so of cap helps sign Kakko's bridge deal. Moving Mrazek and Ritche helps sign Lafreniere. The Leafs still need to move Brodie, who has an NTC, to sign Fox. Or they lose Fox to a big offer sheet and get a lot of picks.


    haha dont have to deal with Fox getting offer sheeted anymore
    Eli liked this.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:12 p.m.
    #29
    Thread Starter
    Who adds what?
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 13,677
    Likes: 2,703
    Quoting: tea
    its not even close to fair tho lol

    its one of the best defensive pairings in the league, along with three of the best prospects in the league, and a 1st round pick. plus youre trading matthews with a super injury prone goalie and two other pretty useless players. what in the world would make you think this is fair?

    also posting unclear insults is a lot more fun than posting actual opinions or analysing.


    Matthews is the best US born goal scorer in the game. The Rangers are owned by a cable company in the biggest TV market in the US. Do you get more highlights from really good puck possession or from forty goals a year? Do you get more ratings from highlights of a takeaway or a breakaway? The Rangers take this. The Leafs probably don't.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:23 p.m.
    #30
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Are you calling fox a defensemen that the leafs wouldn’t need?


    Yes, fox is a defensemen that the leafs don’t need. Leafs currently need zero Dmen.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:25 p.m.
    #31
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 14,017
    Likes: 4,585
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    Yes, fox is a defensemen that the leafs don’t need. Leafs currently need zero Dmen.


    No, the leafs need good d men. Fox would be their best. If fox was magically put on the leafs right now he would be the teams second best player.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:25 p.m.
    #32
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: tea
    its not even close to fair tho lol

    its one of the best defensive pairings in the league, along with three of the best prospects in the league, and a 1st round pick. plus youre trading matthews with a super injury prone goalie and two other pretty useless players. what in the world would make you think this is fair?

    also posting unclear insults is a lot more fun than posting actual opinions or analysing.

    Who would you say is the best prospect here Crappo or the imaginary one you made up?
    Eli liked this.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
    #33
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    No, the leafs need good d men. Fox would be their best. If fox was magically put on the leafs right now he would be the teams second best player.


    You are confusing want with need. I don’t disagree that he is awesome. Leafs just have no needs on the blueline right now. None in the foreseeable future either.
    Eli liked this.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:30 p.m.
    #34
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 14,017
    Likes: 4,585
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    You are confusing want with need. I don’t disagree that he is awesome. Leafs just have no needs on the blueline right now. None in the foreseeable future either.


    They do. If they didn’t, they would be good.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:32 p.m.
    #35
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    They do. If they didn’t, they would be good.


    And they are, kind of a dumb non point.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:32 p.m.
    #36
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 14,017
    Likes: 4,585
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    And they are, kind of a dumb non point.


    Hey if this is what success looks like to you, by all means enjoy it.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 7:35 p.m.
    #37
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Hey if this is what success looks like to you, by all means enjoy it.


    Thank you, I will.
    Nov. 1, 2021 at 8:47 p.m.
    #38
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,629
    Likes: 1,515
    Quoting: Eli
    Okay. What lines would you make?


    The entire post is nonsense. Having Mika center the 3rd line on any team is also pure nonsense. Not worth discussing.
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 3:19 a.m.
    #39
    i dunno
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 1,080
    Likes: 293
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    And they are, kind of a dumb non point.


    they're 4-4-1 and -8, and they havent made it past the 1st round in 17 years. theyre not a good team and their defense clearly sucks lmfao
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 3:22 a.m.
    #40
    i dunno
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 1,080
    Likes: 293
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    Who would you say is the best prospect here Crappo or the imaginary one you made up?


    well both laffy and kakko are gonna be great, and barrons a top center prospect who's looked really good in his nhl games.

    also who cares about matthews, hes rubbish in the playoffs and now rubbish in the regular season too. id much rather have zibanejad than him
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 5:47 a.m.
    #41
    Thread Starter
    Who adds what?
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 13,677
    Likes: 2,703
    Edited Nov. 2, 2021 at 5:53 a.m.
    Quoting: tea
    who cares about matthews, hes rubbish in the playoffs and now rubbish in the regular season too. id much rather have zibanejad than him


    Matthews has five more playoff points in one more career playoff game than Zibanejad, 24 in 32 to 19 in 31. Five more. In one more game. Even though he's younger and hasn't been past the first round. Because he at least gets his team there, consistently, and gets a few points each time. How much is five playoff points?

    Zibanejad had five points in the six game series that established him as a top six center, the 2017 2nd round loss to the Senators when he moved up from the third line because Rick Nash wasn't producing, the whole team was struggling, and maybe the coaches thought he could do well against his old team. He did fine. Pageau did better, with six points, helping Ottawa win.

    That was the series that launched the Senators to the conference finals and in part encouraged the Sharks and Lightning to trade two 1st picks and a prospect each for a couple of defensemen. It also somehow encouraged many teams to overpay for virtually everyone who took a shift at center in that series on either team: Pageau, Hayes, Turris, Stepan, Brassard, Dzingel, and now Zibanejad have each signed at least one contract that some of their teams' fans have eventually, or will eventually come to question. Maybe some team will sign Lindberg for $5M next year? Or Miller at 10M? They were there, too. Don't leave them out, GMs. Lindberg, with three goals and a positive plus/minus, actually did better in that series than Holden, Skjei, Fast, Girardi, Smith, Kreider, or Staal. He was then claimed in the expansion draft, and no longer plays in the NHL, because the Rangers value playoff performance. Clearly.

    Anyway, if you take out those five points in six games, Zibanejad in the playoffs has a less impressive 14 points in his other 25 games. But it gets better if you take out his other second round series, when he got zero points in five games against PIttsburgh, and was -6. Wow. So clutch. Can't imagine why the Senators traded him.

    And, yes, if you take out every series the Leafs lost, Matthews hasn't been to the playoffs, yet, and is pointless, but if you take out every series Zibanejad played after he was Matthews age, that does not change Zibanejad's numbers much.

    Quoting: delneggs
    The entire post is nonsense. Having Mika center the 3rd line on any team is also pure nonsense. Not worth discussing.


    I looked up projected lineups for Team Sweden at the Olympics. Everyone thinks Pettersson plays 1st line center, which I'm fine with, and sure enough, everyone's pencilled Zibanejad in at 2nd line center. You said a good way to compare centers is how much they do in the playoffs. And you said there's no team where Zibanejad should center the third line. I'm not sure if he'll be healthy in time for the Olympics, but Nick Backstrom has 108 points in 133 NHL playoff games, and has won the Stanley Cup.

    Obviously the Rangers aren't going to build around Backstrom because they can't afford him. Out of what's remotely possible, Matthews is pretty good.
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 6:04 a.m.
    #42
    i dunno
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 1,080
    Likes: 293
    Quoting: Eli
    Matthews has five more playoff points in one more career playoff game than Zibanejad, 24 in 32 to 19 in 31. Five more. In one more game. Even though he's younger and hasn't been past the first round. Because he at least gets his team there, consistently, and gets a few points each time. How much is five playoff points?

    Zibanejad had five points in the six game series that established him as a top six center, the 2017 2nd round loss to the Senators when he moved up from the third line because Rick Nash wasn't producing, the whole team was struggling, and maybe the coaches thought he could do well against his old team. He did fine. Pageau did better, with six points, helping Ottawa win.

    That was the series that launched the Senators to the conference finals and in part encouraged the Sharks and Lightning to trade two 1st picks and a prospect each for a couple of defensemen. It also somehow encouraged many teams to overpay for virtually everyone who took a shift at center in that series on either team: Pageau, Hayes, Turris, Stepan, Brassard, Dzingel, and now Zibanejad have each signed at least one contract that some of their teams' fans have eventually, or will eventually come to question. Maybe some team will sign Lindberg for $5M next year? Or Miller at 10M? They were there, too. Don't leave them out, GMs. Lindberg, with three goals and a positive plus/minus, actually did better in that series than Holden, Skjei, Fast, Girardi, Smith, Kreider, or Staal. He was then claimed in the expansion draft, and no longer plays in the NHL, because the Rangers value playoff performance. Clearly.

    Anyway, if you take out those five points in six games, Zibanejad in the playoffs has a less impressive 14 points in his other 25 games. But it gets better if you take out his other second round series, when he got zero points in five games against PIttsburgh, and was -6. Wow. So clutch. Can't imagine why the Senators traded him.

    And, yes, if you take out every series the Leafs lost, Matthews hasn't been to the playoffs, yet, and is pointless, but if you take out every series Zibanejad played after he was Matthews age, that does not change Zibanejad's numbers much.



    I looked up projected lineups for Team Sweden at the Olympics. Everyone thinks Pettersson plays 1st line center, which I'm fine with, and sure enough, everyone's pencilled Zibanejad in at 2nd line center. You said a good way to compare centers is how much they do in the playoffs. And you said there's no team where Zibanejad should center the third line. I'm not sure if he'll be healthy in time for the Olympics, but Nick Backstrom has 108 points in 133 NHL playoff games, and has won the Stanley Cup.

    Obviously the Rangers aren't going to build around Backstrom because they can't afford him. Out of what's remotely possible, Matthews is pretty good.


    first of all, zibanejad's projected to be the 1c for team sweden. yes backstrom has been good in the playoffs and in internationals, but he's 33 years old, he's not exactly in his prime. the top 2 centers, even if backstrom is healthy, would be zibanejad and pettersson, no question.


    now, discussing zibanejads playoff points is pointless, because since the last time he's been in the playoffs (not counting the play-in round) he's gotten significantly better. he was pretty good in the 2017 playoffs, but since then he's gone from a solid 20 goal scorer to one of the best goal scorers in the NHL. another thing of note, zibanejad has been in the 2nd round, i think that immediately makes him a better playoff performer than matthews, until matthews proves otherwise.

    i was also clearly joking about matthews, he's a generational talent, and a future hall of famer, but trading adam fox who's probably, at least offensively, the best defenseman in the league, plus his linemate, PLUS three other top prospects including two top 2 picks, PLUS A 1ST ROUND PICK is ridiculous, even for matthews. that's assuming any of the previously mentioned players are touchable, which they aren't. neither team is trading any of them.
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 7:44 a.m.
    #43
    Thread Starter
    Who adds what?
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 13,677
    Likes: 2,703
    Quoting: tea
    first of all, zibanejad's projected to be the 1c for team sweden. yes backstrom has been good in the playoffs and in internationals, but he's 33 years old, he's not exactly in his prime. the top 2 centers, even if backstrom is healthy, would be zibanejad and pettersson, no question.


    now, discussing zibanejads playoff points is pointless, because since the last time he's been in the playoffs (not counting the play-in round) he's gotten significantly better. he was pretty good in the 2017 playoffs, but since then he's gone from a solid 20 goal scorer to one of the best goal scorers in the NHL. another thing of note, zibanejad has been in the 2nd round, i think that immediately makes him a better playoff performer than matthews, until matthews proves otherwise.

    i was also clearly joking about matthews, he's a generational talent, and a future hall of famer, but trading adam fox who's probably, at least offensively, the best defenseman in the league, plus his linemate, PLUS three other top prospects including two top 2 picks, PLUS A 1ST ROUND PICK is ridiculous, even for matthews. that's assuming any of the previously mentioned players are touchable, which they aren't. neither team is trading any of them.



    Since the 2017 playoffs, when Zibanejad became a top six forward with the Rangers, the top five Swedish-born goal scorers in the NHL playoffs are Forsberg, W. Karlsson, Backstrom, Burakovsky, and Hornqvist. Zibanejad is in a six-way tie for 25th. Just in playoff goals in the NHL by guy born in Sweden. Two of the guys he's tied with no longer play in the NHL, including Oscar Lindberg, who got three goals in the second round, when it mattered, rather than just one goal per series, for Zibanejad, in that time.

    If you measure from the next year's playoffs, when Zibanejad was a better regular season goal scorer, Backstrom is still in the top five forwards, but Hedman is the team's best goal scorer. Since Hedman plays low on the left point, Sweden could use a center who is good at passing the puck across to someone at that spot. Any ideas? Oh. And in that time, Zibanejad has just one playoff goal, and does not belong in this conversation.
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 7:59 a.m.
    #44
    Thread Starter
    Who adds what?
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 13,677
    Likes: 2,703
    Edited Nov. 2, 2021 at 10:01 a.m.
    Quoting: tea

    i was also clearly joking about matthews, he's a generational talent, and a future hall of famer, but trading adam fox who's probably, at least offensively, the best defenseman in the league, plus his linemate, PLUS three other top prospects including two top 2 picks, PLUS A 1ST ROUND PICK is ridiculous, even for matthews. that's assuming any of the previously mentioned players are touchable, which they aren't. neither team is trading any of them.


    Okay.. Cool. I agree that Fox isn't leaving New York. When I posted this, I had forgotten (or hadn't read yet? Who knows) that he signed an extension, and I didn't know that he had talked his previous team into trading him to his hometown.

    So I posted a different dose of realism on Matthews' value, but you're not gonna like it, either, because the new centerpiece is Zibanejad. I figured, between you saying it made no sense to build a team with Zib at 3C, and Toronto fans above saying it made no sense to trade their only #1C for spare defensemen, probably a more realistic Matthews trade was gonna be Zibanejad and all of the Rangers' best prospects. Not sure on which ones those are, but in the years that they've both been great goal scorers, Matthews has 37 more regular season goals than Zibanejad, and Zib has 37 more than Zucker or Skinner. I don't think Skinner and a 2nd gets the Rangers on the phone, so as a Caps fan, I'm trying to be realistic about how the Ranges and Leafs could work together, here. If you don't want to see it, that's fine. I don't think either side is desperate to trade. On the other hand, a team with Fox, Matthews, Kreider, Panarin, Schneider, Barron, Miller, and Reunanen has a lot of potential. And yes, those are the prospects I didn't trade. smile

    anyway, here's a link if you can't help yourself. https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/525316?post_id=2766529
    Nov. 2, 2021 at 1:27 p.m.
    #45
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,629
    Likes: 1,515
    Quoting: Eli
    Matthews has five more playoff points in one more career playoff game than Zibanejad, 24 in 32 to 19 in 31. Five more. In one more game. Even though he's younger and hasn't been past the first round. Because he at least gets his team there, consistently, and gets a few points each time. How much is five playoff points?

    Zibanejad had five points in the six game series that established him as a top six center, the 2017 2nd round loss to the Senators when he moved up from the third line because Rick Nash wasn't producing, the whole team was struggling, and maybe the coaches thought he could do well against his old team. He did fine. Pageau did better, with six points, helping Ottawa win.

    That was the series that launched the Senators to the conference finals and in part encouraged the Sharks and Lightning to trade two 1st picks and a prospect each for a couple of defensemen. It also somehow encouraged many teams to overpay for virtually everyone who took a shift at center in that series on either team: Pageau, Hayes, Turris, Stepan, Brassard, Dzingel, and now Zibanejad have each signed at least one contract that some of their teams' fans have eventually, or will eventually come to question. Maybe some team will sign Lindberg for $5M next year? Or Miller at 10M? They were there, too. Don't leave them out, GMs. Lindberg, with three goals and a positive plus/minus, actually did better in that series than Holden, Skjei, Fast, Girardi, Smith, Kreider, or Staal. He was then claimed in the expansion draft, and no longer plays in the NHL, because the Rangers value playoff performance. Clearly.

    Anyway, if you take out those five points in six games, Zibanejad in the playoffs has a less impressive 14 points in his other 25 games. But it gets better if you take out his other second round series, when he got zero points in five games against PIttsburgh, and was -6. Wow. So clutch. Can't imagine why the Senators traded him.

    And, yes, if you take out every series the Leafs lost, Matthews hasn't been to the playoffs, yet, and is pointless, but if you take out every series Zibanejad played after he was Matthews age, that does not change Zibanejad's numbers much.



    I looked up projected lineups for Team Sweden at the Olympics. Everyone thinks Pettersson plays 1st line center, which I'm fine with, and sure enough, everyone's pencilled Zibanejad in at 2nd line center. You said a good way to compare centers is how much they do in the playoffs. And you said there's no team where Zibanejad should center the third line. I'm not sure if he'll be healthy in time for the Olympics, but Nick Backstrom has 108 points in 133 NHL playoff games, and has won the Stanley Cup.

    Obviously the Rangers aren't going to build around Backstrom because they can't afford him. Out of what's remotely possible, Matthews is pretty good.


    First off, I never said anything about how to rank centers, so that's just BS. Secondly, Backstrom gets his points from Ovi, who makes his numbers look better. Mika on the other hand makes his line mates better by his all around play. Third, I was talking NHL teams, not Olympic or all star teams. And lastly, we are talking in present day terms, so what a player did 5 or 6 years ago is meaningless. Right now, TODAY, Mika is better than both of the centers you mention . Your entire post, again, is nonsense.
    Nov. 3, 2021 at 1:56 a.m.
    #46
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: tea
    well both laffy and kakko are gonna be great, and barrons a top center prospect who's looked really good in his nhl games.

    also who cares about matthews, hes rubbish in the playoffs and now rubbish in the regular season too. id much rather have zibanejad than him


    Lafreniere isn’t a prospect Crappo is gone to the khl and Barron is 22 and hasn’t cracked the Rangers roster. Your evaluation of players is a joke.
    Nov. 3, 2021 at 1:59 a.m.
    #47
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: delneggs
    First off, I never said anything about how to rank centers, so that's just BS. Secondly, Backstrom gets his points from Ovi, who makes his numbers look better. Mika on the other hand makes his line mates better by his all around play. Third, I was talking NHL teams, not Olympic or all star teams. And lastly, we are talking in present day terms, so what a player did 5 or 6 years ago is meaningless. Right now, TODAY, Mika is better than both of the centers you mention . Your entire post, again, is nonsense.


    Drugs are bad.
    Eli liked this.
    Nov. 3, 2021 at 2:29 a.m.
    #48
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,629
    Likes: 1,515
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    Drugs are bad.


    Agreed, you should stop taking them.
    Nov. 3, 2021 at 2:37 a.m.
    #49
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: delneggs
    Agreed, you should stop taking them


    Mika is better than both of the centers you mention


    That is some Hunter S Thompson level ****ed out of your tree thinking right there.
    Eli liked this.
    Nov. 3, 2021 at 3:00 a.m.
    #50
    i dunno
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 1,080
    Likes: 293
    Quoting: GenXHockey
    Lafreniere isn’t a prospect Crappo is gone to the khl and Barron is 22 and hasn’t cracked the Rangers roster. Your evaluation of players is a joke.


    you know kakko and kravtsov are different people right? tf

    also the leafs have spent 17 years not cracking the 2nd round, and theyll probably take longer to get past the 2nd round than barron'll take to play in the 2nd round, just felt like mentioning that
    GenXHockey liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll