SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shaking things up with Miller Trade

Created by: hockeybadger
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 17, 2021
Published: Nov. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,160,659$648,780$2,550,000$1,339,341
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 17, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,938
Likes: 19,041
Pretty solid trade for both sides. Well done
Nov. 17, 2021 at 2:41 p.m.
#2
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Digging one hole to fill another is a bad strategy for both of these teams.

As much as I hate the "FIRRREEEEE EVERYBODYYYYY!!!!" nonsense from fans (of every team) every time their team loses a few games, I really, really do think it's time for a new vision in Vancouver.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 2:42 p.m.
#3
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Pretty solid trade for both sides. Well done


I don't disagree that it's likely fair, but I'd be worried about replacing Carlo's minutes on the back end. That thins it out a ton.
palhal and hockeybadger liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 2:52 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20,048
Likes: 8,960
Nope. 1st, Debrusk or 1st, Studnicka, mid level prospect like Olson. Sure. No Carlo. Nucks need to cut cap space anyway not add to it.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 3:19 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 594
Quoting: Gofnut999
Nope. 1st, Debrusk or 1st, Studnicka, mid level prospect like Olson. Sure. No Carlo. Nucks need to cut cap space anyway not add to it.


That doesn’t get you Miller. Gotta give to get
Nov. 17, 2021 at 3:27 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20,048
Likes: 8,960
Quoting: Aasen6
That doesn’t get you Miller. Gotta give to get


Cool keep him. He’s not worth more than that. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Nov. 17, 2021 at 3:34 p.m.
#7
nhn1405
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 704
Likes: 162
that would be a perfect trade for vancouver. exactly what we need

miller stings to lose but they get younger and itll help down the road
Nov. 17, 2021 at 5:22 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,938
Likes: 19,041
Quoting: Lenny7
I don't disagree that it's likely fair, but I'd be worried about replacing Carlo's minutes on the back end. That thins it out a ton.


Shouldn't be hard.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 8:45 p.m.
#9
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 1,107
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Shouldn't be hard.


ah yes a young top 4 RHD that plays 20 minutes a night won't be hard to replace. RHD is a hot commodity in this league especially ones on a team friendly deal. There is a much bigger skill difference between carlo and clifton then between coyle and miller. im all fine with giving debrusk, 1st and a prospect or more picks but carlo is off limits.

Carlo is basically untouchable he is a massive need for our team. miller not so much for vancouver they have 3 1c capable centers in miller, petey, horvat, yes he obviously is very skilled player and helps the team but again for them to lose miller and have petey go to 1c isn't a massive downgrade compared to carlo to clifton unless a third team is invloved that gives a bruins a RHD to replace carlo there's no way sweeney does this deal
Lenny7 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:06 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,938
Likes: 19,041
Quoting: Dekes
ah yes a young top 4 RHD that plays 20 minutes a night won't be hard to replace. RHD is a hot commodity in this league especially ones on a team friendly deal. There is a much bigger skill difference between carlo and clifton then between coyle and miller. im all fine with giving debrusk, 1st and a prospect or more picks but carlo is off limits.

Carlo is basically untouchable he is a massive need for our team. miller not so much for vancouver they have 3 1c capable centers in miller, petey, horvat, yes he obviously is very skilled player and helps the team but again for them to lose miller and have petey go to 1c isn't a massive downgrade compared to carlo to clifton unless a third team is invloved that gives a bruins a RHD to replace carlo there's no way sweeney does this deal


I didn’t mean to sound like I was low on Carlo. He is a bread and butter guy for Bs. I just think his minutes could be replaced more easily than a top-6 point-per-game center.

Of course if Coyle is playing better this year vs last year, it’s all moot. Just keep him for 2C. But if not, Miller may be a fit as Krejci replacement.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:13 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
hockeybadger
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 311
Likes: 83
Quoting: Lenny7
I don't disagree that it's likely fair, but I'd be worried about replacing Carlo's minutes on the back end. That thins it out a ton.


We'll toss in a freshly vaxxed Hamonic or signed Poolman lol
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:17 p.m.
#12
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 1,107
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I didn’t mean to sound like I was low on Carlo. He is a bread and butter guy for Bs. I just think his minutes could be replaced more easily than a top-6 point-per-game center.

Of course if Coyle is playing better this year vs last year, it’s all moot. Just keep him for 2C. But if not, Miller may be a fit as Krejci replacement.



here is the thing for coyle with me, He's back....... but i do not think he is the guy for that line of hall-coyle-smith/foligno, they are all net drivers all of them are goal scorers, we don't have a pure passer on that line which is the reason why hall isn't absolutely destroying the stat sheet. I do believe miller would put that line over the top if it was hall-miller-coyle, as he can make those long strech passes and take a sacrifice to the goal totals to make sure hall and whoever coyle/foligno/smith are putting up the goal numbers. I think bruins could find a replacement for carlo to an extent like manson but i think sweeney's long term goals are to build the O around pasta, lysell(hopefully if he becomes what he is projected to be), and studnicka, maybe even steen too the kid is balling in the AHL 10p in 7g and is 2p in 2g in the nhl and then the D is built around Mcavoy, carlo, lohrei, goalie will be Swayman for the future. so unless bruins are getting a young player u25 in return for carlo i just can't see him moving him as that screws with us now and for later post bergy, marchy era. In terms of value yes miller is higher quality but how many u24 6'5+ RHD dman are in the nhl right now Carlo, Cernak, Seider? pretty slim picking
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:33 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,938
Likes: 19,041
Quoting: Dekes
here is the thing for coyle with me, He's back....... but i do not think he is the guy for that line of hall-coyle-smith/foligno, they are all net drivers all of them are goal scorers, we don't have a pure passer on that line which is the reason why hall isn't absolutely destroying the stat sheet. I do believe miller would put that line over the top if it was hall-miller-coyle, as he can make those long strech passes and take a sacrifice to the goal totals to make sure hall and whoever coyle/foligno/smith are putting up the goal numbers. I think bruins could find a replacement for carlo to an extent like manson but i think sweeney's long term goals are to build the O around pasta, lysell(hopefully if he becomes what he is projected to be), and studnicka, maybe even steen too the kid is balling in the AHL 10p in 7g and is 2p in 2g in the nhl and then the D is built around Mcavoy, carlo, lohrei, goalie will be Swayman for the future. so unless bruins are getting a young player u25 in return for carlo i just can't see him moving him as that screws with us now and for later post bergy, marchy era. In terms of value yes miller is higher quality but how many u24 6'5+ RHD dman are in the nhl right now Carlo, Cernak, Seider? pretty slim picking


A Studnicka break-out would solve a lot of problems for Boston (at least it sounds that way) if he could become that playmaking center.

In NJ, Taylor Hall’s MVP season came with rookie 18-yr old center (Hischier). It was a season-long, “Here, let me do it”
Dekes liked this.
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:40 p.m.
#14
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,064
Likes: 1,107
Quoting: NHLfan10506
A Studnicka break-out would solve a lot of problems for Boston (at least it sounds that way) if he could become that playmaking center.

In NJ, Taylor Hall’s MVP season came with rookie 18-yr old center (Hischier). It was a season-long, “Here, let me do it”


ya true stud is a high energy 2 way guy he put on over 20 pounds in the offseaon which was crazy because he got faster too. i think he should get more try's at that 2c spot, definitely will for sure next season, i think he has the potential to be a solid 2c but only time will tell really as for right now though unless it's just chemistry issues i think bruins need to target a ryan strome or jt miller as they are basically the closest things bruins can find that resemble krech's game and that we should be able to afford and look how well hall and smith did with krech that whole line was ppg or just under once hall was acquired at the TD
Nov. 17, 2021 at 9:54 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 594
Quoting: Gofnut999
Cool keep him. He’s not worth more than that. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Clearly you don’t watch him then, he’s quite possibly the most versatile forward in the nhl he can play powerplay and penalty kill, match up against other teams top lines, score at a point a game pace and play any of the 3 forward positions. That’s worth a whole lot more than the cap dumb debrusk is and a late 1st
Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:13 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20,048
Likes: 8,960
Edited Nov. 18, 2021 at 12:44 a.m.
Quoting: Aasen6
Clearly you don’t watch him then, he’s quite possibly the most versatile forward in the nhl he can play powerplay and penalty kill, match up against other teams top lines, score at a point a game pace and play any of the 3 forward positions. That’s worth a whole lot more than the cap dumb debrusk is and a late 1st



I do watch him and know exactly who he is and what his value is. He’s worth a 1st and a quality prospect and mid range prospect.

And Debrusk is not a cap dump and the pick won’t be late. At least by my definition of late anyway. You keep dreaming for 3 top 10 picks though 👍🏻 Let me know how that works out.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 6:35 a.m.
#17
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: telmax
We'll toss in a freshly vaxxed Hamonic or signed Poolman lol


tears of joy That'll fix it...
hockeybadger liked this.
Nov. 18, 2021 at 1:18 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 594
Quoting: Gofnut999
I do watch him and know exactly who he is and what his value is. He’s worth a 1st and a quality prospect and mid range prospect.

And Debrusk is not a cap dump and the pick won’t be late. At least by my definition of late anyway. You keep dreaming for 3 top 10 picks though 👍🏻 Let me know how that works out.


The 1st will most likely be in the last 1/3 of the first round which I consider late, also you just said what you think he’s worth but the trade you suggested doesn’t match that. We agree on the first and the extra prospect but debrusk or studnicka are not “quality prospects” the only one of those boston has is Lysell
Nov. 18, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20,048
Likes: 8,960
Edited Nov. 18, 2021 at 3:49 p.m.
Quoting: Aasen6
The 1st will most likely be in the last 1/3 of the first round which I consider late, also you just said what you think he’s worth but the trade you suggested doesn’t match that. We agree on the first and the extra prospect but debrusk or studnicka are not “quality prospects” the only one of those boston has is Lysell


The your evaluation of the prospects is incorrect. Lysell is high end prospect. Studnicka is a quality prospect with middle 6 ceiling who is NHL ready and no place to play.

Every team trying to acquire players down the stretch are playoff caliber team and will pick in the bottom half. The idea the pick has no value is laughable. Last season Boston finished 3rd in division and picked 21st -Lysell. A pick everyone scoffed at as late and now everyone wants. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Almost every team that trades a 1st comes with top 10 protection these days. And the reality is from pick 16 to 40 the quality is pretty much the same. Boston will be picking on the same area again.

As far as Debrusk goes the take on him on here is laughable. A 24 year old who has not hit UFA status that has averaged 23g per 82 games is considers a bust, a cap dump, valueless, a trade detriment. It’s a joke.

Yes he had a terrible year tied multiple reasons. Deeper look shows reality.

Year 1 19 goals 11 shooting %
Year 2 27 goals 18.5 %. Not sustainable and unrealistic
Year 3 16 goals 11%
Year 4 5 goals 5.9 % with lots of reasons behind it
This year back to 12% and on pace for 15-20 goal season

The expectations that he is going to be 30g 70p player off of draft slot and year 2 is ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as basing his value off of last year. He’s a 20g 40p guy. That has value. Far more than most prospects.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll