so fleury goes from being aquired for free to a former first round pick playing his rookie season and a goalie that was just aquired for a first and a fairly good prospect? thats going to be a no from Colorado

COL declines easily.

Barron will be an everyday NHL player within a year or two and Kuemper cost the Avs a 1st plus young NHL ready D prospect (Timmins).
Not interested in a 37 y/o rental G for the cost of essentially two firsts (Barron and the 1st they gave ARI for Kuemper) and Timmins

Huge huge undervalue of Kane, especially at 50% retention and I am not even a Hawks fan.

in no way is MAF getting a return such as that, MAF isnt even an upgrade over Kuemper and you think he gets you a top prospect who is NHLready? Yikes

Constructive criticism:

You way undervalued the return on Kane especially retaining that much, a 1st rd pick added wouldn’t be out of line.

The COL trade is just bad, @coga16 summarized this trade the best.

Why in the world would you want a forward who can’t stay healthy, stay with Kubalik all day.

The d package meh get what you can is about right.

Strome, if somebody had offered a 3rd by now I think he would be gone. He needs to play with skilled players to get points as a passenger and his defense kinda sucks. Not exactly the most appealing of combinations.

Take off the fan glasses bud, if you don't think Flowers behind a much worse defense is better then Kuemper behind a much better defense you then are lost. Kuemper is a good goalie, but I'm willing to bet almost every GM in the league would rather have Flowers in the playoffs then Kuemper

Easy pass for the Avs.