SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

HMMHMH

Created by: OwenMd05
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 10, 2022
Published: Feb. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Fleury, Marc-André ($3,500,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
2.
3.
PHI
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Samorukov, Dmitri
  3. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
4.
NYI
  1. Kassian, Zack
  2. 2023 1st round pick (EDM)
5.
SEA
  1. Yamamoto, Kailer
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,330,664$669,339$907,500$5,169,336

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$0$0
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,675,000$4,675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 10, 2022 at 12:33 p.m.
#1
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 670
Trading lots of assets for Fleury is very dumb. He’s also really really old. If the oilers want to keep Connor around and have sustained success, you can’t keep relying on 35+ Year old goalies hoping they don’t drop off. See Mike Smith.

I like the Seattle deal.
Don’t hate the islanders deal but seems like a 1st for a bottom pairing dman even with Kassian contract is a bit much.
Philly deal is an overpay IMO. I dont think Sanheim is much of an impact player. A 1st, good prospect and Barrie seems high if you ask me. Maybe I don’t fully understand Sanheims game
Feb. 10, 2022 at 12:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Isles decline. It will cost at the very minimum a 1st withkut taking the terrible kassian deal for mayfield
Feb. 10, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
#3
Chris Peralta
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 369
I don't know about this one chief
Feb. 10, 2022 at 12:47 p.m.
#4
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,546
Likes: 11,435
Seattle probably goes for it. Not sure about Edmonton, but they are desperate enough to do it so they don;t make McD start feeling antsy. I would not hold my breath on the rest.
Feb. 10, 2022 at 12:58 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,239
Likes: 9,645
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
Trading lots of assets for Fleury is very dumb. He’s also really really old. If the oilers want to keep Connor around and have sustained success, you can’t keep relying on 35+ Year old goalies hoping they don’t drop off. See Mike Smith.

I like the Seattle deal.
Don’t hate the islanders deal but seems like a 1st for a bottom pairing dman even with Kassian contract is a bit much.
Philly deal is an overpay IMO. I dont think Sanheim is much of an impact player. A 1st, good prospect and Barrie seems high if you ask me. Maybe I don’t fully understand Sanheims game


Mike Smith is older and boy did he look great last night against Flowers! smile
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Feb. 10, 2022 at 1:23 p.m.
#6
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 670
Quoting: ChiHawk
Mike Smith is older and boy did he look great last night against Flowers! smile


Not sure what your point is? Move valuable assets because a goalie played great against you?
Smith was incredible last year but Oilers fans rightfully wanted to upgrade going into this season but Holland couldn’t get it done. Now look at your goaltending.

Fleury is very clearly still a strong goalie. But how does it make sense for a struggling team like the oilers to move one of their few valuable assets to get a goalie who has 1 maybe 2 years left of good hockey in him? He’s also a UFA so no guarantee we get more than 15 games out of him. Not exactly sustainable. Skinner shows promising signs, but the oilers don’t exactly have a sure-thing in the pipeline. With limited free agent goalie available, we are way better off trading for a younger goalie even if it costs more
Feb. 10, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,239
Likes: 9,645
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
Not sure what your point is? Move valuable assets because a goalie played great against you?
Smith was incredible last year but Oilers fans rightfully wanted to upgrade going into this season but Holland couldn’t get it done. Now look at your goaltending.

Fleury is very clearly still a strong goalie. But how does it make sense for a struggling team like the oilers to move one of their few valuable assets to get a goalie who has 1 maybe 2 years left of good hockey in him? He’s also a UFA so no guarantee we get more than 15 games out of him. Not exactly sustainable. Skinner shows promising signs, but the oilers don’t exactly have a sure-thing in the pipeline. With limited free agent goalie available, we are way better off trading for a younger goalie even if it costs more


The intent is if the Oilers are trying or not to make a run this year. If they are, and that was stated with the acquisition of E Kane, then it makes all the sense to get a desperate upgrade in net as it is clearly a major weak point of the team.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Feb. 10, 2022 at 5:40 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: ChiHawk
The intent is if the Oilers are trying or not to make a run this year. If they are, and that was stated with the acquisition of E Kane, then it makes all the sense to get a desperate upgrade in net as it is clearly a major weak point of the team.


Don't see E Kane and MAF getting along after last night.
ChiHawk liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll