SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2022-2023

Created by: Reason
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2022
Published: Feb. 18, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Some trades made at the 2022 TDL, some in the 2022 off season.

I know NYR fans will say no, just as I know the Canucks wont move Horvat, that's fine this is my AGM.

Even though this is essentially gutting the roster, I look at this as a retool instead of a rebuild. The main reason being that the majority of the pieces coming back are prospects that are ready to play in the NHL, not picks that are years away from their first NHL game. This strategy also clears a lot of cap space for additions in the offseason.

I really like the forward groups future potential here at all positions. The defense could still use some additions but with the current players under contracts it will be difficult to add to many pieces in the mix. Ideally they draft heavy on defence going forward.

Not all of the prospects will be ready for the NHL next season, which is why I have included a "5th" line. That line has been good in the shutdown role this season and would be the 4th line after cuts are made for the start of next season.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$925,000
2$1,050,000
2$1,050,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
6$9,000,000
4$5,000,000
4$2,000,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Schenn, Luke
Additional Details:
Anywhere
2.
VAN
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (LAK)
NSH
    Motte

    Anywhere
    3.
    4.
    VAN
    1. Lapierre, Hendrix
    2. 2022 2nd round pick (WPG)
    5.
    VAN
    1. Kravtsov, Vitali [RFA Rights]
    NYR
    1. Klimovich, Danila
    2. 2022 3rd round pick (NSH)
    6.
    VAN
    1. Lundkvist, Nils
    2. Othmann, Brennan
    3. 2022 2nd round pick (NYR)
    Additional Details:
    The later of NYR 2022 2nd round picks
    NYR
    1. Miller, J.T. ($2,000,000 retained)
    7.
    VAN
    ANA
    1. Dickinson, Jason
    Additional Details:
    If you can find a team to take him for nothing or a mid - late round pick them move him. If not, keep him and don't sign Motte.
    8.
    VAN
    1. 2022 5th round pick (TOR)
    ANA
    1. Burroughs, Kyle
    Additional Details:
    Anywhere
    9.
    VAN
    1. Drury, Jack
    2. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
    Additional Details:
    Drury is very good prospect who from my understanding, from reading some CAR articles, would already be on the roster if it wasent so deep. Would add some insurance for a possible future 2C if Horvat was traded.
    CAR
    1. Horvat, Bo
    Additional Details:
    This is the trade I am the least sure of value wise, even though I know NYR will probably disagree...
    CAR is in win now mode, and the should be, and Horvat would be a great addition. He could push JK to the wing and give CAR possibly the deepest center depth in the East or possibly the league.
    10.
    CGY
    1. Poolman, Tucker
    Additional Details:
    Could be Dickinson.
    Main this is Calgary moves an under preforming player and clear cap space.
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2023
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2024
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    24$81,500,000$80,192,500$1,250,000$2,050,000$1,307,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $9,000,000$9,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,350,000$7,350,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $6,375,000$6,375,000
    C, LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $863,333$863,333
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $925,000$925,000
    C
    RFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $894,167$894,167
    LW
    RFA - 4
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$50,000$50K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    C, LW
    UFA
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    LD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,260,000$7,260,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $845,000$845,000
    RD
    RFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $762,500$762,500
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 18, 2022 at 8:35 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 6,565
    Likes: 3,279
    Rather have Othmann at $925k for 3 years than Miller. Dude looks like he can step in next year and be fantastic.
    Feb. 18, 2022 at 8:57 p.m.
    #2
    Breadman likes Bread
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 3,492
    Likes: 1,729
    Othmann’s been fantastic in juniors, no way we move on from him till we see what he has at the pro level.
    Feb. 18, 2022 at 8:59 p.m.
    #3
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 8,764
    Likes: 3,508
    First of all, Drury is now likely to be called up due to Trocheck’s injury, so he is not available, now or next year. Drury also likely steps into the lineup full time next year, so Canes pass on that aspect as well. Secondly, while JK can play wing, he is so much better at Center, and that is where he will stay.

    Rangers and Caps pass on those offers.
    Feb. 18, 2022 at 9:27 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2021
    Posts: 112
    Likes: 26
    I don't think we will trade Horvat
    Reason liked this.
    Feb. 18, 2022 at 11:16 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,696
    Likes: 3,362
    I love Drury but I think his ceiling is Horvat. I’d probably take this deal as it provides extra insurance both this year and next year if Troch leaves. I’d probably counter with a 2nd and a 5th instead of the 1st tho if we’re losing Drury.
    Reason liked this.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 9:46 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    Rather have Othmann at $925k for 3 years than Miller. Dude looks like he can step in next year and be fantastic.


    I mean that’s a fair comment.

    In my opinion, lots of players excel at the junior level in their draft plus one season but still take a few years to translate that success to the NHL level, if they do at all.
    Othmann is definitely a good prospect which is why I included him in this deal, if the Canucks are trading Miller and reports state the cost starts at an elite prospect and a 1st, I think it’s got to be one of either Schneider or Othman and Rangers fans really don’t want to part with Schneider.
    I think there are only a handful of teams that should be in on Miller and I think the Rangers are a team close enough to contention that they make sense as a trading partner. I can understand your reluctance to want to part with Othmann though.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 9:50 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Edited Feb. 19, 2022 at 9:57 a.m.
    Quoting: KingLundqvist30
    Othmann’s been fantastic in juniors, no way we move on from him till we see what he has at the pro level.


    I can see why people would be reluctant to trade Othmann but that is the type of prospect that Vancouver would want in any Miller trade. The Canucks won’t trade a player of Miller’s caliber for prospects that teams are not reluctant to part with.
    As I mentioned in an above post, I think the Rangers are one of the few teams that make sense to part with some good assets for a player like Miller, you guys have a good team over there that could be ready to make some noise in the post season.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 9:55 a.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Quoting: evelutions2
    First of all, Drury is now likely to be called up due to Trocheck’s injury, so he is not available, now or next year. Drury also likely steps into the lineup full time next year, so Canes pass on that aspect as well. Secondly, while JK can play wing, he is so much better at Center, and that is where he will stay.

    Rangers and Caps pass on those offers.


    I mean you are certainly entitled to your opinion, however I disagree with most of it.
    I have seen similar, if not the same, trade proposals in the past and all but the NYR trade tend to fairly positive (relatively speaking to Capfriednly AGM’s) responses to them.
    As for the Rangers trade, it’s going to take a prospect that a team really doesn’t want to part with to acquire Miller. For the Rangers I see those prospects as Othmann and Schneider.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 9:59 a.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Quoting: KingBanzai
    I don't think we will trade Horvat


    I don’t think we will either, but I think we should if we can get the right return.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 11:50 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    The issue with the Horvat trade is that Horvat is a C. Aho - Trocheck - Staal - Kotkaniemi is already one of, if not, the deepest center core(s) in hockey. Another winger would be ideal. He'd be probably the 4C, if not playing on the wing.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 11:52 a.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    Quoting: evelutions2
    First of all, Drury is now likely to be called up due to Trocheck’s injury, so he is not available, now or next year. Drury also likely steps into the lineup full time next year, so Canes pass on that aspect as well. Secondly, while JK can play wing, he is so much better at Center, and that is where he will stay.

    Rangers and Caps pass on those offers.


    Trocheck isn't meant to be out long term. Just means Stepan will play 4C

    https://twitter.com/WaltRuff/status/1494871614533558278?s=20&t=l16qqDdyPshHFnppohq8FQ
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 2:46 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 6,565
    Likes: 3,279
    Quoting: Reason
    I mean that’s a fair comment.

    In my opinion, lots of players excel at the junior level in their draft plus one season but still take a few years to translate that success to the NHL level, if they do at all.
    Othmann is definitely a good prospect which is why I included him in this deal, if the Canucks are trading Miller and reports state the cost starts at an elite prospect and a 1st, I think it’s got to be one of either Schneider or Othman and Rangers fans really don’t want to part with Schneider.
    I think there are only a handful of teams that should be in on Miller and I think the Rangers are a team close enough to contention that they make sense as a trading partner. I can understand your reluctance to want to part with Othmann though.


    Personally wouldn’t move those two guys. Rangers are not as close as people think they are despite what the record indicates. Miller isn’t signed long term and we wouldn’t be able to afford to resign him anyway. Plus I’d prefer to avoid adding another almost 30 year old to the roster. I think 10 years of Othmann and Schneider is far superior then anything Miller can do for us in 1.5 years because I don’t see us winning a cup and that’s the only scenario where he is worth trading for.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 5:44 p.m.
    #13
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    Personally wouldn’t move those two guys. Rangers are not as close as people think they are despite what the record indicates. Miller isn’t signed long term and we wouldn’t be able to afford to resign him anyway. Plus I’d prefer to avoid adding another almost 30 year old to the roster. I think 10 years of Othmann and Schneider is far superior then anything Miller can do for us in 1.5 years because I don’t see us winning a cup and that’s the only scenario where he is worth trading for.


    Very fair comment and one I completely agree with.
    If you don’t think you stand a good chance to win it all, you don’t part with significant assets for a player like Miller. If their GM feels like they are, that’s when those types of deals make sense.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 5:47 p.m.
    #14
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: vikhodush
    I love Drury but I think his ceiling is Horvat. I’d probably take this deal as it provides extra insurance both this year and next year if Troch leaves. I’d probably counter with a 2nd and a 5th instead of the 1st tho if we’re losing Drury.


    Not sure if the Canucks would take a 2nd and a 5th instead of a 1st because Drury has been rumored to be on his way out of the Canes organization because he's more of a B+ prospect rather than a legit A-level prospect
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 5:48 p.m.
    #15
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    The issue with the Horvat trade is that Horvat is a C. Aho - Trocheck - Staal - Kotkaniemi is already one of, if not, the deepest center core(s) in hockey. Another winger would be ideal. He'd be probably the 4C, if not playing on the wing.


    Horvat as the 4C, smh sleepy
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 5:50 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Horvat as the 4C, smh sleepy


    He doesn't beat out Aho. He doesn't beat out Trocheck. Staal won't be moved from 3C for love nor money. He's the 4C
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 5:54 p.m.
    #17
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    He doesn't beat out Aho. He doesn't beat out Trocheck. Staal won't be moved from 3C for love nor money. He's the 4C


    He probably doesn't beat out Trocheck, but he most definitely beats out Staal, that's where I have to say you're wrong. No other Canes fan would try to make this argument besides you because it, like you, is ridiculous
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 6:39 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    He probably doesn't beat out Trocheck, but he most definitely beats out Staal, that's where I have to say you're wrong. No other Canes fan would try to make this argument besides you because it, like you, is ridiculous


    No, he doesn't beat out Staal. If Staal was going to be beaten out of that 3C spot, Kotkaniemi would already be there. Staal's used as a defensive C man, and he's miles better than anyone else in this conversation at it.

    Also, you think no other Canes fan would say Staal won't move from the 3C spot? @Ecupriate07 @evelutions2 will both tell you the same thing. Staal will not move from 3C for love nor money.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 6:40 p.m.
    #19
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    No, he doesn't beat out Staal. If Staal was going to be beaten out of that 3C spot, Kotkaniemi would already be there. Staal's used as a defensive C man, and he's miles better than anyone else in this conversation at it.

    Also, you think no other Canes fan would say Staal won't move from the 3C spot? Ecupriate07 evelutions2 will both tell you the same thing. Staal will not move from 3C for love nor money.


    Horvat is better than KK, that's the difference, but we can agree to disagree
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 6:42 p.m.
    #20
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Horvat is better than KK, that's the difference, but we can agree to disagree


    Is he? Kotkaniemi is scoring at 5v5 rate similar to Auston Matthews and Nathan MacKinnon... really want to make this argument? KK's had an INSANE year, but because he's a depth piece in a smaller market, no one will notice him. (Look it up on NST if you want)
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 6:47 p.m.
    #21
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Is he? Kotkaniemi is scoring at 5v5 rate similar to Auston Matthews and Nathan MacKinnon... really want to make this argument? KK's had an INSANE year, but because he's a depth piece in a smaller market, no one will notice him. (Look it up on NST if you want)


    Despite those numbers, KK has still been somewhat inconsistent this season, and don't try to argue his lack of ice time in his favor because if he was truly playing as well as you suggest, he'd be getting more of it. Bottom line is that it doesn't sound like the market for KK is all that hot, and that's not because he is untouchable by the Canes
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 6:59 p.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,696
    Likes: 3,362
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Not sure if the Canucks would take a 2nd and a 5th instead of a 1st because Drury has been rumored to be on his way out of the Canes organization because he's more of a B+ prospect rather than a legit A-level prospect


    I think it’s a fair statement to say they might not take a 2&5 instead of a 1 but I have yet to see a rumor that Drury is on the way out of the organization. Quite the contrary - he’s not a high end prospect but he’s projecting as a middle 6C and likely fills Staals role longer term. Canes FO and coaching staff love the kid and every chance he’s gotten he’s made it hard on them to send him back down but bc of organizational depth especially at C there’s no room for him. He’ll be on the squad full time next year tho barring putting him in a trade like this for an already established NHLer.
    Knuckl3s liked this.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 7:13 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,786
    Likes: 5,078
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Despite those numbers, KK has still been somewhat inconsistent this season, and don't try to argue his lack of ice time in his favor because if he was truly playing as well as you suggest, he'd be getting more of it. Bottom line is that it doesn't sound like the market for KK is all that hot, and that's not because he is untouchable by the Canes


    That's your poor assumption. KK's been FANTASTIC since he moved to C. If you're going to argue he didn't play well against Toronto, Ottawa or Boston in the recent games like some other idiot did, HE WAS ON COVID PROTOCOL! He's been ULTRA consistent, and he's still scoring. The teams podcast has said the team has had interest in KK, and the team don't want to move him. So, in both regards, you're incorrect.

    The reason Kotkaniemi doesn't get more Time is because... where's he going to play? He's not displacing Trocheck. Staal isn't coming off the shutdown line... KK's been fantastic. Don't try and argue that because he's not getting ice time, he's not playing well, because you KNOW that's wrong.
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 7:24 p.m.
    #24
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2021
    Posts: 12,418
    Likes: 2,630
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    That's your poor assumption. KK's been FANTASTIC since he moved to C. If you're going to argue he didn't play well against Toronto, Ottawa or Boston in the recent games like some other idiot did, HE WAS ON COVID PROTOCOL! He's been ULTRA consistent, and he's still scoring. The teams podcast has said the team has had interest in KK, and the team don't want to move him. So, in both regards, you're incorrect.

    The reason Kotkaniemi doesn't get more Time is because... where's he going to play? He's not displacing Trocheck. Staal isn't coming off the shutdown line... KK's been fantastic. Don't try and argue that because he's not getting ice time, he's not playing well, because you KNOW that's wrong.


    Again, you and I are simply taking opposite sides of an argument with no middle ground to break the stalemate. You have not demonstrated any ability to critique your own team like many fans are capable of doing, because despite being cup contenders this season, they still aren't perfect. Jordan Staal's contract is tough for how little offense he produces, shutdown forwards or defensemen don't provide 6 million AAV in value by being black hole's offensively. I'm also hearing other Canes fans say that they could use another 3rd pair defenseman

    Why are people accusing KK of not playing well in certain games if he was in covid protocol? Either he played in the game and didn't play well, or he didn't play and didn't have the chance to turn in a bad performance. I'm so confused. If KK is playing as well as you say he is, then he should totally displace Trocheck and be getting more ice time, I don't get your logic either
    Feb. 19, 2022 at 7:33 p.m.
    #25
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 8,764
    Likes: 3,508
    I know that we have voiced our different opinions before @Knuckl3s but in terms of Horvat getting played at C, he doesn’t get past Aho or Trocheck, and with how the Canes are currently structured, we technically have 2 3rd lines. You have the defensive and excellent transition line of Nino Staal Fast, and what is set as a 4th line but is better described as a 3B line of Martinook KK Lorentz/Stepan that has been utilized more often in offensive points compared to the 3A line I just mentioned. If the Canes acquired Horvat, he would be in the same situation as KK, and would be utilized in the same way. Staal would be the 3C and Horvat would be the 4C, but it would be more of a 3A/3B kind of situation.

    And as for your assessment of the difference between KK and Horvat, the difference is Horvat has either already or is about to peak, whereas KK still has room to grow. As it stands, Horvat is better than KK, I will agree with you there, but a couple years down the road, nobody can be sure. And while Horvat could push KK to the wing, he won’t because KK has proven that he is a natural center, and his game as a whole is better when he plays at C. He has a decent LW game, but he is just better suited for C.

    We can agree to disagree now, but in the long run, I do think that KK could be better than Horvat. Also, Drury isn’t being traded. He makes the roster full time next year, and likely replaces Staal as the Canes future 3C whenever Staal either leaves or retires.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll