SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Clutterbuck Giroux Kulak

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 22, 2022
Published: Feb. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Note: I know this is a 24 man roster but it's only to show what I'd have the playoff lines as. Maltsev is waiver exempt and can stay in the AHL until the playoffs or if/when someone goes on IR. Until then Helm or Newhook would play 4C to ensure a 23 man roster.

A 4th line of MacDermid-Maltsev-Clutterbuck would be a monster to play against. Clutterbuck is 2nd in the league in hits, and MacDermid and Maltsev are 1st and 2nd on the Avs in hits/60 at 5v5 this season.
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Clutterbuck, Cal ($1,750,000 retained)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
Isles fans please share your feedback on this. I'm curious what you feel is fair value with the pick here (if any pick should even be included at all). Not really sure how valued Jost would be for you.
2.
COL
  1. Giroux, Claude ($4,137,500 retained)
PHI
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Helleson, Drew [Reserve List]
  3. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
3.
COL
  1. Kulak, Brett ($925,000 retained)
MTL
  1. 2024 4th round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$76,578,130$1,741,463$3,432,500$4,921,870
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$0$0
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$0$0
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 22, 2022 at 5:39 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 166
Likes: 89
I think Habs say yes
Richard88 and JackForHart liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 5:58 p.m.
#2
Juraj Slapshotsky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 583
Quoting: Snipe52
I think Habs say yes


Half retained will need a 3rd. But yeah no retention = probably a 4th
Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:09 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Tarlam01
Half retained will need a 3rd. But yeah no retention = probably a 4th


A reasonable comparable is Nemeth who at 50% retained ($3m caphit down to $1.5m) only got a 4th last year. Kulak would require less money and cap retained than that. Not to mention that this is shaping up to be a buyers market. Keep in mind that retention isn't really something special in deadline trades anymore, it's pretty standard practice given that most contenders are at the cap ceiling or into LTIR already.

That said thank you for commenting and offering some feedback. smile
Tarlam01 liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.
#4
Juraj Slapshotsky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 583
Quoting: Richard88
A reasonable comparable is Nemeth who at 50% retained ($3m caphit down to $1.5m) only got a 4th last year. Kulak would require less money and cap retained than that. Not to mention that this is shaping up to be a buyers market. Keep in mind that retention isn't really something special in deadline trades anymore, it's pretty standard practice given that most contenders are at the cap ceiling or into LTIR already.

That said thank you for commenting and offering some feedback. smile


Oh no doubts on that. Just feel like a sub 1m Kulak will fetch quite an interest in the league. 30ish 4th rounders will get beaten so if the Avs want him they will probably have to give their 3rd instead just to beat the other teams. Kulak isn't anything flashy but is a solid mobile 6th D on a 3rd pair. Only thing that can play against him is that there are plenty of depth LHD on the market compared to RHD (Lyubushkin kind of return)
Richard88 liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:19 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,585
Likes: 9,206
Is Clutterbuck really such an upgrade over NAK that it warrants moving Jost?
NMAvsFan and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Edited Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:58 p.m.
Quoting: Xqb15a
Is Clutterbuck really such an upgrade over NAK that it warrants moving Jost?


That's an interesting way to look at it. I wouldn't necessarily see it like Clutterbuck being an upgrade on NAK, though I suppose that's what it looks like with this roster. Bear in mind that you wouldn't need to play MacDermid every game, meaning that you can have a NAK-Maltsev-Clutterbuck line which is also a handful physically. Also, injuries happen so there's every likelihood that NAK would be playing most games anyways despite being listed here as the 13th forward. Playoff depth is incredibly important, and I'd rather have 2 of NAK/Helm/MacDermid to draw into the lineup as 12th forward than unproven rookies like last year.

Also worth noting that the return on Clutterbuck here includes a 3rd, which would allow us to build up some capital for the draft given that we only have one pick in the first 4 rounds. Not that collecting picks is the most important thing for a contender obviously, but if you can upgrade the 4th line for this run while also having an eye on the future that would be solid asset management. Granted, there would need to be a plan for 3C next year with Jost gone, because we'd be rolling with Newhook as the only middle 6 C on the team going into next season.
NMAvsFan and Xqb15a liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 6:45 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Tarlam01
Oh no doubts on that. Just feel like a sub 1m Kulak will fetch quite an interest in the league. 30ish 4th rounders will get beaten so if the Avs want him they will probably have to give their 3rd instead just to beat the other teams. Kulak isn't anything flashy but is a solid mobile 6th D on a 3rd pair. Only thing that can play against him is that there are plenty of depth LHD on the market compared to RHD (Lyubushkin kind of return)


If the Avs have to pony up a 3rd for Kulak then I think Sakic looks elsewhere, or just offers a lesser prospect as a throw-in with a 4th. Maybe that offer would be beat (especially since it's a 2024 pick) but so be it, there will be plenty of Dmen available and someone will blink at the last second, just like Yzerman with Nemeth and Dorion with Namestnikov (both for 4th's).
Tarlam01 and NMAvsFan liked this.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 8:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,585
Likes: 9,206
Quoting: Richard88
That's an interesting way to look at it. I wouldn't necessarily see it like Clutterbuck being an upgrade on NAK, though I suppose that's what it looks like with this roster. Bear in mind that you wouldn't need to play MacDermid every game, meaning that you can have a NAK-Maltsev-Clutterbuck line which is also a handful physically. Also, injuries happen so there's every likelihood that NAK would be playing most games anyways despite being listed here as the 13th forward. Playoff depth is incredibly important, and I'd rather have 2 of NAK/Helm/MacDermid to draw into the lineup as 12th forward than unproven rookies like last year.

Also worth noting that the return on Clutterbuck here includes a 3rd, which would allow us to build up some capital for the draft given that we only have one pick in the first 4 rounds. Not that collecting picks is the most important thing for a contender obviously, but if you can upgrade the 4th line for this run while also having an eye on the future that would be solid asset management. Granted, there would need to be a plan for 3C next year with Jost gone, because we'd be rolling with Newhook as the only middle 6 C on the team going into next season.


Maltsev as the 4C going into the playoffs is not what I would call a comfortable position to be in.
Feb. 22, 2022 at 9:43 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Xqb15a
Maltsev as the 4C going into the playoffs is not what I would call a comfortable position to be in.


Why not? The guy does everything you want from a 4C except PK but that seems to be more of a trust thing due to his newness to the team rather than ability.

Some stats to note:

- 1st on the Avs in hits/60 at 5v5;
- 1st in takeaways/60 at 5v5;
- Corsi of 56%
- over 57% on faceoffs;
- 6'3'' so can handle himself against big opponents;

His scoring hasn't been great obviously (0 points in 18) and you'd like that to be higher, but it's worth noting that his on-ice shot% is super low at 2.60% and his PDO is 92.5, both of which indicate that he's been unlucky. He's scoring at near-PPG pace in the AHL (28 points in 34 games) which suggests that there's plenty of skill there to contribute on the scoreboard at the NHL level more than he's done so far.

In my opinion he's outperformed Helm and possibly one or two others and he would already be a regular if it weren't for the fact that he's waiver exempt. I suspect that his performance thus far this season will enable Sakic to entertain moving Jost at the deadline, because as far as the metrics (and my admittedly imperfect eye-test) suggest he's absolutely ready to take that 4C job. The data is a small sample size though (i.e. 18 games), so that does add some risk admittedly.
Xqb15a liked this.
Feb. 23, 2022 at 9:38 a.m.
#10
NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 1,116
Quoting: Xqb15a
Is Clutterbuck really such an upgrade over NAK that it warrants moving Jost?


I don't know much about NAK, but Clutterbuck has been a regular PKer over the last several years. He's a good guy to have on a playoff run where you don't expect him to score, but you want him to do everything else right (which he does).

I would do this for NYI. Jost is a nice add to this team and I don't mind retaining on an expiring contract. It basically becomes a 3rd for Jost while losing out on the assets you'd receive for just trading Clutterbuck by himself. I think that's fair. Jost playing both center and wing is helpful too, we could use more guys like that.
Xqb15a and Richard88 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll