SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

panarin trade / comment

Created by: mhockey91
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 21, 2017
Published: Apr. 21, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$2,750,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Pacioretty, Max
MTL
  1. Panarin, Artemi
Additional Details:
pretty fair trade. hawks get 1.5 mill in cap relief too
2.
CHI
VGK
  1. Krüger, Marcus
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$76,000,000$67,287,295$3,558,000$757,500$8,712,705
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Pacioretty, Max
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 2
Toews, Jonathan
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Pánik, Richard
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Sharp, Patrick
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Anisimov, Artem
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Kane, Patrick
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Schmaltz, Nick
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
Hossa, Marián
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Hartman, Ryan
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
Hinostroza, Vinnie
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Motte, Tyler
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Rasmussen, Dennis
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 1
Hayden, John
$925,000$925,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Kero, Tanner
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Keith, Duncan
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Crawford, Corey
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Hjalmarsson, Niklas
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Seabrook, Brent
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Glass, Jeff
$612,500$612,500
G
UFA - 1
Forsling, Gustav
$872,500$872,500
LD
UFA - 2
van Riemsdyk, Trevor
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
Pokka, Ville
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA - 1
Svedberg, Viktor
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 21, 2017 at 9:30 p.m.
#1
StammerTime
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 26
Why does every Chicago fan hate Panarin? Is two season of over 0.9 P/G not good enough? I get wanting to lose seabrook.. but cmon, Panarin has the birghtest future of anyone on the hawks
Sharp_10 liked this.
Apr. 21, 2017 at 9:35 p.m.
#2
Sharp_10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 184
Likes: 23
Quoting: StammerTime
Why does every Chicago fan hate Panarin? Is two season of over 0.9 P/G not good enough? I get wanting to lose seabrook.. but cmon, Panarin has the birghtest future of anyone on the hawks


thank you......granted this is the best Panarin trade I've seen on here. The guy is a stud, it's not easy to find/acquire guys with that talent
Apr. 21, 2017 at 9:46 p.m.
#3
mhockey91
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Sharp_10
Quoting: StammerTime
Why does every Chicago fan hate Panarin? Is two season of over 0.9 P/G not good enough? I get wanting to lose seabrook.. but cmon, Panarin has the birghtest future of anyone on the hawks


thank you......granted this is the best Panarin trade I've seen on here. The guy is a stud, it's not easy to find/acquire guys with that talent


I think panarin is a great player, but So is pacioretty, and he comes at 1.5 million cheaper. if habs have a first round exit they could be looking to make a major shakeup to their core for the 2nd season in a row and they love their Russians. I think its a pretty balanced trade
Apr. 21, 2017 at 9:52 p.m.
#4
Nick628
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2016
Posts: 338
Likes: 32
Panarin isn't a playoff type player. He disappeared again this year. He had his chances. Couldn't bury them. End of period 1 clear cut break missed the net. Can't have it. He needs to bury his chances.
Apr. 21, 2017 at 10:00 p.m.
#5
exo2769
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,806
Likes: 10,002
Edited Apr. 21, 2017 at 10:06 p.m.
1.) No one hates Panarin. He simply doesn't have a NMC/NTC.
2.) His playoffs last year was brief, but a point per game exactly. He played well. So "again" is just a lie.
3.) About the trade...pretty decent. I'm admittedly bias but it is the 2nd year (out of 2) that Panarin out played Pac. The 1.5M helps, but they'd had to give us our pick back.

Nick, I get you confused with the other Nick, is this all based off 1 shot attempt? He played the boards well and NO ONE on that top 6 played well.
Apr. 21, 2017 at 10:44 p.m.
#6
mhockey91
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: exo2769
1.) No one hates Panarin. He simply doesn't have a NMC/NTC.
2.) His playoffs last year was brief, but a point per game exactly. He played well. So "again" is just a lie.
3.) About the trade...pretty decent. I'm admittedly bias but it is the 2nd year (out of 2) that Panarin out played Pac. The 1.5M helps, but they'd had to give us our pick back.

Nick, I get you confused with the other Nick, is this all based off 1 shot attempt? He played the boards well and NO ONE on that top 6 played well.


Panarin also has the benefit of getting to play with Kane. I think they're both 2 very close players, but if u feel Chicago should get an extra mid round pick due to higher point production, that's fair.
Apr. 21, 2017 at 10:46 p.m.
#7
mhockey91
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Nick628
Panarin isn't a playoff type player. He disappeared again this year. He had his chances. Couldn't bury them. End of period 1 clear cut break missed the net. Can't have it. He needs to bury his chances.


Wasn't panarin a PPG last playoffs?
Apr. 21, 2017 at 11:39 p.m.
#8
trickydick55
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 755
Likes: 118
Quoting: StammerTime
Why does every Chicago fan hate Panarin? Is two season of over 0.9 P/G not good enough? I get wanting to lose seabrook.. but cmon, Panarin has the birghtest future of anyone on the hawks


Its more so they need to trade him. thye need to get more cost effective and panarin is the best contract to trade. they'll get a decent return, clear substantial cap room. with players like Kane and Toews on this team, they can piece together rosters with young talent and cheaper free agents. this roster is not equipped to carry panarin @ 6 mill.
Apr. 22, 2017 at 2:45 a.m.
#9
VANHORVAT53
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 5
Quoting: Nick628
Panarin isn't a playoff type player. He disappeared again this year. He had his chances. Couldn't bury them. End of period 1 clear cut break missed the net. Can't have it. He needs to bury his chances.


Most russians are bad in the playoffs
Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:25 a.m.
#10
Hockeyplayer1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 199
Quoting: Nick628
Panarin isn't a playoff type player. He disappeared again this year. He had his chances. Couldn't bury them. End of period 1 clear cut break missed the net. Can't have it. He needs to bury his chances.


Classic emotional response to 4 playoff games from this year. With clearly NO recollection of how Panarin played last year in his first Stanley Cup playoffs.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll