SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fix the RHD long term with two NCAA signings and one trade

Created by: alwaysnextyear
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 1, 2022
Published: Apr. 1, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Hopefully VAN can snag one or two NCAA free agents to bolster the RHD depth after the NCAA playoffs are over. Livingstone and Frisch both have ties to the area/team and the Canucks have a serious need at the position, so they could land them both. There may not be a spot on the big club right away on paper, but if either outplays Schenn or Dermott they could win one. Otherwise Schenn is gone next year and Myers the year after, so a succession plan is there.

If the JT Miller camp holds firm on an 8 year term for big money, VAN should deal him this offseason. This CBJ trade gets them a good young Dman in Boqvist and another high pick this year. If Texier develops into a good middle-sixer then it's a bonus. I signed Boqvist to what would be similar to a Girard-type deal, but they have the option to bridge as well.

If this is an improved roster that makes the playoffs, great! If not, then the team got younger, with more high end prospects, and still has plenty of cap room and one big chip to play before the 2023 trade deadline in Captain Horvat.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,500,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
8$5,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Livingstone, Jake
2$925,000
Frisch, Ethan
2$925,000
Trades
VAN
  1. Boqvist, Adam [RFA Rights]
  2. Texier, Alexandre
  3. 2022 1st round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
*12th overall pick in 2022*
CBJ
  1. Miller, J.T.
Additional Details:
CBJ given permission to negotiate extension with Miller before the trade
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$77,151,667$1,250,000$1,150,000$5,348,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:20 p.m.
#1
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
I feel like moving Boqvist is a huge no-no for Columbus. RD is a hole that absolutely needs to be addressed for them, and trading him does the opposite.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1,566
Quoting: Lenny7
I feel like moving Boqvist is a huge no-no for Columbus. RD is a hole that absolutely needs to be addressed for them, and trading him does the opposite.


That's fair; maybe the deal includes Schenn going back for a short-term solution? This deal was actually pitched by another Jackets fan on here.
Lenny7 liked this.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:26 p.m.
#3
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
That's fair; maybe the deal includes Schenn going back for a short-term solution? This deal was actually pitched by another Jackets fan on here.


Yeah, I don't know...just doesn't seem like an insanely smart move long term...If I'm the Jackets, I'm drafting whichever of Nemec or Jiricek I can get with that Hawks pick (Assuming my beloved Ducks don't leap frog them and steal 'em), and going with Boqvist-Jiricek/Nemec long term.

Not a Jackets fan, but I'd do something like 12OA+Tex+another prospect, but I just don't see the value in digging a hole to fill another. Just my thoughts though.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:30 p.m.
#4
JarmoK
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 366
Lol all that for one year of a 30yo center? Find another sucker
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:31 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1,566
Quoting: JarmoK
Lol all that for one year of a 30yo center? Find another sucker


You didn't read the description. The trade only happens with Miller agreeing to an extension.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:38 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Only way Columbus considers this is if Miller cones with an extension and they are able to get Jiricek or Nemec in the draft. If not they probably want to keep Boqvist.

It could also depend on how Columbus views Cuelamens development and how close he is to NHL ready.
dopplsan liked this.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:43 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 582
I don’t see why CBJ would want Miller tbh. They seem to be more of in a rebuild than we are
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:46 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
alwaysnextyear
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1,566
Quoting: Ajp_18
Only way Columbus considers this is if Miller cones with an extension and they are able to get Jiricek or Nemec in the draft. If not they probably want to keep Boqvist.

It could also depend on how Columbus views Cuelamens development and how close he is to NHL ready.


Quoting: NV94
I don’t see why CBJ would want Miller tbh. They seem to be more of in a rebuild than we are


The deal hinges on Miller negotiating an extension with the Jackets before the trade is official. The idea would be to bring in another high end player (that can play C) to help persuade Laine to extend long term as well.
NV94 and Ajp_18 liked this.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 2:51 p.m.
#9
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 4,353
Quoting: Lenny7
I feel like moving Boqvist is a huge no-no for Columbus. RD is a hole that absolutely needs to be addressed for them, and trading him does the opposite.


Quoting: Ajp_18
Only way Columbus considers this is if Miller cones with an extension and they are able to get Jiricek or Nemec in the draft. If not they probably want to keep Boqvist.

It could also depend on how Columbus views Cuelamens development and how close he is to NHL ready.


Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, I don't know...just doesn't seem like an insanely smart move long term...If I'm the Jackets, I'm drafting whichever of Nemec or Jiricek I can get with that Hawks pick (Assuming my beloved Ducks don't leap frog them and steal 'em), and going with Boqvist-Jiricek/Nemec long term.

Not a Jackets fan, but I'd do something like 12OA+Tex+another prospect, but I just don't see the value in digging a hole to fill another. Just my thoughts though.


Looked at this trade when it was originally put together. @THE_CANNON

All told, I'm for it - if CBJ are comfortable Miller can keep playing at a high level when he is centering, say Bjorky and Laine, it'd be great to have him and Silly as our 1+2 for the next 4-5 years. I even think that because he will be a little bit older when this contract expires, he might not cost *as much.*

Right now, CBJ are hurting for a 1C, as well as RD depth. This trade would at least answer the first, but it leaves us in the same position with the latter. CC has some good upside, but the consensus seems to be he is 1-2 seasons away.

Quoting: alwaysnextyear
That's fair; maybe the deal includes Schenn going back for a short-term solution? This deal was actually pitched by another Jackets fan on here.


I think adding Schenn would be good. CBJ need true RDs, and the guy is big - CBJ have plenty of small(er), mobile, puck-movers on the blue-line, not a ton of big, S-A-H D.

I could see something like this trade happening around the draft, with CBJ also moving Gus for a 1st. They could retain half, and VAN could act as a broker to pick up more salary, and move him to a third party.

I'm not sure who specifically is in the market for a T6 winger, but I think Gus' stock is high enough.

Could leave us with a roster something like:

Bjorky - Miller - Laine
Johnson - Silly - Jake
Chinakhov - Rosy - Jenner
Robinson - Kuraly - Foudy

Z - Bean
Vlad - Peeke
Carlsson - Schenn

Obviously see some move-around based on merit/ injury, but pretty good, imo. I'd see Johnson/ Marchenko likely spending some time in the AHL to season, probably more likely Marchenko of the two. Bemstrom could likely be an off-season move.
WhereArtTLuongo liked this.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 3:09 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
The deal hinges on Miller negotiating an extension with the Jackets before the trade is official. The idea would be to bring in another high end player (that can play C) to help persuade Laine to extend long term as well.


Ngl, I’m not worried about Laine. If he stays great if not, oh well. He’s been good this year but he’s also a one trick player with a great shot, he floats defensively and doesn’t really drive play.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 3:37 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
I have a hard time seeing the motivation for CBJ to go after miller. Theyre going to be in a rebuild when miller can give them value on a contract and by the time theyll be ready to compete miller will probably be overpaid and he will be getting old.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 4:30 p.m.
#12
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
I don’t think Miller would want to sign in CBJ. Value probably isn’t that far off but I see Miller being resigned or traded to a team that thinks they can win a cup. I’m just praying he isn’t in Blue and Red next year.
Apr. 1, 2022 at 10:57 p.m.
#13
JarmoK
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 366
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
You didn't read the description. The trade only happens with Miller agreeing to an extension.


That is the opposite of how to execute a rebuild.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll