SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/GM Game

Board of General Managers Official Thread

Jul. 9, 2017 at 2:31 p.m.
Stickied
Follow CapFriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2015
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 558
BOG Members:
boltscharge17
Zach
DavidBooth7
Turner33
Matt59
JT_Miller
jmac490
Jul. 9, 2017 at 2:47 p.m.
Stickied
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Edited Aug. 9, 2017 at 10:31 a.m.
BOG Agenda

****BOG OPENINGS TO COME - DROP YOUR NAME IN TO BE CONSIDERED FOR POSITION BY THE 12TH

BOG Members Leaving:
matt59 (August 14th)
jmac490

GMs Who Applied For BOG:
Bo53Horvat
Icegirl
phillyjabroni
DarylthePony
Duster


Votes:

1) To place boltscharge17 on Level 1 of Infraction System: 3-0: Booth Turner Zach in favour

2) To place DirtyDangles on Level 2 (again): 2-2

Other:
1) GM Game Awards: to discuss further after FA
Turner33, CleanDangles, phillyjabroni and 4 others liked this.
Jun. 20, 2017 at 9:37 p.m.
#2776
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
Hey guys. I noticed I got an infraction via the BOG with a conversation involving MathewsMarnerNylander. can I get one of you to give me an explanation on my VGK page? not quite sure that was all about.

tanks - philljabroni
Jun. 20, 2017 at 9:48 p.m.
#2777
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 844
Likes: 72
Quoting: matt59
Quoting: matt59

Infraction Levels:

1.) Posted Warning on GM team's thread from a BOG member. After 15 days of good behavior, level 1 infractions are cleared.
2.) 24 roster freeze/ cool down period where the offending GM is not allowed to make trades, trade offers, or free agency bids. The offending GM is essentially isolated from the game for a full day, with the purpose being to reflect upon their actions and change their ways. This doesn't hurt the team for future GMs and keeps the game-wide disruption to a smaller scale instead of draft pick loss. After the cool-down period, the Level one infraction remains for 15 days.
3.) Demotion to an AGM position. Can be promoted back to GM if good behavior over a long period of time (at discretion of BOG) is shown.
4.) Removal from the GM Game

Infractions will result from any of the following below:

1.) Minor sarcastic comments with the intent to hurt other GM's
2.) Minor harassment towards another GM; Example: (this trade gives me AIDs.)
3.) Language towards another GM; Example: (were your feelings hurt snowflake?)
4.) General rudeness towards another GM (under the discretion of the BOGs)

The second part numbers aren't supposed to correspond to each level of infraction. They were intended to list off what would be considered an infraction for each occurrence.


Gotcha. Thanks
matt59 liked this.
Jun. 20, 2017 at 9:49 p.m.
#2778
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
tanks for the explanation BOG!!
Jun. 20, 2017 at 10:56 p.m.
#2779
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Vote to place phillyjabroni on Stage 1 of the Infraction Policy currently 3-0, with Booth, Matt, and Bolts in favour. Still waiting for Zach, Turner, JT Miller and jmac
Jun. 20, 2017 at 11:01 p.m.
#2780
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 7,960
Likes: 1,222
Vote to place phillyjabroni on Stage 1 of the Infraction Policy currently 4-0, with Booth, Matt, Zack, and Bolts in favour. Still waiting for Turner, JT Miller and jmac
Jun. 20, 2017 at 11:05 p.m.
#2781
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Is that good to go since its majority?
Jun. 20, 2017 at 11:09 p.m.
#2782
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 7,960
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: DavidBooth7
Is that good to go since its majority?


I think so
Jun. 20, 2017 at 11:13 p.m.
#2783
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Quoting: Zach
Quoting: DavidBooth7
Is that good to go since its majority?


I think so

Okay, if it's good with you guys I'll post the Infraction notice in the GM Game Infraction Thread. Matt could you please write up the warning if possible? Thanks
Zach liked this.
Jun. 20, 2017 at 11:22 p.m.
#2784
NYR v3 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 189
Seems like you guys have already reached a majority but I'd vote in favor of stage 1, 5-0
Jun. 21, 2017 at 11:39 a.m.
#2785
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,668
Likes: 4,094
Don't forget to look over the buyout/waiver stuff. You might have to fix it up a bit, but it's something we should get started on sooner rather than later.
Jun. 21, 2017 at 12:12 p.m.
#2786
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 4,652
Hi. There was a GM asking me about a sign-and-trade, however i think i should check with you guys just to confirm to see if a sign-and-trade is allowed so that i don't go making trades i am not allowed to make.
Thanks
Jun. 21, 2017 at 11:44 p.m.
#2787
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Quoting: ricochetii
For your consideration

Making progress on UFA system, so we need to start working out some things.
This is the next item that should be on the agenda:

1. Waivers https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gkPBr6m1I-ZxQ27CiL3EJZ_Pw86cfDSD0WCHWVOs1VA/edit?usp=sharing
Waiver order according to 2nd round draft rankings (non-lottery round). Waiver order will be used for waiver claims, UFA tiebreaker, or any other situation where there is competition for a player's services.
- When more than one team has equal right to a player, the team with higher priority may evoke their waiver priority to break the tie. If the team with the highest priority chooses not to evoke their waiver priority, the option is given to the team with the next highest priority.
- If no team evokes waiver priority, the player goes to the team with the highest priority and does not cost them their position in the waiver order.
- When a team evokes waiver priority, they win the claim and are moved to the end of the waiver priority list.
Players submitted to waivers may not be withdrawn or traded until they have cleared waivers.
There will be separate threads for waiver submissions and waiver claims. Posts made in the wrong thread will be invalid.

2. Buyouts
Prior to free agency, teams will have the option of buying out players. You may not have more than 3 buyouts on your roster, so previously existing buyouts will count towards this limit. However, players who were bought out after the current season ended, will not count towards your roster. This is due to how Capfriendly manages rosters and will be adjusted when we calculate the free agency budget for each team.
Buyouts that show as $0 are still active and will count towards your limit of 3.

- Teams will place up to 3 players on waivers for the purpose of a buyout. All teams will have the option of claiming these players, with no compensation to their current team.
- In order to claim a player, you will have to evoke your waiver priority, regardless of whether there is another team competing for that player's services, but only the team which successfully claims the player will end up using their waiver priority.
- Claimed players will be traded to their new team for free and will not need to be bought out. They will retain their current contract terms (AAV and Term).
- Unclaimed players may then be bought out as normal on their rosters and will be added to the free agent pool.
- There will be a separate thread for official buyouts after the waiver period has ended. Only players that were previously passed through waivers will be eligible.
- This will be the only buyout period before free agency.

-----------------------------------

Waiver Submissions Thread

Deadline to place players on waivers for buyout purposes: ???
Waiver Order: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gkPBr6m1I-ZxQ27CiL3EJZ_Pw86cfDSD0WCHWVOs1VA/edit?usp=sharing
To claim a player: (Link to waiver claims thread)

You may submit a maximum of 3 players. These are players you are willing to release for free to another team. Do not submit a player you do not want to lose for nothing.
Once you have placed a player on waivers, all other teams have until (deadline) to place a claim on that player.
Only players that have been submitted to waivers will be eligible to be bought out before free agency.

Example:

Colorado
Matt Greene (RD): $2.5M x 1 year
Antti Niemi (G): $4.5M x 1 year
Andrew MacDonald (LD): $4.25M x 3 years

--------------

Waiver Claims Thread

Deadline to place a claim on a player: ???
Waiver Order: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gkPBr6m1I-ZxQ27CiL3EJZ_Pw86cfDSD0WCHWVOs1VA/edit?usp=sharing
Players on waivers: (Link to waiver submissions thread)

You may submit a claim for a player in this thread. Post your team name and that you are making a claim, the player's current team, name, position, and contract. You can copy/paste this information from the waiver submissions post(s).

Example:

Columbus places a claim on ...
Colorado
Andrew MacDonald (LD): $4.25M x 3 years

At the deadline for claims, teams will be awarded the player(s) they have placed a claim on according to waiver priority order.
Once a team has successfully claimed a player, they will be moved to the end of the order.

Waiver claims and winners will be announced by the BOG once they have been finalized.

Bumping this for reference. As Rico said, better to get started on this sooner than later
Jun. 22, 2017 at 11:39 a.m.
#2788
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,668
Likes: 4,094
Finally an answer on the Cizikas situation.

Quoting: TSN
One place Methot is not going is back to Ottawa. The Senators, of course, didn’t want to lose the yin to Erik Karlsson’s yang, but it’s important to point out that a team can’t reacquire a player lost in the expansion draft until Jan 1, 2018 – according to deputy commissioner Bill Daly.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 4:01 p.m.
#2789
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
Quoting: ricochetii
Finally an answer on the Cizikas situation.

Quoting: TSN
One place Methot is not going is back to Ottawa. The Senators, of course, didn’t want to lose the yin to Erik Karlsson’s yang, but it’s important to point out that a team can’t reacquire a player lost in the expansion draft until Jan 1, 2018 – according to deputy commissioner Bill Daly.


is it that he cannot re-aquire Casey Cizikas directly from VGK or can I trade Cizikas to a third team and have the third team trade Cizikas to NYI?
Jun. 22, 2017 at 4:03 p.m.
#2790
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,668
Likes: 4,094
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Quoting: ricochetii
Finally an answer on the Cizikas situation.



is it that he cannot re-aquire Casey Cizikas directly from VGK or can I trade Cizikas to a third team and have the third team trade Cizikas to NYI?


No. It is that you cannot re-acquire a player you lost through expansion. Has nothing to do with what team he's on, just what team he started with.
NYI can not have Cizikas on their roster until after January 1st by any means.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 4:22 p.m.
#2791
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
Quoting: ricochetii
Quoting: phillyjabroni


is it that he cannot re-aquire Casey Cizikas directly from VGK or can I trade Cizikas to a third team and have the third team trade Cizikas to NYI?


No. It is that you cannot re-acquire a player you lost through expansion. Has nothing to do with what team he's on, just what team he started with.
NYI can not have Cizikas on their roster until after January 1st by any means.


alright. I have since reverted the trade and thank you for clearing this up. smile
Jun. 22, 2017 at 4:30 p.m.
#2792
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,668
Likes: 4,094
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Quoting: ricochetii


No. It is that you cannot re-acquire a player you lost through expansion. Has nothing to do with what team he's on, just what team he started with.
NYI can not have Cizikas on their roster until after January 1st by any means.


alright. I have since reverted the trade and thank you for clearing this up. smile


I was just informing the BOG. They haven't said anything on the matter yet, but I would imagine they will. They'd have to inform NYI as well.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 4:33 p.m.
#2793
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
That could get tricky. He gave me a 2017 4th (NYR) for him...
Jun. 22, 2017 at 5:53 p.m.
#2794
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,668
Likes: 4,094
Quoting: phillyjabroni
That could get tricky. He gave me a 2017 4th (NYR) for him...


I believe at the time you guys were given the option of leaving the trade or reverting it. If you had to revert it after the pick was used, he would have to be given a 2018 pick back.
That was a risk he was willing to take.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 5:57 p.m.
#2795
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 4,652
guys, the pick in the trade was 2018.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 7:51 p.m.
#2796
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
guys, the pick in the trade was 2018.

Incorrect. On page 19, post 452 of the trade thread, the trade gives NYI the 2017 4th (NYR) for Cizikas
Jun. 22, 2017 at 7:58 p.m.
#2797
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
As the Cizikas trade should be reverted for the reason Rico outlined above, we just need to deal with NYIs compensation for the 2017 4th he gave to Vegas. We could either give the player Vegas selected with that pick (Brady Lyle or something?) or give NYI a 2018 4th from Vegas determined by waiver order
Jun. 22, 2017 at 8:25 p.m.
#2798
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 4,652
Quoting: DavidBooth7
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
guys, the pick in the trade was 2018.

Incorrect. On page 19, post 452 of the trade thread, the trade gives NYI the 2017 4th (NYR) for Cizikas


but when we agreed on the trade we agreed on 2018.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 8:31 p.m.
#2799
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,053
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
Quoting: DavidBooth7

Incorrect. On page 19, post 452 of the trade thread, the trade gives NYI the 2017 4th (NYR) for Cizikas


but when we agreed on the trade we agreed on 2018.

The trade posted in the trade thread indicates the NYR 2017 4th. With this pick, Vegas selected a player. In addition, it says on your page that you dealt that very pick to Vegas.
Jun. 22, 2017 at 8:31 p.m.
#2800
Black Lives Matter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 29,924
Likes: 4,652
never mind, i wasn't thinking. i guess it was a 2017 4th, lol.
nobody liked this.
 
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll