SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/GM Game

Board of General Managers Official Thread

Jul. 9, 2017 at 2:31 p.m.
Stickied
Jarvis
Follow CapFriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2015
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 558
BOG Members:
boltscharge17
Zach
DavidBooth7
Turner33
Matt59
JT_Miller
jmac490
Jul. 9, 2017 at 2:47 p.m.
Stickied
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
Edited Aug. 9, 2017 at 10:31 a.m.
BOG Agenda

****BOG OPENINGS TO COME - DROP YOUR NAME IN TO BE CONSIDERED FOR POSITION BY THE 12TH

BOG Members Leaving:
matt59 (August 14th)
jmac490

GMs Who Applied For BOG:
Bo53Horvat
Icegirl
phillyjabroni
DarylthePony
Duster


Votes:

1) To place boltscharge17 on Level 1 of Infraction System: 3-0: Booth Turner Zach in favour

2) To place DirtyDangles on Level 2 (again): 2-2

Other:
1) GM Game Awards: to discuss further after FA
Turner33, CleanDangles, phillyjabroni and 4 others liked this.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 5:08 p.m.
#3601
krakowitz
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 9,293
Likes: 3,387
Quoting: JT_Miller
Quoting: DavidBooth7

Sure why not

1-0 of implementing krakowtiz's idea above, date TBD

I like the idea but I think we should draft a more formal list of things to vote on/create more categories before we vote on anything. But definitely include Krakowitzs ideas in there as well.


If you guys want a more thorough draft of it, I have some time tonight to make one, I can get it to you guys either tonight or tomorrow. But I also understand if the BOG wants to make it themselves
Jul. 13, 2017 at 5:14 p.m.
#3602
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
I say we do a general, best GM award, everyone is on the nomination ballot for that one. Then krakowtizs ideas: Best All-In team, Brightest Future team, and Biggest Real-Life Improvement, team. You would choose one of these categories that you feel you fall into, and then we'd vote. And I'd like it GMs to post who they are voting for, as opposed to having a poll. That why you don't know who voted for who, ppl could vote for themselves, etc. Just using this format

GM DavisBooth7, Pittsburgh Penguins

Selection For GM Of The Game: John Doe, Seattle Seahawks

Thoughts?
Jul. 13, 2017 at 6:28 p.m.
#3603
LicMysak
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 7,711
Likes: 2,820
Quoting: DavidBooth7
I say we do a general, best GM award, everyone is on the nomination ballot for that one. Then krakowtizs ideas: Best All-In team, Brightest Future team, and Biggest Real-Life Improvement, team. You would choose one of these categories that you feel you fall into, and then we'd vote. And I'd like it GMs to post who they are voting for, as opposed to having a poll. That why you don't know who voted for who, ppl could vote for themselves, etc. Just using this format

GM DavisBooth7, Pittsburgh Penguins

Selection For GM Of The Game: John Doe, Seattle Seahawks

Thoughts?


We should also have most sustainable team. Team that are contenders now and have a great farm system which will help them for many years to come.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 10:53 p.m.
#3604
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
BOG, we have received an infraction report. Please scroll down and take a look at it. MatthewsMarnerNylander has not received any infractions to date. This infraction would place him on Level 1 of the Infraction system.

I will abstain from voting for now as I want to see what the rest of you think about this before voting. Please make sure to read this and vote fellow BOG's
Jul. 13, 2017 at 10:56 p.m.
#3605
jmac490
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,744
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: DavidBooth7
BOG, we have received an infraction report. Please scroll down and take a look at it. MatthewsMarnerNylander has not received any infractions to date. This infraction would place him on Level 1 of the Infraction system.

I will abstain from voting for now as I want to see what the rest of you think about this before voting. Please make sure to read this and vote fellow BOG's


1-0
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:00 p.m.
#3606
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
Quoting: jmac490
Quoting: DavidBooth7
BOG, we have received an infraction report. Please scroll down and take a look at it. MatthewsMarnerNylander has not received any infractions to date. This infraction would place him on Level 1 of the Infraction system.

I will abstain from voting for now as I want to see what the rest of you think about this before voting. Please make sure to read this and vote fellow BOG's


1-0

Yeah I've decided I'll vote in favour. 2-0, Jmac and Booth in favour
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:03 p.m.
#3607
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
After this comment, I move that he be placed on Stage 2:
Quoting: MatthewsMarnerNylander
Quoting: TonyStrecher


Kreider is a 26 year old power forward who could easily score 30 goals next year. This year he scored more goals than John Tavares, Tyler Seguin, Jamie Benn, Blake Wheeler and Jack Eichel to name a few. That is a very valuable player.


You know who else could easily score 30 goals next year? John Tavares, Tyler Seguin, Jamie Benn, Blake Wheeler and Jack Eichel. Kreider sure as hell won't justify me moving Pettersson alone, plus Hyman and Roslovic. Don't waste my time with BS offers

1-0 in favour of Level 2
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:09 p.m.
#3608
DirtyDangles
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Not sure why the Simmonds deal would be illegal...Voracek was traded multiple times before being reaquired and was not an expansion pick or had anything to do with an expansion trade.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:11 p.m.
#3609
phillyjabroni
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Not sure why the Simmonds deal would be illegal...Voracek was traded multiple times before being reaquired and was not an expansion pick or had anything to do with an expansion trade.


Its the same reason the Matt Read trade got reverted...you cannot acquire a player that was previously on your team that is being retained. Meaning, you cannot get a player back into your possession with retain salary coming back to you. It's part of the cap circumvention rules
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:12 p.m.
#3610
Turner33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 6,439
Likes: 1,521
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Not sure why the Simmonds deal would be illegal...Voracek was traded multiple times before being reaquired and was not an expansion pick or had anything to do with an expansion trade.


It doesn't matter from what I've been told. In no way can you get them back w retained salary. I thought the same thing. I thought as long as the team u traded them to didn't trade then back to you it was ok, but I was wrong.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:13 p.m.
#3611
DirtyDangles
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Turner33
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Not sure why the Simmonds deal would be illegal...Voracek was traded multiple times before being reaquired and was not an expansion pick or had anything to do with an expansion trade.


It doesn't matter from what I've been told. In no way can you get them back w retained salary. I thought the same thing. I thought as long as the team u traded them to didn't trade then back to you it was ok, but I was wrong.


The way I read the CBa is that if you retain on a player you can not reaquite that player for a year. The Flyers did not retain salary ever on Voracek. So the way I see it is that it is a legal deal.
Duster liked this.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:16 p.m.
#3612
Turner33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 6,439
Likes: 1,521
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Quoting: Turner33


It doesn't matter from what I've been told. In no way can you get them back w retained salary. I thought the same thing. I thought as long as the team u traded them to didn't trade then back to you it was ok, but I was wrong.


The way I read the CBa is that if you retain on a player you can not reaquite that player for a year. The Flyers did not retain salary ever on Voracek. So the way I see it is that it is a legal deal.


Just put it on hold. I'm pretty sure it's not, but Rico seems to be the best one to ask
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:18 p.m.
#3613
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
Quoting: DavidBooth7
After this comment, I move that he be placed on Stage 2:
Quoting: MatthewsMarnerNylander


You know who else could easily score 30 goals next year? John Tavares, Tyler Seguin, Jamie Benn, Blake Wheeler and Jack Eichel. Kreider sure as hell won't justify me moving Pettersson alone, plus Hyman and Roslovic. Don't waste my time with BS offers

1-0 in favour of Level 2

BOG, please vote
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:23 p.m.
#3614
DirtyDangles
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
You know, making rules up as we go is probably not the best way to do things. But hey, I will leave it up to you guys.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:24 p.m.
#3615
Zach
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,222
Quoting: DavidBooth7
Quoting: DavidBooth7
After this comment, I move that he be placed on Stage 2:

1-0 in favour of Level 2

BOG, please vote


2-0
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:28 p.m.
#3616
Turner33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 6,439
Likes: 1,521
Quoting: DirtyDangles
You know, making rules up as we go is probably not the best way to do things. But hey, I will leave it up to you guys.


This is an NHL rule we've followed from the beginning, sorry man
phillyjabroni and nobody liked this.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:29 p.m.
#3617
matt59
Thread Starter
Go Jackets
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 8,049
Likes: 1,712
I will be holding my vote on all the measures until tomorrow morning... I have not read exactly what has happened so I'm not just going to blindly vote on whats going on. Good night gentlemen.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:29 p.m.
#3618
Turner33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 6,439
Likes: 1,521
Quoting: Zach
Quoting: DavidBooth7

BOG, please vote


2-0


3-0 for stage 1
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:29 p.m.
#3619
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
Quoting: Turner33
Quoting: Zach


2-0


3-0 for stage 1

What about Stage 2?
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:30 p.m.
#3620
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
And it's now 4-0 for Stage 1. TBD Stage 2 or not
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:31 p.m.
#3621
jmac490
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,744
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: DavidBooth7
And it's now 4-0 for Stage 1. TBD Stage 2 or not


Stage 1 seems fair
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:33 p.m.
#3622
DirtyDangles
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
I would also like to point out that a BOG member has retained salty on 4 players.
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:34 p.m.
#3623
jmac490
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,744
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I would also like to point out that a BOG member has retained salty on 4 players.


guessing 1 was irl... who is it?
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:34 p.m.
#3624
nobody
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,552
Likes: 3,052
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I would also like to point out that a BOG member has retained salty on 4 players.

Which member would that be? Keep in mind it may be due to a IRL buyout that the CF AGM team automatically has
Jul. 13, 2017 at 11:36 p.m.
#3625
DirtyDangles
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Ah got ya. That's what it is.
nobody liked this.
 
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll