Wtf is that sharks trade? Not even close. 50 + point defenseman, their starter next year and a 1st for a cap dump, 4th liner and depth defenseman? Just stop making Burns trades please

Brent Burns isn't waiving for a team that's heading for a full fledged rebuild here.
DeBrincat offer looks fine.
If Chicago doesn't qualify Dyan Strome then he's not returning a player like Filip Zadina. No qualifying offer no leverage.

are the sharks and AHL club to you that you can dump worthless junk to and pick their best players for?
your offering a 30 year old AHLer a 4th liner and a mid level prospect for the sharks Starting net-minder next year the 11th overall and the 12 ranked offensive point producer from the Blue line.
this is one of the worst trades I've ever seen on here.

how about Kane 50% retained plus your first for Nieto, Dahlen, and Hill, plus a 4th.

When there's smoke there's fire.. mit of talk about trying to shed his salary. SJ folks obviously over overvaluing his worth based on what he's done. That's how management thought and that's why you have an over paid one dimensional player. SJ need to stem a deal to move him

Too much for the Devils to be giving up
Rather keep Holtz and the pick

Remove the 1st and Kahkonen and the Sharks still probably decline

moving cap is one thing, being stupid and getting fleeced is another. not logical and doesn’t make the sharks better. plus burns blocks the deal undoubtably

Yes, this ^

If Devils are after anyone on Blackhawks, it’s more likely to be Kubalik than DeBrincat (or even Strome).

Lmao why would we trade Regula especially for an ancient Brent Burns? If we are considering moving Cat because he won’t be young enough when we are ready to compete we won’t be giving up assets for older dmen lmao

Then devils fans are dumber than i thought..

You are quoting just one of them.
(Mom says I’m special)

Jajaja

Jajaja